Re: pam_open_session : Permission denied.

2001-07-26 Thread Ray Kohler

I got these also from a build made on Saturday. They went 
away again after a build on Tuesday night. Build it again,
is my suggestion.


On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:48:09 -0400
"Bryan Berch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am getting the same messages, but they alternate every other
login:
> 
> Jul 25 21:56:24 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
> Jul 25 21:56:24 login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.
> Jul 25 22:23:27 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
> Jul 25 22:23:27 login: pam_close_session: Permission denied.
> Jul 26 17:02:40 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
> Jul 26 17:02:40 login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.
> 
> This started after cvsup and build on saturday July 21.
> 
> >From: "NetAdmin - FoxChat.Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: FreeBSD-Stable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: pam_open_session : Permission denied.
> >Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:30:40 -0400
> >
> >   I'm kind of new to FreeBSD so try not to flame me to bad ... 
I've
> >been searching for a way to correct the following but to no
avail.  I'm
> >not sure if it was something I installed or if it came about on
my last
> >make build/installworld.  I'm not sure if this happens when I
login as
> >user or if it happens when I run "startx" after logging in as
user.  I'm
> >running FreeBSD 4.3-Stable.
> >
> >login: Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: no modules loaded for
'login'
> >service
> >Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: pam_open_session: Permission
denied.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: pam_open_session : Permission denied.

2001-07-26 Thread Bryan Berch

I am getting the same messages, but they alternate every other login:

Jul 25 21:56:24 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
Jul 25 21:56:24 login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.
Jul 25 22:23:27 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
Jul 25 22:23:27 login: pam_close_session: Permission denied.
Jul 26 17:02:40 login: no modules loaded for 'login' service
Jul 26 17:02:40 login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.

This started after cvsup and build on saturday July 21.

>From: "NetAdmin - FoxChat.Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: FreeBSD-Stable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: pam_open_session : Permission denied.
>Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:30:40 -0400
>
>   I'm kind of new to FreeBSD so try not to flame me to bad ...  I've
>been searching for a way to correct the following but to no avail.  I'm
>not sure if it was something I installed or if it came about on my last
>make build/installworld.  I'm not sure if this happens when I login as
>user or if it happens when I run "startx" after logging in as user.  I'm
>running FreeBSD 4.3-Stable.
>
>login: Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: no modules loaded for 'login'
>service
>Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Mark Barthelemy
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



"Root mount failed" in 3.5-Stable to 4.1-Release upgrade

2001-07-26 Thread Russell D. Murphy Jr.


I'm upgrading an old machine from 3.5-Stable to 4.1-Release (on the
way to 4.3-Stable).  I've been following /usr/src/UPDATING.  

The buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, modules, and mknod steps
went fine (as far as I can tell).  I copied /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV to
/dev and ran MAKEDEV for ad0 and ad0s2a.  The only filesystems in use
were wd0s2a, wd0s2h, wd0s2e wd0s2g, and wd0s2f.  The first slice is a
100MB dos partition.  I changed fstab to reflect ad0 rather than wd0.

When I try to re-boot into single user mode with either the new kernel
or the new GENERIC kernel, I get:

   mounting root from ufs:wd0s2a
   wd0: bad sector table not supported
   wd0s2a: bad sector table not supported
   Root mount failed: 22

I tried asking it to boot from ad0s2a, ad0s2, ad0, wd0s2a, wd0s2, and
wd0 with the same results.

If I boot kernel.old (3.5-Stable), I can boot, but can't mount
anything read-write.  / will fsck OK, but:

   mount /dev/wd0s2a /

generates

   mount: Block device required

I've tried using the fixit floppy to re-make the devices ad0, ad0s2a,
wd0, and wd0s2a, but this didn't seem to help (though I may not have
done it in a completely kosher fashion).

I've checked the list archives, but didn't find anything helpful
(probably looked for the wrong keywords. . .).

Any suggestions?

Thanks-

Russ Murphy


-- 
Russell D. Murphy
Department of Economics
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, Virginia  24061
(540) 231-4537

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



amed.restart acting weird

2001-07-26 Thread Mit Rowe

I just recently updated my src and did a make world (4.3-STABLE) and now,
i'm getting strange "functionality: not found" messages when i do a
named.restart...

root# named.restart
functionality: not found
new pid is 19470

But, when i just invoke named, it doesn't happen:

root# killall -9 named
root# named
root#

Any suggestions?

