RE: Install boggle (4.4)

2001-10-18 Thread Johansson Jan

Yeah, unless I'm misunderstanding you it's *supposed* to do that, once you've 
written the info you have to just 'q' along and not worry about it. Or do you mean 
that you still get the
errors?

Same errors.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: serial console

2001-10-18 Thread Doug Hardie

At 9:24 +1000 10/18/01, Gregory Bond wrote:
If this is an old machine that was installed with an old version and
has been upgraded, then you will probably be running the original boot blocks.
Try installing the latest boot blocks with disklabel.

I see in the source that boot2 reads the /boot.config file.  Since it 
basically prints a line immediately after reading a command and I am 
not seeing that line, I suspect boot2 is not being used.  Here is 
what I see during the boot.

BIOS stuff  ends with:

Verifying DMI Pool Data ...

F1FreeBSD
F5 Drive 1

Default:  F1

-


It then sits there for a minute or so.  If I type a key then I get

  FreeBSD/i386 BOOT
Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/loader
boot:

entering a -h there causes the serial console to work.

If I don't type a key then I get:

BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01
Console:  internal video/keyboard
etc.

-- 
-- Doug

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



art work

2001-10-18 Thread Chad R. Larson

I asked this a couple of days ago and got no answer, so I'm gonna
give it another try.  Perhaps this isn't the right place to ask
these questions...

I received my 4.4-RELEASE CD set from my subscription.  The
subscription had been vectored through BSDcentral.

I want to clone the first (install) CD for the techs in our company.
Rather than putting the CD on my flatbed scanner to get a label image of
the first CD, is the original artwork available somewhere?  You know,
like a TIFF image that was sent to the CD duplicators?  If so, how do I
get it.  If it's not available, I'd like to know that too so I can
generate some kind of artwork of my own.

-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread Oliver Fromme

Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can the diprefs code have a useful effect on an individual subtree
  of a file system if just that tree was deleted and recreated?

Well, it depends on how much free space there is on the
filesystem, and how fragmented it is.

If the filesystem is 90% used, the dirprefs code doesn't
have much room to use disk blocks for new directories in
an efficient way.  But it's probably better than nothing.
It's very difficult to say in advance, so I'd suggest you
just try it.

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH  Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream (E. A. Poe)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: serial console

2001-10-18 Thread Crist J. Clark

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 06:36:35PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
 Hans de Hartog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Something else you might want to try: put
   -P in /boot.config and disconnect your
   keyboard during the BIOS-blabla
 
 /boot.config is obsolete and doesn't work with loader(8).
 
 I'd suggest you write the following line into /boot/loader.conf:
 kernel_options=-h

Since when? It's still in today's -STABLE source from what I can
tell. It works fine on a -STABLE built this weekend.
-- 
Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread Oliver Fromme

Robert Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  A related question that I was wondering,
Does my /kernel have the new dirpref code?

If you've build kernel and userland from the same date
(which is always recommended), then it is sufficient to
look at the newfs(8) manpage.  If it has the -g and -h
options, then you've got dirprefs in the kernel.  They
were introduced at the same time as the kernel dirprefs
code.

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH  Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream (E. A. Poe)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Recovering from clobbered boot manager?

2001-10-18 Thread Lamont Granquist


So, whats the easist way to recover from a clobbered boot manager in
FreeBSD?  I kind of naively assumed that this would be easy to do from an
installation CDROM (4.3-RELEASE) but I failed to get it to work.  Going
Configure-Fdisk in sysinstall didn't work for me.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Recovering from clobbered boot manager?

2001-10-18 Thread Darryl Okahata

Lamont Granquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So, whats the easist way to recover from a clobbered boot manager in
 FreeBSD?  I kind of naively assumed that this would be easy to do from an
 installation CDROM (4.3-RELEASE) but I failed to get it to work.  Going
 Configure-Fdisk in sysinstall didn't work for me.

 For the basic procedure, see the FAQ.  However, one important piece
missing from the FAQ is that you may have to use the boot0cfg command
to enable LBA booting (this is REQUIRED if your FreeBSD partition is
above the 1024-cylinder/8GB limit, assuming your BIOS supports it, and
virtually all recent BIOSes do).  See the boot0cfg man page for more
info.

 Note that the boot0cfg uses the term, packet, to refer to LBA
booting.  Among other things, you need to use the boot0cfg option,
-o packet.  Read the man page.

-- 
Darryl Okahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or
of the little green men that have been following him all day.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: AFS for FreeBSD?

