Re: linux module broken also with patch
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:14:32PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: > Hello. Today I applied the offered patch for the broken FLEXlm > facility under the Linuxulator. I applied this patch to all of our > systems running FBSD 4.4-STABLE. I recompiled only kernel and loadable > modules and rebooted all machines, but on none the problem went away. > > lmutil lmhostid reports still "" (all machines do have fxp0 > interfaces). ... snip ... > Puhh ... can anyone report similar experiences? No, I can not report a similar experience. The patch worked fine for me. Are you sure you _installed_ the kernel and modules after recompiling them? -- Glenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: mmap busted in 4.3?
Will this patch sort out problems with audio extraction on my A7V-E or A7M266? I get read timeouts in FreeBSD, but it's happy in Win2K. If it's worth a try, can someone mail me with it? Cheers! Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve > O'Hara-Smith > Sent: 05 December 2001 18:06 > To: Steve O'Hara-Smith > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mmap busted in 4.3? > > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 07:05:28 +0100 > "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SOS> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:21:47 +1030 (CST) > SOS> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SOS> > SOS> DO> pressed to get 2 copies correct in a row). However > the patch appears to make > SOS> DO> the machine rather unstable :( > SOS> > SOS> Hmm, mine seems solid as a rock - I've just started a > SOS> make -j2 buildworld loop as a stress test. I'll let you > know in about 12 > SOS> hours. > > Still running fine - I'm hitting ^C. > > -- > C:>WIN | > Directable Mirrors > The computer obeys and wins.|A Better Way > To Focus The Sun > You lose and Bill collects. | licenses > available - see: > | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: 4.4-STABLE crashes - suspects new ata-driver over wd-driver
Here's another "me too". My box just froze when copying a large amount of big files over the network to my machine, causing heavy disc access and lots of interrupts. Curiously I just updated my box to 4.4-STABLE from 4.3-RELEASE and it hasn't occured before. Though in my case the box is quite old (dmesg attached) but is using a relatively new IDE disc. -Richard Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Wed Dec 5 15:54:38 CET 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/BEHOLDER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 167046649 Hz CPU: Pentium/P55C (167.05-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8001bf real memory = 81788928 (79872K bytes) avail memory = 76644352 (74848K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02d8000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc02d809c. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x4000-0x400f,0x374-0x377,0x170-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x6000-0x60ff mem 0xe041-0xe04100ff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:5a:a8:21 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: at 20.0 irq 11 orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc7fff on isa0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000 irq 10 on isa0 ed0: address 00:80:c8:d3:b7:49, type NE2000 (16 bit) IP Filter: v3.4.20 initialized. Default = block all, Logging = enabled ad0: 19574MB [39770/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA2 ata1-master: simplex device, DMA on primary only acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using BIOSPIO Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Re: mmap busted in 4.3?
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 07:05:28 +0100 "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SOS> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:21:47 +1030 (CST) SOS> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SOS> SOS> DO> pressed to get 2 copies correct in a row). However the patch appears to make SOS> DO> the machine rather unstable :( SOS> SOS>Hmm, mine seems solid as a rock - I've just started a SOS> make -j2 buildworld loop as a stress test. I'll let you know in about 12 SOS> hours. Still running fine - I'm hitting ^C. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins.|A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: naive security question
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 05:46:54PM +, Matt Sykes wrote: > My question is: how confident should I be? Is it really worthwhile > for me to spend time setting up tripwire, kernel levels, etc? How > many people are that really that paranoid (paranoia being a good > thing)? I am a software developer (this box is at work), so the more > time I spend developing software the better. Everyone's mileage varies - sometimes a lot. Is your machine inside a firewall? If so, then P(outside attack) goes down significantly for a good firewall configuration. If you are concerned about your co-workers attacking you, then you need to implement the same protections as for an outside attack -- and IMHO to go job-junting. My FreeBSD machine here at work has tripwire installed, and enough password to keep the honest people out. I certainly don't worry about kernel security levels. -- Mike Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired old sysadmin since 1964 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
naive security question
I have a recently cvsupped SMP 4.4-stable running great. ipfilter is: - blocking (all?) spoofs and smurfs - blocking all packets on all ports except: - packets part of inside-initiated tcp/udp/icmp connections - tcp SYN packets on port 22 (ssh) The setup is taken directly from the ipf-howto. So all unwanted packets are dropped except for SYN/22 packets. This leaves me open to SYN flooding and username/password guessing. After some google research, it appears FreeBSD is pretty good at combating the flooding problem. As for username/password guessing, there's not much I can do about that other than picking a 'good' password and checking the logs. Oh and there could be an exploit in OpenSSH. My naive view is that this setup looks -pretty good-. My question is: how confident should I be? Is it really worthwhile for me to spend time setting up tripwire, kernel levels, etc? How many people are that really that paranoid (paranoia being a good thing)? I am a software developer (this box is at work), so the more time I spend developing software the better. Thanks. Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! The competition ends 16 th of December 2001. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
linux module broken also with patch on fxp interfaces
Ups ... I just tested the patch on the DELL P4 (with the 3Com905C xl0 NIC) and with the applied patch, the Linuxulator offers the right ID with lmutil lmhostid for the FLEXlm authentication server. The same patch on the same cvsupdated FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE source (last cvsupdate: today, 3 hours ago from now) has no effect on machines equipted with the fxp0 NIC (all other machines do have Intel EtherExpress 10/100 Pro NICs). It seems to me that the bug is NIC dependend ... :- -- MfG O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:14:32 +0100 (CET) From: "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux module broken also with patch Hello. Today I applied the offered patch for the broken FLEXlm facility under the Linuxulator. I applied this patch to all of our systems running FBSD 4.4-STABLE. I recompiled only kernel and loadable modules and rebooted all machines, but on none the problem went away. lmutil lmhostid reports still "" (all machines do have fxp0 interfaces). Our systems are several SMP machines of different ages (PIII with ServerWorks chipset, PII with older Gigabyte GA6BXD mainboard) and UP systems with Intel P4 and AMD CPUs. The configurations of the SMP machines is similar, those of the UP machines different. All do have fxp0 device except the Dell Precicion 340, it has an 3COM xl NIC. Puhh ... can anyone report similar experiences? Thanks ... -- MfG O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
linux module broken also with patch
Hello. Today I applied the offered patch for the broken FLEXlm facility under the Linuxulator. I applied this patch to all of our systems running FBSD 4.4-STABLE. I recompiled only kernel and loadable modules and rebooted all machines, but on none the problem went away. lmutil lmhostid reports still "" (all machines do have fxp0 interfaces). Our systems are several SMP machines of different ages (PIII with ServerWorks chipset, PII with older Gigabyte GA6BXD mainboard) and UP systems with Intel P4 and AMD CPUs. The configurations of the SMP machines is similar, those of the UP machines different. All do have fxp0 device except the Dell Precicion 340, it has an 3COM xl NIC. Puhh ... can anyone report similar experiences? Thanks ... -- MfG O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
