Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
 as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
 invokes installation of FF 2.x.

 This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
 installation of these graphics programs fails.

 Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it?

You can build most of the ports that depend on GECKO with the following
in your `/etc/make.conf' file:

WITH_GECKO= libxul

I just finished rebuilding my packages in a chroot with this option, and
firefox 2.x was not required for a full x11/gnome2 build:

# pkg_info | fgrep firefo
firefox-3.5.3,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla
#

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-14 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:55, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
 as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
 invokes installation of FF 2.x.

 This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
 installation of these graphics programs fails.

 Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it?

 You can build most of the ports that depend on GECKO with the following
 in your `/etc/make.conf' file:

    WITH_GECKO=         libxul

 I just finished rebuilding my packages in a chroot with this option, and
 firefox 2.x was not required for a full x11/gnome2 build:

 # pkg_info | fgrep firefo
 firefox-3.5.3,1     Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla
 #


Even better.

Many thanks.

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Kurt Buff
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
invokes installation of FF 2.x.

This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
installation of these graphics programs fails.

Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it?

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
 as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
 invokes installation of FF 2.x.
 
 This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
 installation of these graphics programs fails.
 
 Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it?

An explaination has recently been discussed on this list. See
the archives, and I'm sure you'll find it very fast. (Sadly,
I can't remember the thread name, but it involved Firefox,
as far as I remember.)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Kurt Buff
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 15:15, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
 as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
 invokes installation of FF 2.x.

 This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
 installation of these graphics programs fails.

 Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it?

 An explaination has recently been discussed on this list. See
 the archives, and I'm sure you'll find it very fast. (Sadly,
 I can't remember the thread name, but it involved Firefox,
 as far as I remember.)

Thanks - I took a look around and I see a thread from April -
Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner - was that
what you were referring to?

Regardless, I'll try that when I have a few minutes.

On to more difficult problems.

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner

2009-04-24 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 21:01 +0300, l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I uninstalled firefox 2, installed firefox 3 and use it. Later,
 portupgrade of librsvg2 began to build firefox 2 (I aborted it with ^C).
 Then I specified
 
 graphics/librsvg2 = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,
 
 in MAKE_ARGS in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to portupgrade
 mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
 
 www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,
 
 but that gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried
 
 www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=libxul,
 
 then:
 
  ===  libxul-1.9.0.7_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
xulrunner-1.8.0.4_15
 
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
 
 What to do - to allow firefox2 to be installed along with firefox3?
 Will they conflict?

You can set the following in /etc/make.conf:

WITH_GECKO=libxul

Most ports have been taught to use libxul for Gecko.  However, firefox2
and firefox3 do not conflict.

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner

2009-04-23 Thread Lena
Hi,

I uninstalled firefox 2, installed firefox 3 and use it. Later,
portupgrade of librsvg2 began to build firefox 2 (I aborted it with ^C).
Then I specified

graphics/librsvg2 = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,

in MAKE_ARGS in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried

www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,

but that gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried

www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=libxul,

then:

 ===  libxul-1.9.0.7_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
   xulrunner-1.8.0.4_15

   They install files into the same place.
   Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).

What to do - to allow firefox2 to be installed along with firefox3?
Will they conflict?

Is Gecko a really necessary dependence of librsvg2 and mplayer-plugin
if they are invoked only from firefox3?  For what?

7.1-PRERELEASE (Oct 20) i386, linux_base-f8-8_11.

Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner

2009-04-23 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:01:57PM +0300, l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
[...]
 Is Gecko a really necessary dependence of librsvg2 and mplayer-plugin
 if they are invoked only from firefox3?  For what?
 
 7.1-PRERELEASE (Oct 20) i386, linux_base-f8-8_11.

You need to replace your xulrunner references in pkgtools.conf with
libxul. Then, you can:

portupgrade -f -r -o www/libxul xulrunner

-- 
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz
--
  Opportunities are seldom labeled
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner

2009-04-23 Thread Matthew Seaman

l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:

Hi,

I uninstalled firefox 2, installed firefox 3 and use it. Later,
portupgrade of librsvg2 began to build firefox 2 (I aborted it with ^C).
Then I specified

graphics/librsvg2 = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,

in MAKE_ARGS in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried


Do a 'make config' in graphic/librsvg2 and disable the mozilla plugin
option.  It's not needed for firefox3 -- at least firefox is still happily
rendering SVG content for me -- and it gets rid of the libxul vs. xulrunner
thing.  Everything else that uses Gecko which I have installed works happily
with WITH_GECKO=libxul in /etc/make.conf

Cheers,

Matthew

PS. Cross posting between different FreeBSD lists is frowned upon.
Even so, you missed out the freebsd-ge...@freebsd.org list...