2001-10-18 Thread Garance A Drosihn

At 11:11 AM -0700 10/18/01, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:

   see www.openafs.org. I read that somebody has successfully ported
   the server. I haven't tried it yet but I hope it's working. AFS
   is THE solution for many problems.

/usr/ports/net/arla is the only *client* that works for FreeBSD. For
an AFS *server* check out openafs. I believe there is a porting
effort to get the openafs client working on FreeBSD, but I don't
know the status of it.

BTW, there is a freebsd-afs mailing list. Please subscribe.

It would actually be better to go to www.openafs.org and subscribe to
the mailing-lists there.  They have a list for OpenAFS-port-freebsd ,
and that gets more traffic than the freebsd-afs mailing list.  The
freebsd-afs mailing list was created before openafs showed up, and
was really intended in getting a transarc client for freebsd.  That
did not get very far before IBM decided to spin-off openAFS.

I'll also say that I am looking forward to openafs clients and servers
for freebsd.  I realize arla should work as a client, but it would be
easier for me to sell FreeBSD with an official openAFS client here
at RPI.  Right now the openAFS for linux client is one of the things
which causes us to use linux for some new servers.  ARLA may very well
be fine code, but politically it is a harder sell.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn=   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer   or  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteor  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Loads on a Web/Shell Server

2001-10-18 Thread Ryan Thompson

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hello, 
 
 I have a shell/web hosting company (4EverMail Hosting Services) and I
 have a little bit of a problem with the loads on my machine. I am
 hosting a few IRC servers, eggdrop bots and a few apache websites
 (mainly my own), and the loads are already at 0.15 and so on. 

Load averages confuse a lot of people. 0.15 is quite low. On the server I
am logged in to:

 8:37PM  up 205 days, 17:52, 6 users, load averages: 2.44, 2.51, 2.45

Yet the system (old hardware, too) is still very responsive in a shell,
requests over the network, etc, the idle process gets 70-80% of the CPU
under normal circumstances, and the disk array LED is only on for perhaps
half of the time.

I seen systems of load  1.0 that are essentially ground to a halt, and
systems of loads in the teens that smoke along just fine.

I can't remember seeing a UNIX machine crap out with a load of 0.15,
though! With a load of 0.15, that means that in the large majority of the
time, there are NO processes in the run queue.. which means things are
happening about as close to real time as you can get in a multitasking
OS. A small percentage of the time, you might have one or two processes in
the run queue, which, in most cases, is really nothing at all.

The load averages are, at best, a comparative indication of the change in
load of one system over time. Unless your system is really unresponsive,
you needn't pay much attention to the load averages. If your system IS
really unresponsive, make a note of the load average, and see what is
eating all of your resources.

Hope this helps,
- Ryan


 I last CVSupped on September 25th and cannot understand what is making
 my system loads go up so high. The only clue that I have is the large
 ammount of CPU time being taken by the eggdrop bots and a proccess
 called:
 
 root  5  0.0  0.0 00  ??  DL2Oct01  31:08.71  (syncer)
 
 Would that be enough to cause the system to have such high loads?
 
 Below is a copy of my uname -a:
 
 FreeBSD equinox.4evermail.com 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Tue 
 Sep 25 14:36:10 EDT 2001   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/EQUINOX  i386
 
 If there are any dmesg bits that you might find useful to look at, 
 please shoot me an e-mail and I will be more than happy to supply 
 them to you. Thanks in advance for all your help. -- Jonathan
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
 

-- 
  Ryan Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Network Administrator, Accounts

  SaskNow Technologies - http://www.sasknow.com
  #106-380 3120 8th St E - Saskatoon, SK - S7H 0W2

Tel: 306-664-3600   Fax: 306-664-1161   Saskatoon
  Toll-Free: 877-727-5669 (877-SASKNOW) North America


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread Chad R. Larson

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:32:22PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
 If it's a UFS, and you're running a new enough kernel, it's getting
 done.  Of course, it can only be smart about stuff written to the
 disk after you built the new kernel.  If your disk is mostly empty,
 you're cool.  If it's pretty full you should back it up, delete
 everything (newfs is the fastest way) and then restore all your
 data.

 Well yes, but I would like to avoid all of this if it is
 already using dirpref.  I currently don't have enough drive
 space to fully backup my 24gig stripe set.

Any directories created after you installed a kernel with the new
filesystem layout code will have the more optimized layout.
Directories created earlier will have the layout they've always had.

Since there's not a switch to turn on/off or test, there's no good
way to tell how close to optimal your current disk is.  You can
force it to be nice by dumping and restoring it.  Otherwise, I'd
say the create date/time stamp compared against a calendar would
give you your best guess.

