Re: Apache/PHP ports
And why not symlink apache_php34 to mod_php??? The ports system doesn't use symlinks. So why don't delete the old one? Anyway you time-response is amazing. =) I'm a species of the "American night owl". I'm italian and here is 10:30 AM, anyway thanks again =) Paolo To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Apache/PHP ports
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:33:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ports system doesn't use symlinks. So why don't delete the old one? The files are gone, the directory structure probably remains because of a README.html file or extra stuff left over. I use cvs and not cvsup so I'm not really familiar with what cvsup does with dead directories. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE
"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote: Chris, Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box that is currently not in production. outside# netstat -m 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 129 mbufs allocated to data 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers 128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 312 Kbytes allocated to network (92% in use) ^^ 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines outside# uptime 4:32AM up 1 day, 14:01, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 I don't know whether to be concerned about the 92% utilization since the number of bytes allocated seems low. The machine has never crashed but then it has never served as a server. Is this kind of mbuf utilization expected? Kent Kuriyama SPAWAR Sys Ctr San Diego D424, CINCPACFLT N671KK [EMAIL PROTECTED], 808-471-4125 Mine looks like the following: A box with heavy traffic : FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE Average traffic exceeds 4GB per day. # netstat -m 867/1120 mbufs in use: 800 mbufs allocated to data 67 mbufs allocated to packet headers 463/656/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 1452 Kbytes allocated to network (71% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines # uptime 9:28AM up 206 days, 19:30, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 And a box with very light traffic : FreeBSD 4.1-2828-STABLE Average traffic less than 20MB per day. $ netstat -m 207/448/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 157 mbufs allocated to data 50 mbufs allocated to packet headers 117/254/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 620 Kbytes allocated to network (46% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines $ uptime 9:21AM up 17 days, 17:09, 4 users, load averages: 2.02, 0.97, 0.50 The worrying thing is that the box with light traffic has had to be rebooted because it stopped talking on the network. This happens expecially quickly if I am using NFS a lot. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Sendmail 8.11/TLS
At 4:05 PM -0700 2000/10/12, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: _FFR_'s are not documented. FFR stands for for-future-release. Understood. Yes, BSD systems can use STARTTLS without sfio. Cool. I was not aware that sendmail was capable of using multiple different stdio libraries and still able to support STARTTLS on top of that. 8.12 will not require sfio, nor a BSD stdio library. Excellent! This is wonderful news! Now, I don't suppose you can give us any hints of a projected shipping date, can you? ;-) -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy == Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]|| Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE
"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote: Chris, Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box that is currently not in production. outside# netstat -m 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 129 mbufs allocated to data 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers 128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 312 Kbytes allocated to network (92% in use) ^^ Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been allocated and are currently in-use. The system allocates more when the pool runs out. The % in use is essentially a useless number that shouldn't even be reported because it just causes confusion about what it means. -DG David Greenman Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, David Greenman wrote: ... :Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has : indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been : allocated and are currently in-use. The system allocates more when the pool : runs out. The % in use is essentially a useless number that shouldn't even : be reported because it just causes confusion about what it means. Sounds like a chance for a FAQ entry? I know I got caught by that originally till I sat down and thought about it for a while, might be nice to have. :) : -DG * Matt Heckaman - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE55tQJdMMtMcA1U5ARAr2VAJsHeHGh7t8K6UYbG5ApYG/h9ElZjQCffYY4 zGYXNcARIHhJx8F20rq5w2M= =5VGI -END PGP SIGNATURE- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: xl driver again? Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Paul writes: The xl driver never holds more than 128 mbuf clusters in the receive ring. Whenever a new packet comes in, it sends one of the mbufs out and replaces it with a new one. IT DOESN'T HOLD ONTO THEM. It will however complain if it can't allocate a replacement mbuf. What it will do is allocate them very fast, and sometimes mbufs do get held inside the kernel for too long a time. It seems to be worse in cases where you have a lot of UDP traffic or a large number of open TCP connections. My only suggestion for now is to add more mbufs by bumping NMBCLUSTERS. Is there a reason why the kernel might hold on to mbufs for "too long a time" (I take that to mean longer than it should)? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
boot problems
I just installed 4.1.1-RELEASE on a dual 100mhz ALR Evolution that has a LinkSys 100 nic, Diamond Stealth 64 4mb vision 964, ISA Vibra16 Soundblaster(non-pnp), DPT PM2022A scsi controller which has 2 2G seagate barracuda, 1 Quantum Fireball (1.2 G), 1 DEC (1 G) and a NEC 3x CDROM drive on it. I was able to get the system installed but on boot it panics with this: panic: resource_list_alloc: resource entry is busy I set boot_verbose=1 and the line preceding the panic is ata-: ata2 exists, using next available unit number. I also get a this: atapci0 Busmastering DMA not supported I was having the same problem when I used the kern/boot floppies created from the 4.1.1 CD. I used the floppies created off of a 4.1 CD and I was able to boot fine. I set the release tag to 4.1.1-RELEASE and the install went great, although both php-3 and php-4 packages failed. When it came to configuring the kernel for the install I deleted all network cards, and the pc-card under misc because of conflicts. Where can I get more info on this step of the install? Where can I get some better diagnostics. In verbose mode everything scrolls off the screen to fast to see what else is going on. I am suspicious of my NEC CD drive being a little flaky but I'm not sure if that would effect bootup. Any ideas? Thanks, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: boot problems
Yes they are disabled. Mike -Original Message- From: Alan Edmonds [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 7:19 AM To: Perik, Mike Subject: Re: boot problems Did you disable the IDE controllers in the BIOS? The ata driver is the IDE controller driver. -- Alan Edmonds Director of International Technology Digital:Convergence [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1-214-292-6040 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Minor problem with new ports setup
I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html files are not part of the cvs ports tree. Anyone else noticed this or know why? Andrew On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Scott Dodson wrote: The new ports config has a problem with all the README.html files. They all point to pkg/DESCR for a description, but the new location is pkg-DESCR. I didn't know the correct place to address this, so I posted it here, where should I have posted this? -scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Minor problem with new ports setup
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Andrew Tulloch wrote: I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html files are not part of the cvs ports tree. Anyone else noticed this or know why? The README.html files are not part of the cvs tree. They are created/installed when: 1) you install the ports collection during installation 2) you type 'make readmes' in /usr/ports 3) you type 'make readme' in a port's subdirectory -- Chris D. Faulhaber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Fatal Tarp in 4.1.1
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:13:43AM -0800, Jason Neumann wrote: Greetings, A few days ago I received a 'Fatal Trap 12' followed by a spontaneous reboot on 4.1.1-stable. My installed src was up to date as of Sept. 29, 2000. A common cause of this is loading modules which are out of date with respect to the kernel you are running, e.g. the linux module which is loaded at boot. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Minor problem with new ports setup
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Andrew Tulloch wrote: I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html files are not part of the cvs ports tree. Anyone else noticed this or know why? The ports tree has changed significantly. Go to /usr/ports and type "make readmes" and they'll all be generated (it will take awhile). -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Bad IDE Drive
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: IMO, WD went to pot years back their choice on concentrating on the low end market doesn't help. Seagate's IDE drives seem to have been among the slowest around. Years back started having better results with Maxtor and then IBM came in with the best performance and price for *both* SCSI and IDE. Many have talked about their good experiences with the former, but can't say I recall much on the latter. I've had two recent IBM drives (both U2W 36G, out of four recently purchased) fail on me recently within weeks of purchase. I would hesitate to recommend them again, which is unfortunate because they used to be completely trustable. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
