db41, db42 and db43 are they all needed

2007-10-18 Thread Tankko
After installing 6.2 and all the ports I use on a new machine, I have:

apr-db42-1.2.8_2
db41-4.1.25_4
db42-4.2.52_5

and there is db43 out there as well, probably just waiting to be installed.

db41-4.1.25_4 is used by:
portupgrade-2.3.1,2
ruby18-bdb-0.6.2

db42-4.2.52_5 is used by:
apr-db42-1.2.8_2

Which is required by subverson (I need BDB access in subversion).

Do I need all these different version of db?   I guess there is no
huge downside to having them all installed, but it doesn't seem clean
to my anal-retentive nature.

Is there a make.conf flag that will just make them all use db42 (or
db43)?  Is that wise?

Tankko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: db41, db42 and db43 are they all needed

2007-10-18 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Tankko [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
 After installing 6.2 and all the ports I use on a new machine, I have:

 apr-db42-1.2.8_2
 db41-4.1.25_4
 db42-4.2.52_5

 and there is db43 out there as well, probably just waiting to be installed.

 db41-4.1.25_4 is used by:
 portupgrade-2.3.1,2
 ruby18-bdb-0.6.2

 db42-4.2.52_5 is used by:
 apr-db42-1.2.8_2

 Which is required by subverson (I need BDB access in subversion).

 Do I need all these different version of db?   I guess there is no
 huge downside to having them all installed, but it doesn't seem clean
 to my anal-retentive nature.

 Is there a make.conf flag that will just make them all use db42 (or
 db43)?  Is that wise?

Hi,

I have put WITH_BDB_VER=45 to /etc/make.conf.

% pkg_info -R db45-4.5.20.0 
Information for db45-4.5.20.0:

Required by:
apr-gdbm-db45-1.2.8_2
mutt-devel-1.5.16_3
portupgrade-devel-2.3.1
ruby18-bdb45-0.6.2
subversion-1.4.4_1

- Herbert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]