Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Mike Smith wrote: I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans. In response, I have checked as well. All three of my case fans and my huge-block-o-heatsink CPU fan are operating properly. Just to check, I compiled Apache, Postgres, and a fair number of GTK apps. Flawlessly. It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted into STABLE that was never fully tested to compile on an AMD CPU. Hmmm. I'm not here to point fingers, I just want a BSD UNIX to use. One I can compile, anyway. We now have another user who has posted a similar if not identical problem while compiling 4.1.1 using an AMD processor. This is starting to look like a coding problem. To paraphrase Babbage: "I an not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a conclusion." This sounds to me like "nope, you have malfunctioning hardware". I'm not saying that's impossible, but I think it unlikely given that I can reproduce the problem fairly well, and I've certainly tried to take all the steps necessary to rule that out. Are there any committers running -stable on AMD K6 boxes? If so, has someone been able to buildworld for 4.1.1 successfully? Do I have any alternatives left other than procuring new hardware or living with the fact that I will not be able to run FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE? Jeff Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: More panics (different hardware)
Jordan and list, Right on time tonight - 02:06 while running "periodic daily". The panic was exactly the same as before, so I won't repeat it. The command being run at the time was "tee" again. Just before the panic I had shut down all X and was running a "ps -axww ; top | head -24" snapshot every ten seconds. Here it is: -8 PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 0 ?? DLs0:00.26 (swapper) 1 ?? ILs0:00.27 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:15.34 (pagedaemon) 3 ?? DL 0:03.26 (vmdaemon) 4 ?? DL 0:04.60 (bufdaemon) 5 ?? DL 0:31.55 (syncer) 34 ?? ILs0:00.38 mfs -o noatime -s 16384 /dev/ad0s1b /tmp (mount_mfs) 36 ?? ILs0:00.06 mfs -o noatime -s 2048 /dev/ad0s1b /var/run (mount_mfs) 114 ?? Ss 0:00.64 /sbin/dhclient dc0 141 ?? Ss 0:00.91 syslogd -s -vv -a localhost:* 148 ?? Ss0:06.90 ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid 169 ?? Ss 0:00.17 inetd -wW 171 ?? Is 0:00.58 cron 198 ?? Ss 0:00.57 /usr/sbin/sshd 245 ?? Ss 0:01.87 /usr/local/libexec/postfix/master 252 ?? S 0:00.91 qmgr -l -t fifo -u 254 ?? Ss 0:55.62 moused -p /dev/psm0 -t auto 301 ?? Ss 0:00.37 thttpd -C /usr/local/etc/thttpd.conf 33319 ?? S 0:00.05 pickup -l -t fifo 40862 ?? ZN 0:00.00 (junkbuster) 40863 ?? ZN 0:00.00 (junkbuster) 59967 ?? I 0:00.00 cron 59968 ?? Is 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c periodic daily 59969 ?? I 0:00.02 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 59982 ?? I 0:00.08 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 59983 ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 59985 ?? I 0:00.01 mail -s hal9000.bsdonline.org daily run output root 60234 ?? I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /etc/periodic/daily/450.status-security 60239 ?? I 0:00.01 sh /etc/security 60240 ?? I 0:00.01 sendmail root 60241 ?? I 0:00.01 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop 60250 ?? S 0:00.01 sh /etc/security 60251 ?? S 0:00.01 xargs -0 -n 20 ls -liTd 60252 ?? S 0:00.01 sort +10 60285 ?? S 0:00.02 cleanup -t unix -u 60286 ?? S 0:00.01 trivial-rewrite -n rewrite -t unix -u 60287 ?? S 0:00.02 local -t unix 60288 ?? Ss 0:00.02 comsat 60313 ?? D 0:00.55 find /usr/local -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm -o+x ) ( -perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 317 v0 Ss+0:00.13 -bash (bash) 60294 v0 S 0:00.01 -bash (bash) 60318 v0 S 0:00.00 -bash (bash) 60319 v0 R 0:00.00 ps -axww 60274 v1 Is+0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 319 v2 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 320 v3 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 321 v4 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 322 v5 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 323 v6 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 324 v7 IWs+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 278 con- TWN0:00.00 dnetc -ini /home/dnet/dnetc.ini (dnetc-2.8010.463) 290 con- IWN+ 0:00.00 junkbuster /usr/local/etc/junkbuster/junkbuster.conf last pid: 60321; load averages: 0.07, 0.09, 0.16 up 0+23:54:5502:03:49 47 processes: 1 running, 43 sleeping, 1 stopped, 2 zombie Mem: 28M Active, 31M Inact, 18M Wired, 3752K Cache, 19M Buf, 12M Free Swap: 256M Total, 5096K Used, 251M Free, 1% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 60313 root -6 0 980K 544K biord0:01 4.85% 1.76% find 278 dnet 68 20 740K 0K STOP 968:25 0.00% 0.00% dnetc-2.8010. 