versioning
Hello, I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC. Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are. What are the other versions? How does one get RC2? Is there a separate prerelease-branch somewhere that I'm missing? --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: versioning
bart - you can likely deduce some answers from: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about. then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels comfortable calling 4.7-RELEASE. so, as you track RELENG_4, you will obtain each tag point sequentially. if you cvsup your sources every day, you will know when RC2 is available because uname -a will show 4.7-RC2. -Adam (10.06.2002 @ 0134 PST): Bart Smit said, in 0.5K: Hello, I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC. Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are. What are the other versions? How does one get RC2? Is there a separate prerelease-branch somewhere that I'm missing? --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message end of versioning from Bart Smit -- Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw. -Lilo, Lilo Stitch Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vectors.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Basically, I got on the plane with a bomb. Basically, I tried to ignite it. Basically, yeah, I intended to damage the plane.
WESTERN PEOPLE, WESTERN GOVERNMENT, DO NOT HELP SADDAM BEING SOFT! IF YOU GO ON WITH YOUR SICK/SOFT UN POLICY YOU WILL FIND THE BOMBERS INSIDE YOUR BUS. WESTERN GOVERNMENT YOUR ELECTORS WILL PUNISH YOU IF YOU HELP SADDAM. SADDAM = WAR TODAY = 100 WARS TOMORROW Basically, I got on the plane with a bomb. Basically, I tried to ignite it. Basically, yeah, I intended to damage the plane. RICHARD REID Four in U.S. Charged in Post-9/11 Plan to Join Al Qaeda Federal officials said they had broken up a terrorist cell in Portland, Ore., arresting four native-born citizens accused of plotting to join with Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters. Association of assirian countrymen Bat-Nac Aims and Tasks of organization: Active contribution to the revival, preservation, development of assirian culture, propaganda among population of historical heritage of assirian people of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Leader of organization: Bat-Nac Phone: 113 27 27 Date of registration: 05.03.79 This is nor Spam write back to us for removal. Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'REMOVE ME PLEASE AS A SUBJECT' Study assirian,Be Proud of being! http://www.acl.edu.au/choose_lang_ass.html Our assirian page went on top of all the searchs consulting the Traffic Security Experts: http://www.msn.com/ + Security Traffic Expert http://search.msn.com/results.asp?q=security+traffic+expertorigq=traffic+ex pertRS=CHECKEDFORM=SMCRTv=1cfg=SMCINITIALnosp=0thr=submitbutton.x=32 submitbutton.y=16 WESTERN GOVERNMENT: YOUR ELECTORS WILL PUNISH YOU IF YOU HELP SADDAM. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: versioning
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Adam Weinberger wrote: AW you can likely deduce some answers from: AW http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html AW AW 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about. AW then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots AW that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels comfortable AW calling 4.7-RELEASE. Yeah, this is true, except the following... AW so, as you track RELENG_4, you will obtain each tag point sequentially. AW if you cvsup your sources every day, you will know when RC2 is available AW because uname -a will show 4.7-RC2. Which is not. uname of the system is determined by /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.h; -RC[n] are never been CVS tags, they are specifically set on machines which build release candidates. Summarizing: if you follow sources via cvs/cvsup/other way, you'd never got -RCn. You got, for last month, 4.6-STABLE, then 4.7-PRERELEASE, then 4.7-RC (without numbers), then, finally, 4.7-STABLE. However, you'd *never* got 4.7-RELEASE, because this specific tag will be set on a security branch named RELENG_4_7 (which is created shortly before actual release). Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Traffic shaping
Hi all, I could do with some hints regarding traffic shaping. My homenetwork is hooked up to an assymetrical (1536/256) ADSL line, using a FreeBSD 4.6 system which provides the usual NAT/Gateway/Firewall services. I'm using dummynet to control the amount of bandwidth used by certain hosts on the network, which all works fine. However, I still suffer from latency when the maximum up- and/or downstream of the line is being utilized. If I understand it well, this happens because the buffer in the ADSL modem fills up completely at those occasions. Is there anyway to prevent this from happening? Ta, -- Maarten de Vries http://unsavoury.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Traffic shaping
## Maarten de Vries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I could do with some hints regarding traffic shaping. My homenetwork is hooked up to an assymetrical (1536/256) ADSL line, using a FreeBSD 4.6 system which provides the usual NAT/Gateway/Firewall services. I'm using dummynet to control the amount of bandwidth used by certain hosts on the network, which all works fine. However, I still suffer from latency when the maximum up- and/or downstream of the line is being utilized. If I understand it well, this happens because the buffer in the ADSL modem fills up completely at those occasions. Is there anyway to prevent this from happening? Limit the maximum usage of your line to about 90% to 95%. This prevents usage of the queue in your modem. However, this will not work if queueing on the remote side is the problem (bulk transfers like downloads come to mind); you are out of luck if the queue on the remote side is too long. Regards, cmt -- Spare Space To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
[no subject]
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
After cvsup, can't send mails
Hi ALL ! I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3) $mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED] lala . EOF collect: Cannot write ./dfg96BQ1u6000293 (bfcommit, uid=1000, gid 25):Permission denied queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfg96BQ1u6000293, uid=1000; Permission denied To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: After cvsup, can't send mails
Have you created the sendmail submission user? smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:37PM +0400, Ruslan Sulemanov wrote: Hi ALL ! I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3) $mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED] lala . EOF collect: Cannot write ./dfg96BQ1u6000293 (bfcommit, uid=1000, gid 25):Permission denied queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfg96BQ1u6000293, uid=1000; Permission denied To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- ___ A.G. Russell IV KC5KFDThe Knife Company e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 479-631-0055 FAX 479-631-8734 Old Klingon Saying -- 'oH majQa' yIn je bang, Qo' bang --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re[2]: After cvsup, can't send mails
No. :-) Thanks. AGRI Have you created the sendmail submission user? AGRI smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin AGRI On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:37PM +0400, Ruslan Sulemanov wrote: Hi ALL ! I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3) $mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED] lala . EOF collect: Cannot write ./dfg96BQ1u6000293 (bfcommit, uid=1000, gid 25):Permission denied queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfg96BQ1u6000293, uid=1000; Permission denied To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Traffic shaping
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 22:56, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: Limit the maximum usage of your line to about 90% to 95%. This prevents usage of the queue in your modem. However, this will not work if queueing on the remote side is the problem (bulk transfers like downloads come to mind); you are out of luck if the queue on the remote side is too long. Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed. I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up from ~40 to ~100 but it is still acceptable) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re[2]: After cvsup, can't send mails
Yes i have. This user exist, $cat /etc/passwd smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin AGRI Have you created the sendmail submission user? AGRI smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin AGRI On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:37PM +0400, Ruslan Sulemanov wrote: Hi ALL ! I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3) $mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED] lala . EOF collect: Cannot write ./dfg96BQ1u6000293 (bfcommit, uid=1000, gid 25):Permission denied queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfg96BQ1u6000293, uid=1000; Permission denied To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Traffic shaping
## Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed. I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up from ~40 to ~100 but it is still acceptable) How much do you have to limit TCP for the desired effect? I never tried shaping on asymmetric lines, and the traffic ratio for a single TCP bulk transfer (1500 (or little less in case of PPPoE, PPTP, etc.) bytes incoming vs. 40 bytes outgoing) does not match the up/down-ratio of his line (1:6) by any means. Regards, cmt -- Spare Space To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
