Re: /dev/dsp problem
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 01:41:30PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: | | | j mckitrick wrote: | | I am running 4.2 stable, and I am having a problem I wonder if you have | seen. When I rebuild the kernel, the dsp device quits working and reports | 'invalid device' when accessed. It seems I have to run install world to fix | it. But this has only worked once. I try running makedev, but that doesn't | fix it. Any idea what I am doing wrong? | | Did you try doing a ./MAKEDEV snd[01] to upgrade your sound /dev | link's. Yes, that was the command I tried twice. But it didn't work. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: /dev/dsp problem
j mckitrick wrote: On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 01:41:30PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: | | | j mckitrick wrote: | | I am running 4.2 stable, and I am having a problem I wonder if you have | seen. When I rebuild the kernel, the dsp device quits working and reports | 'invalid device' when accessed. It seems I have to run install world to fix | it. But this has only worked once. I try running makedev, but that doesn't | fix it. Any idea what I am doing wrong? | | Did you try doing a ./MAKEDEV snd[01] to upgrade your sound /dev | link's. Yes, that was the command I tried twice. But it didn't work. Ok, I wasn't sure what device you were making. I follow 4-stable and have never had the problem. I have also done a "./MAKEDEV all" everytime new devices were added and mergemaster told me to update all. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Profiled Libs
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Kal Torak wrote: Hiyas, I am wondering if its still necessary to specify the -DNOPROFILE=true flag when building and installing a new world in 4.2 stable? In my experience, yes it is. I read somewhere that was default or something now... But I cant remember where and it doesn't seem right to me? And where dose the extra space get taken up when you do compile with profiled libs? Just in /usr/obj? If I upgraded before using profiled libs would making world again without profiles free up the space? The space is also taken up in /usr/lib, where the profiled libs get installed. Also on a side note, when upgrading with mergemaster what flags should be used with it? mergemaster -cv ? I omit the flags and just look at the diffs, as the author intended. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remove "bogus" before responding. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Roadmap for perl upgrades to STABLE?
Is there a plan to upgrared the perl in the STABLE tree to something a bit newer (5.6) than the somewhat old 5.03 that's there now? If so, whne should I expect to see this? -- Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154 Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: lp0 and lo0
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 05:18:14PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: hi, i've cvsuped 4.2-rel to 4.2-stable, and in between something strange happened: on boot, and my guess it's rc.network, prints: lp0: not found lp0: not found lp0: not found lp0: not found which i don't realy care at this point, but later on the loopback net lo0 is not properly configured - no 127.1! some more info: the system is diskless. i've make worldinstall DESTIR=/home/new i've mergemaster -D/home/new im still trying to figure who/where the route to localhost is set, but if anybody has some ideas, it'l make my day :-) $ grep lo0 /etc/defaults/rc.conf ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. #ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 127.0.0.254 netmask 0x" # Sample alias entry. -- Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: 4.1.1-Stable and natd
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 10:23:22PM -0500, Box1 wrote: FreeBSD-4.1.1-Stable Box-A= gateway Box-B= Apache, ircd, etc... servers I'm not able to redirect *only* http/https incoming-packets on my outside interface to a box on my local network. Below if from my /etc/rc.conf and /etc/natd.conf; - natd_enable="YES" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" natd_interface="de0" - redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:6667-7000 6667-7000 -- this works fine redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:25 25 -- this works fine redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:80 80 -- this will *not* work redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:443 443 -- this will *not* work While these redirects are in place, I have used anonymizer.com to make it seem I'm on the outside of my local network and, surf to my URL using a FQDN and alternatively my ISP assigned 'ip'. I then view my ipfw logs on box-A with; tail -f /var/log/security which shows the following; Dec 23 20:48:55 Box-A /kernel: ipfw: 5100 Count TCP 216.34.244.18:32176 my.external.ip:80 in via de0 - I now do a tcpdump -i de0 (while anonymizer.com tries to surf as described above) results show below; 21:03:36.298039 bellatrix.anonymizer.com.2783 my.external.ip.http: S 276149746:276149746(0) win 32120 mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1419389851 0,nop,wscale 0 (DF) My take from this is, the gateway is seeing the packets. At the same time on box-B, I am doing tail -f /var/log/security and i see nothing hitting the apache servers ports. I have tried using other ports in place of 80 and 443, but, the redirects to my *known* working Apache does not happen. assistance needed. Can you add a count rule and do a TCP dump on your gateway's internal interface to see what, if anything, is happening there? What do your firewall rules look like? -- Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