254 root 2 0 908K84K select 0:56 0.00% 0.00% moused 148 root 2 -12 1284K 328K select 0:07 0.00% 0.00% ntpd 245 root 2 0 996K 236K select 0:02 0.00% 0.00% master 290 proxy 2 5 1736K 0K accept 0:01 0.00% 0.00% junkbuster 141 root 2 0 944K 320K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% syslogd 252 postfix2 0 1072K 524K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% qmgr 114 root 2 0 536K 120K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% dhclient 171 root 10 0 984K 240K nanslp 0:01 0.00% 0.00% cron 198 root 2 0 2144K88K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sshd 34 root 10 0 8712K40K mfsidl 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mount_mfs 301 www2 0 1256K 544K poll 0:00 0.00% 0.00% thttpd 169 root 2 0 1060K 140K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% inetd 60320 root 30 0 1460K 1044K RUN 0:00 0.00% 0.00% top 317 root 3 0 1052K 616K ttyin0:00 0.00% 0.00% bash 59982 root 10 0 668K 264K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sh 36 root 10 0 1532K68K mfsidl 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mount_mfs -8 As you can see I still had the mfs and fdesc mounts active. Now, after the reboot, I'm all disk. We'll see what happens after 02:00 tomorow. Note that this is
username with -
Hi, Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify the user of virtual domains), like : ac-info But rmuser refuse to delete them : gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? P.s. Obviusly users can be delete manually :-) Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco http://www2.masternet.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Pthreads saga continues..
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Daniel M. Eischen wrote: Roman Shterenzon wrote: Good day, Isn't the main thread should break out of accept when it receives signal from the other thread? Am I missing something? Please don't attach such short programs as anything other than text. I'm using a tricky mailer most of the time (not now), so I don't really have control over it. It works for me under -current (you should try compiling it with -Wall): It probably warns with -Wall :)) The point is it DOESN'T work under -stable. bash-2.02$ pthreadtest2 134530048: Sending 134529024 signal 134530048: Sent 134529024 signal Got a signal accept: Interrupted system call Yes, I wish that it was the same under -stable .. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. I would change that to check, in order, cooling, cpu voltage setting, memory and memory timing, power supply, and finally cabling. If you have one of the rare 2.4V 450MHz K6-2-450 they are extreamly I have this one. It worked fine with Vcore 2.2V for couple of months, then started giving strange signal in buildworld. I was going nuts since the temperature was normal and was almost sure it's RAM that went bad. Decreasing Vcore to 2.1 made it panic soon after boot but increasing to 2.4 made it work ok. It's getting warmer though, so like the people say - be sure about heat sink and heat sink grease. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: username with -
Hi Have u looked at pw it's a nice script able program to add/rm/modify users with. Best regard Sren On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:27:08AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: Hi, Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify the user of virtual domains), like : ac-info But rmuser refuse to delete them : gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? P.s. Obviusly users can be delete manually :-) Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco http://www2.masternet.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Freebsd vs. UPS
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Gilbert wrote: I've got a few of the Powerware... both RackMount and regular. I've found them to be dependable and cost effective. They come with software for Linux that I havn't been able to get running. I've got a Powerware 5105 and have tried to install software from CDROM that come with UPS for Solaris SPARC. This soft isn't work properly. But I've got upgrage soft from www.powerware.com for LanSafe III v.4.15 for Linix, Solaris SPARC and Solaris x86. I've tried to use it on all these systems and I was very wonderfull, this soft was work fine. Now I use this soft on Solaris x86 and Solaris SPARC systems. Best regards, Grigory Klyuchnikov Institute for System Programming Russian Academy of Sciences, 109004, Moscow, Russia, B.Kommunistitcheskay, 25, phone(work): +7-095-9125659 fax: +7-095-9121524 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Question
