Re: fsck says "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY"
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:05:06PM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: > Hello everyone, > > After a server lost power unexpectedly (read: someone pulled the plug > out), on reboot > the automatic fsck failed with "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY" as > the message. Running fsck interactively doesn't seem to be able to > fix it.. > > Every time in phase one it says: > > CANNOT READ: BLK 66322496 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > Any ideas on what I could try to fix this? > You could have a look at tunefs(8) and turn soft updates off for fsck'ing. HTH Leon -- gnupg key ID: 9B820836 & Fingerprint: 6081 8F41 8FEC 0D69 DB98 F014 0FD4 B47D 9B82 0836 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fsck says "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY"
At 03:49 PM 8/11/2005, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 66322510, Sounds like a HW issue to me. Anyway to confirm this? It is not a very old drive and the filesystem is still readable, I suppose it could have developed some bad sectors.. If you have another machine you can boot from, or another disk, you can install the smartmontools port (/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools) and use that to see what the status of the drive is. -Glenn Is there a way to flag them as bad without formating the drive? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fsck says "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY"
THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 66322510, Sounds like a HW issue to me. Anyway to confirm this? It is not a very old drive and the filesystem is still readable, I suppose it could have developed some bad sectors.. Is there a way to flag them as bad without formating the drive? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fsck says "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY"
On Aug 10, 2005, at 11:05 PM, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 66322510, Sounds like a HW issue to me. --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
fsck says "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY"
Hello everyone, After a server lost power unexpectedly (read: someone pulled the plug out), on reboot the automatic fsck failed with "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY" as the message. Running fsck interactively doesn't seem to be able to fix it.. Every time in phase one it says: CANNOT READ: BLK 66322496 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CONTINUE? [yn] THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 66322510, and the file system is marked as dirty still.. It isn't the root partition or anything, so I can boot the system and mount it read only but I can't repair the damage.. Any ideas on what I could try to fix this? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