-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread Chad R. Larson

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:26:00PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
 Can the diprefs code have a useful effect on an individual subtree
 of a file system if just that tree was deleted and recreated?

Sure.  Do a rm -rf /usr/ports/* and then re-sup the damn thing.
You'll be impressed.

-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Need a Home Loan? Let Us Help!

2001-10-18 Thread Peter Matthews
Title: Free Rate Quote










All our thoughts, prayers and love go out to the families and friends of the victims of the World Trade Center tragedy.

Refinance Your
Current Mortgage While Rates Are LOW!!
HOME EQUITY LOANS *** JUMBO LOANS *** HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS *** 
  DEBT CONSOLIDATION LOANS *** REFINANCE LOANS *** ALL ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU *** RATES AS LOW AS 
  3.95%

Mortgage Rates Are So Low!
You Can Save Thousands Of Dollars By Taking
Advantage Now!
WE ARE AN ASSOCIATION OF
MORTGAGE BROKERS AND LENDERS 
WITH THE BEST RATES AND THE LOWEST
COSTS!

Wehave thousands of loan 
programs through hundreds of lenders!
You can choose from"Adjustable Rate
Mortgages 
as low as 3.95%
and"Fixed Rate Mortgages as low as
6.50%
all with the lowest costs in the
Nation!*
YOU CAN BUY DOWN YOUR INTEREST RATE
TO
AS LOW AS YOU CAN
AFFORD!
*All rates are based on 
qualification!
Click here for 
your "FREE RATE 
QUOTE"!

CLICK ON LOANS BELOW FOR YOUR
FREE APPLICATION!
Purchase Loans 
 - Thousands of programs 
for First Mortgages!Refinance Loans - Reduce your 
monthly payments and Get Cash Back! 
Second 
Mortgages 
  - We can help you get from 90% up to 125% of your homes value! (ratios vary 
by state)
Debt Consolidation - 
Combine all your bills into One Low Monthly 
Payment!First Time Home Buyers - 
We can help you buy with Low Money Down, and even Get Cash 
Back!
*All rates are based 
on qualification!
We have programs for 
EVERY 
credit situation!Click here for your FREE RATE QUOTE!
This message is being sent to
you in compliance withBill S. 1618 Title III passed by the 105th US
Congress, which states that this letter can not be considered spam as long as we
include (1) Valid Contact Information and (2)a way to be removed from any
further transmissions at no cost to you by submitting a request to be
removed. . Click Here to Send a Remove Request.
We honor all remove email address requestsimmediately.

Re: serial console

2001-10-18 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA


Hans de Hartog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Something else you might want to try: put
  -P in /boot.config and disconnect your
  keyboard during the BIOS-blabla

/boot.config is obsolete 

No, it isn't obsolete, and it works. And I see no immediate need/plan
to make it obsolete.

and doesn't work with loader(8).

/boot.config is for the boot2 block, not for loader(8).

I'd suggest you write the following line into /boot/loader.conf:
kernel_options=-h
[...]

  console=comconsole

This is meaningful only to the loader itself, AFAIK.

This is wrong. If you set console=comconsole, the kernel will
use the serial console too.

The difference between the two methods, -h in /boot.config and
console=comconsole in /boot/loader.conf, is the timing at which
the serial console is started.

If you put -h in /boot.config, you will get your serial console
working all way through the boot2 block, loader(8), and the kernel.

If you put console=comconsole in /boot/loader.conf, 
the serial console won't get any output until loader(8) encounters
this statment after it initializes itself and prints the first few
lines of opening messages.

So, if you want to have the serial console working as early as
possible, put -h in /boot.config.

Kazu

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: How does FreeBSD performs in server tasks? [off-topic]

2001-10-18 Thread Chris BeHanna

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Conrado Vardanega wrote:

 I would like to hear from Athlon-based server owners/admins how does it
 performs with server tasks. My aim is to find out how good is a Pentium III
 chip for a server instead a low-cost, high-performance Athlon CPU. I would
 consider, for evaluation purposes, a (FreeBSD) system running
 Apache/PHP/mod_ssl and MySQL mainly, because they're pretty sensitive to
 user-response. So, which are the pros and cons of having a Intel based
 server or a AMD based server?

Support for Intel-based chipsets is likely to be more robust than
for the AMD or VIA-based chipsets that exist on Athlon motherboards.
As an example, it took awhile for XFree86 4.1.0 to be fixed to run on
motherboards with the Irongate chipset (AMD 761 north bridge) when a
Radeon QD video board is present.