I am using Fbsd 3.4 stable and I have setup NIS, however when I log in trying whoami gives me a number rather than the proper UID while and on a ls ~UID it gives me that I am an unknown user Does anyone have suggestions as to what may be wrong and I do not get the proper UID ? Thanks Theo To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas David Rivers writes: : This built find, and it seems to be setting the interrupt (i.e. I get : not timeouts.) OK. : But, I also don't seem to get connected... like I mentioned before, : a `ping' to another host on the local net will generate traffic : on the line - but it doesn't `get through' (i.e. all packets lost.) : : This is a 10/100 card on a 10-megabit network - is there, possibly, : some special magic to convincing it to use 10-megabits? : : Also, Sean had mentioned something called `fa_select' - 4.1 doesn't : seem to `know' about that... what is it? fa_select is for the NetGear FA410-FX card only. Is that the card you have? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1
Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out already... I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of time, and built that. 4.1.1-R is built and has been running very stable for a week now. I can also agree with others that a good heatsink/fan combo and either conducting grease or pads are a MUST with this chip. With a good amount of grease on mine, it runs fine even without the fan, but I didn't like the idea of this just to save a little bit more of my ear drums. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Duffy wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything from Celerons to Athlons. I agree. I was just waiting for someone who had a successful buildworld of 4.1.1-STABLE on a K6-II or K6-III to speak up (since these were the two CPUs in question). I assume (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jordan is saying that he has done just that. Given, I'm sure he knows the issues better than I. While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I helped start :) If the 4.1.1-STABLE build fails in the same place however, can I assume that that would be interesting data? Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: Strange GCC Error
On 30-Sep-00 Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
I've been working on a PGP 6.5.8 port, however I get the following:
gcc -O -pipe -DPGP_UNIX=1 -DPGP_COMPILER_GCC=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DPGP_DEBUG=1 -DUNFINISHED_CODE_ALLOWED=1 -DUSE_PGP_LEAKS=1
-I../../.././unix -I../../.././pub/include -I../../.././priv/include
-I../../.././priv/include/opaque -I../../.././priv/external/unix/bsafe/i
nclude/unknown -I../../.././../pfl/common -I../../.././../pfl/common/pre
fs -I../../.././../pfl/common/file -I../../.././../pfl/common/util
-I../../.././../pfl/common/lthread -I../../.././../pfl/common/sorting
-I../../.././../pfl/unix -I. -c -o pgpRandomPool.o pgpRandomPool.c
pgpRandomPool.c: In function `pgpGlobalRandomPoolEntropyWasAdded':
pgpRandomPool.c:470: Invalid `asm' statement:
pgpRandomPool.c:470: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for
class AREG.
pgpRandomPool.c: In function `sRandAddKeyEntropy':
pgpRandomPool.c:870: Invalid `asm' statement:
pgpRandomPool.c:870: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for
class AREG.
gmake[4]: *** [pgpRandomPool.o] Error 1
It appears that the following statement is the culprit:
#define UMULH_32(r,a,b) __asm__("mull %2" : "=d"(r) : "%a"(a), "mr"(b)
: "ax")
Take out the final ': "ax"'. The %ax (or rather, since it is a mull, %eax)
register is already used due to the constraint on the 'a' parameter.
Anyone seen this before?
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1
Small note, as I wasn't thinking this far back when I wrote this.. I tracked stable since 3.3-RELEASE on a K6-2 333 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and never had such problems. Same good cooling - big fan/heatsink and conducting grease. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Wyman wrote: Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out already... I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of time, and built that. 4.1.1-R is built and has been running very stable for a week now. I can also agree with others that a good heatsink/fan combo and either conducting grease or pads are a MUST with this chip. With a good amount of grease on mine, it runs fine even without the fan, but I didn't like the idea of this just to save a little bit more of my ear drums. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way
All, Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB swap, running a generic kernel. Anyone know how long this is gonna take? Thanks in advance, -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