I even re-synced the source and rebuilt named, ndc, named.restart, and
named.reload by hand, and still the same thing.






 _
 Mit Rowe
 (Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe)
 Senior Consultant, SPRID

 Branch Media Inc.ph: 416.323.0840 ext. 262
 260 Richmond St. East Suite 200  fax: 416.323.0894
 Toronto, Ontario  M5A 1P4icq: 7161728
 Canada

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



pam_open_session : Permission denied.

2001-07-26 Thread NetAdmin - FoxChat.Net

  I'm kind of new to FreeBSD so try not to flame me to bad ...  I've
been searching for a way to correct the following but to no avail.  I'm
not sure if it was something I installed or if it came about on my last
make build/installworld.  I'm not sure if this happens when I login as
user or if it happens when I run "startx" after logging in as user.  I'm
running FreeBSD 4.3-Stable.

login: Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: no modules loaded for 'login'
service
Jul 26 13:20:29 zapper login: pam_open_session: Permission denied.

Respectfully,

Mark Barthelemy

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: drm + mga with XFree-4.1.0

2001-07-26 Thread Leonardo Fernandes Guidi


Try the following address:

http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/

Good luck!

Leonardo F. Guidi


> is this possible?
> i've been trying to build the appropriate
> kernel modules without luck...
> 
> the drm dir builds but neither the mga nor the gamma dirs build.
> 
> 
> ===> mga
> Warning: Object directory not changed from original
> 
>/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mga
> cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro  -I. -I..  -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
> -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Winline -Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I.
> -I.. -I. -I@ -I@/../include  -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c mga_drv.c
> mga_drv.c: In function `mga_setup':
> mga_drv.c:219: too many arguments to function `callout_init'
> mga_drv.c: In function `mga_takedown':
> mga_drv.c:334: warning: enumeration value `_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER' not handled in
> switch
> mga_drv.c: In function `mga_init':
> mga_drv.c:393: `DRM_DEV_UID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> mga_drv.c:393: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> mga_drv.c:393: for each function it appears in.)
> mga_drv.c:394: `DRM_DEV_GID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> mga_drv.c:395: `DRM_DEV_MODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in
> 
>/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mga.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Robin P. Blanchard
> IT Program Specialist
> Georgia Center for Continuing Ed.
> fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Have a good laugh!

2001-07-26 Thread John

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  Wind-up A Friend, Colleague, Relative Or Even An Enemy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 Call Windupline and you'll be in stitches!

 With our new service you're able to wind-up, confuse and  
  bemuse people with a choice of bogus callers that you
 can transfer to your victim on any UK landline or mobile 
  and then listen in to the call and hear their reaction

   Don't worry though, they won't be able to hear
you, nor tell that you made the call - try it
   on a speaker phone and a group can hear

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Just use the easy to follow recipe:
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

(i) choose one ripe victim
 (ii) add Windupline by dialling 0906 736 9265 and select

  1 - Wind-up samples
  2 - Mr Angry
  3 - The Irate Delivery Driver
  4 - An Invite To No 10
  5 - There's A Bomb In Your Street
  6 - You're Wanted At The Police Station
  7 - The Tax Inspector
  8 - You've Got My Daughter Pregnant

 (iii) enter your victims number and wait for the transfer
(iv) when they answer, prepare yourself and

  ...enjoy!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   This has got to be the funniest way to wind-up anyone
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.windupline.co.uk
Windupline BCM 1543 London WC1N 3XX  
  United Kingdom  Tel: +44 (0)8707 469024
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
 Calls to 0906 numbers are charged at £1/min at all times
Maximum call duration 5 mins, average 2 mins 
   Please ensure you have the permission
 of the bill payer before calling
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-  
  You've received this email as you're on our mailing list
 If however, you do not wish to receive any further emails   
simply mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the email   
   address(es) to be removed inserted in the subject line
  Windupline is a trading name of Portmead UK Ltd who are 
registered and operate under UK data protection legislation
 We will honour all remove requests
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
  Portmead UK Ltd 27 Old Gloucester Street
   London WC1N 3AF United Kingdom
   Registered in England & Wales 3798100

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Forwarding directed broadcasts

2001-07-26 Thread Rishi Sinha

Hi. I searched the archives of this and other lists, and haven't come up
with a definitive answer to this question. How does FreeBSD deal with
directed broadcast UDP packets that need to be forwarded? I'm trying to
get a 4.2-RELEASE router to forward UDP subnet-directed broadcasts (one of
the router's interfaces is on the destination subnet). It doesn't seem to
do it.