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-19 Thread Simon Phoenix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Andriy Babiy said the following on 03.11.2006 10:05:
 Hello everybody,
 
 After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, 
 but 
 the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled 
 during configuration.

Yes, I have this problem too with additional optimization.

 Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved 
 configuration - I cannot change this option.
 Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this saved 
 configuration? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to 
 portupgrade to ignore it?

For remove configuration:
cd /usr/ports/www/firefox  make rmconfig
or simply remove
/var/db/ports/firefox2 directory

More details: man 7 ports

- --
Best regards,
Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.)
- ---
KeyID: 0x2569D30B
Fingerprint: 78FC 5C40 07CC D331 148E CC79 84B8 D514 2569 D30B
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFYLO9hLjVFCVp0wsRCra/AKDSCxO7AbXMyq7EbWbGvHdMlJ1ObgCfTk2S
UazaLpz6cfQdYt6tFtAMYwk=
=Cdjq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox2

2006-11-05 Thread Michael Johnson

On 11/5/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi all,

I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2 core
dump issue.
The version of nspr was the lastest.
When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re-compiled the kernel,
and portupgrade -f firefox, I got Firefox running with no problem.
If someone else has a similar issue, keep it in mind. For some
reason, -mtune= and -march= flags caused the problem.



What -march= flags did you use?


Andriy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox2

2006-11-05 Thread Andriy Babiy
On Sunday 05 November 2006 16:44, you wrote:
 On 11/5/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2
  core dump issue.
  The version of nspr was the lastest.
  When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re-compiled the
  kernel, and portupgrade -f firefox, I got Firefox running with no
  problem. If someone else has a similar issue, keep it in mind. For some
  reason, -mtune= and -march= flags caused the problem.

 What -march= flags did you use?

CPUTYPE=i686
-O2 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -mtune=i686

I had the kernel compiled with those flags and used it for a while with no 
problem. Actually, I am not sure: maybe, I could leave the kernel compiled 
with the flags and just re-compile firefox2 without them, or vice versa. I 
got tired of re-building the port, so I just disabled the flags everywhere, 
and it resulted in firefox2 running properly.
When the flags were enabled, I got an error while portupgrading firefox, but 
the build didn't fail because if this error. I can't remember exactly; it was 
something like Chrome build failed, core dumped...; firefox was built 
though, but didn't work.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


firefox2

2006-11-04 Thread Andriy Babiy
Hi all,

I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2 core 
dump issue.
The version of nspr was the lastest.
When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re-compiled the kernel, 
and portupgrade -f firefox, I got Firefox running with no problem.
If someone else has a similar issue, keep it in mind. For some 
reason, -mtune= and -march= flags caused the problem.

Andriy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-03 Thread Andriy Babiy
Hello everybody,

After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, but 
the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled 
during configuration.
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved 
configuration - I cannot change this option.
Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this saved 
configuration? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to 
portupgrade to ignore it?

Many thanks in advance.
Andriy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-03 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:05, Andriy Babiy wrote:
 Hello everybody,

 After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure,
 but the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I
 enabled during configuration.
 Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
 configuration - I cannot change this option.
 Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this
 saved configuration? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to
 portupgrade to ignore it?

 Many thanks in advance.
 Andriy

cd www/firefox
make config

Cheers,

Beech
-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \  - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---













pgpCO2wQkbFgg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-03 Thread Michael Johnson

On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello everybody,

After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, but
the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled
during configuration.
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
configuration - I cannot change this option.
Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this saved
configuration? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to
portupgrade to ignore it?



If you have nspr 4.6.3 or lower installed; upgrade to 4.6.3_1
and try running Firefox.


Many thanks in advance.
Andriy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-03 Thread Tsampros Leonidas
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:32:26AM +, Michael Johnson wrote:
 On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello everybody,
 
 After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, 
 but
 the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled
 during configuration.
 Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
 configuration - I cannot change this option.
 Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this 
 saved
 configuration? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to
 portupgrade to ignore it?
 
 
 If you have nspr 4.6.3 or lower installed; upgrade to 4.6.3_1
 and try running Firefox.

Exactly this one was my problem too. After upgrading firefox with
portupgrade -r , i just portupgrade -R on firefox and everything after
that was fine.

At the beginning i thought this was a problem related to the gconfd
problem discussed ona previous thread.

 Many thanks in advance.
 Andriy
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: firefox2 - core dump

2006-11-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
configuration - I cannot change this option.
Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this saved
configuration? Should it be deleted?


/var/db/ports/firefox/

completely safe to delete

--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]