That said, my 1.333 GHz T-bird *flies*.  I can build all of
userland in around 40 minutes, a kernel in under 5 minutes, and
all of XFree86 4.1.0 in about 20 minutes.  For reference, I have 256MB
of Crucial PC2100 ECC DDR on-board, and my disk is a WD Caviar ATA-66,
5400rpm.  I have the write-caching sysctl enabled.

Getting back to some more specific info you wanted, the only web
app I run that has bearing is Kalendus, and it responds mighty quickly.

 Add-in topic: how DDR-memory instead SDRAM affects server performance?

It *rocks*.

For another benchmark, I pulled 110 MFLOPs from this machine with
the LINPACK benchmarks.

-- 
Chris BeHanna
Software Engineer   (Remove bogus before responding.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: cable modem choices

2001-10-18 Thread Chris BeHanna

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Dennis Mathiasen wrote:

 I haven't been able to locate information on how these things
 actually work.  Apparently the ISP just uses DHCP, but what about
 any authentication?

My ISP expects a certain MAC address.

 Are the modems themselves all functionally the same?  Most
 manufacturers don't say that they work with UNIX.  Is the situation
 the same as with phone modems v. win modems?

No, not usually.  You have RG-6 coming in from the pole to the
cable modem, and CAT-5 coming out from the cable modem to your NIC.
The cable modem doesn't care what OS is on the other end of the patch
cable.

 I'd appreciate any suggestions which one to buy.  Thanks.

As Doug Barton mentioned, you're better off leasing one from the
cable company.  The cable modem sitting beside me, for example, is
$1000 (so I was told).  The lease rate is just built-in to my monthly
access charge ($59.95 for 1500K down/500K up).  Hook up with
dyndns.org and you're good to go.

Oh, to minimize bonehead issues with the installer, you might want
to boot Winblows for when (s)he shows up, just to placate the cable
company, and then boot back into FreeBSD later.  Otherwise, just
convince them that you know what you're doing, and promise to support
yourself.

You'll need something like this in /etc/rc.conf:

ifconfig_dc0=DHCP

(Replace dc0 with the appropriate device for your NIC, e.g., xl0
for 3Com 3C905, fxp0 for Intel Etherexpress, etc.)

Now you'll get an address at boot-time.  I'm not sure, but if your
box is already up when the installer comes,

ifconfig dc0 down
ifconfig dc0 up

(or the equivalent for your NIC)

might also do the trick so that you don't have to reboot.  I don't
actually know, never having tried it.

-- 
Chris BeHanna
Software Engineer   (Remove bogus before responding.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread Garance A Drosihn

At 10:57 AM -0500 10/18/01, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Must one supply any other arguments to newfs in order to enable
dirpref?  A quick look at man newfs didn't make any mention of
dirpref.
  
   No, it's on by default in kernels that include the new code.

Is there a way to check to see if a slice has difpref enabled?

Dirpref is not something which is enabled or disabled, not in
the same sense as softupdates is enabled.

Dirpref is a smarter layout of information in a partition.  You
need a version of the system which knows HOW to do that smarter
layout, and then you just rebuild the partition.  There is no
switch to turn on and off.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn=   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer   or  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteor  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:48:50PM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
 * Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011018 14:40]:
  On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:43:53PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
   On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:20:02PM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:12:46 -0700
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

KK Hi all,
KK 
KK Just a note to those who have updated to 4.4-STABLE that it's well
KK worth doing a backup + newfs + restore on all your UFS volumes.  The

CAVEAT: insert a tunefs -n enable between newfs and restore, without
it the performance improvement is rather less dramatic :)
   
   You can happily skip the tunefs step if you just remember to supply the
   '-U' flag to newfs.
   
   
  Must one supply any other arguments to newfs in order to enable dirpref?
  A quick look at man newfs didn't make any mention of dirpref.
 
 No, it's on by default in kernels that include the new code.
 
Is there a way to check to see if a slice has difpref enabled?

-- 
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   FreeBSD Committer www.FreeBSD.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-10-18 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.

 Dirpref is not something which is enabled or disabled, not in
 the same sense as softupdates is enabled.

 Dirpref is a smarter layout of information in a partition.  You
 need a version of the system which knows HOW to do that smarter
 layout, and then you just rebuild the partition.  There is no
 switch to turn on and off.

I'm not looking to turn if off or on, just to see whether a file system of
mine has that capability in it or if I need to newfs it.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message