If this has been changing over versions, could someone tell me what the
present status is? If there is a sysctl or some other configuration
parameter to control this, could you let me know about that too?

Thanks,
Rishi.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: natd performance.

2001-07-26 Thread mikea

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:57:26AM -0700, James Satterfield wrote:
> I've got a laptop running as my wireless gateway / firewall.
> It's got a PII 333MHz processor and 128MB ram
> I've only been able to pump about 4MBit/sec through it before natd is
> consuming nearly 100% of the cpu.
> 
> Are these results what I should be expecting?

Sounds pretty fishy to me. Do you have a really large ruleset or
some other oddity? If not, then it would be nice to have more 
information. 

-- 
Mike Andrews
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tired old sysadmin since 1964

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: serial console woes

2001-07-26 Thread Robin P. Blanchard


> > i've followed the instructions per the handbook for setting
> > up a headless box with serial console. i keep running
> > into the same problem. i see the box boot (via the serial link),
> > and all relevant kernel messages are displayed via the serial link;
> > but i never get a login prompt. it's as if only kernel messages are being
> > redirected to the serial link and i don't really have a console.
> >
> > i tried forcing the serial port to be console via by adding
> > 0x30 to its flags in the kernel config and still the same results.
> >
> > i've also played with all imagineable combinations of -P -D and -h
> > in /boot.config
> 
> Do you have getty running on either ttyd0 or cuaa0?

that was it...
thanks!

all's well now.


-- 

Robin P. Blanchard
IT Program Specialist
Georgia Center for Continuing Ed.
fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



natd performance.

2001-07-26 Thread James Satterfield

I've got a laptop running as my wireless gateway / firewall.
It's got a PII 333MHz processor and 128MB ram
I've only been able to pump about 4MBit/sec through it before natd is
consuming nearly 100% of the cpu.

Are these results what I should be expecting?

James.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



RE: natd performance.

2001-07-26 Thread James Satterfield

Forgot to mention that it's currently running 4.3-RELEASE
Finished up a buildworld for -stable last night, but haven't completed the
upgrade process yet.
I haven't heard anything in the forums about changes to either the wi driver
or natd, so I don't think I'll see any improvements when the upgrade is
complete.

James.


I've got a laptop running as my wireless gateway / firewall.
It's got a PII 333MHz processor and 128MB ram
I've only been able to pump about 4MBit/sec through it before natd is
consuming nearly 100% of the cpu.

Are these results what I should be expecting?

James.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



drm + mga with XFree-4.1.0

2001-07-26 Thread Robin P. Blanchard

is this possible?
i've been trying to build the appropriate
kernel modules without luck...

the drm dir builds but neither the mga nor the gamma dirs build.


===> mga
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mga
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro  -I. -I..  -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I.. -I. -I@ -I@/../include  -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c mga_drv.c
mga_drv.c: In function `mga_setup':
mga_drv.c:219: too many arguments to function `callout_init'
mga_drv.c: In function `mga_takedown':
mga_drv.c:334: warning: enumeration value `_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER' not handled in
switch
mga_drv.c: In function `mga_init':
mga_drv.c:393: `DRM_DEV_UID' undeclared (first use in this function)
mga_drv.c:393: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mga_drv.c:393: for each function it appears in.)
mga_drv.c:394: `DRM_DEV_GID' undeclared (first use in this function)
mga_drv.c:395: `DRM_DEV_MODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
*** Error code 1

Stop in
/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mga.

-- 

Robin P. Blanchard
IT Program Specialist
Georgia Center for Continuing Ed.
fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



RE: natd performance.

2001-07-26 Thread James Satterfield

I'm running an essentially open ruleset.

James.

-Original Message-
From: mikea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:06 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: natd performance.


On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:57:26AM -0700, James Satterfield wrote:
> I've got a laptop running as my wireless gateway / firewall.
> It's got a PII 333MHz processor and 128MB ram
> I've only been able to pump about 4MBit/sec through it before natd is
> consuming nearly 100% of the cpu.
> 
> Are these results what I should be expecting?

Sounds pretty fishy to me. Do you have a really large ruleset or
some other oddity? If not, then it would be nice to have more 
information. 

-- 
Mike Andrews
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tired old sysadmin since 1964

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message