RE: Upgrade from 4.6-STABLE (July) to 4.7-STABLE loses SCSI card?

2002-11-28 Thread Long, Scott
 
 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Scott Long wrote:
 
  Even though the ServeRAID card isn't supported (yet), it 
 would be interesting
  to put it in and see what pciconf says about it.  If it 
 doesn't show up
  there either, then it's pretty good proof of a PCI problem.
 
 Okay, it doesn't show up either:
 
 nemesis# pciconf -vl | wc -l
   41
 nemesis# wc -l with_serveraid
   41 with_serveraid
 
 Now, stupid question ... but would I at least see *something* 
 if it was an
 IRQ conflict?
 

The fact that it doesn't show up in pciconf means that FreeBSD
does not see it within the PCI config space at all.  This 
strengthens my suspicion of a PCI problem.  Why it worked
before and not now is beyond me.  Maybe someone with more PCIBIOS
experience would have an idea here.  Are there any system BIOS
settings that have changed recently or could possibly be
experimented with?  Trying the 5.0-DP2 CD might work also, but
I wouldn't advise using it in production yet.

Scott

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Overlooking something, but what? (missing 39160 controller)

2002-11-28 Thread Wolfgang Zenker
 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
 Server is an IBM xSeries 360 ... only slot'd card is the 39160, everything
 else is onboard ... the card is in the same 64bit slot that it was in when
 it worked originally, but I have tested other slots and the same results
 ...

 Most likely FreeBSD is not enumerating the PCI bus that the card is attached
 to.  Those that have tweaked the chipset drivers may be able to point you
 in the right direction.  You should tell the list what chipset FreeBSD
 finds on the system.

 'K, you'll have to help me out here ... not sure what chipset you are
 looking for, but my dmesg shows:
 [..]

If you have the box working under linux, could you give us the output of
a lspci -v?

Wolfgang

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: how to control S.M.A.R.T. under FreeBSD ???

2002-11-28 Thread Eduard Martinescu
Vladislav,

I am in the process of porting the Smartmon tools
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/smartmontools/) to FreeBSD.  I am currently
waiting for Soren Schmidt to commit some changes to the ATA driver to
support the SMART ATAPI commands.  Then I can finish work on the port.

Ed

- Original Message -
From: Vladislav V. Zhuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: how to control S.M.A.R.T. under FreeBSD ???


 Hi!

 Last time IDE HDD often break. And I very need tool for monitoring
 S.M.A.R.T. my HDD to prevent loss data with broken harddrive.

 How I can to control S.M.A.R.T. under FreeBSD ???

 --
 Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Temporary solution to IBM/PCI issue ...

2002-11-28 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On a whim, I checked the motherboard in my desktop machine ... she has two
64bit slots, and booting up with the card in recognizes it ... am going to
things running with that motherboard to get me past the panic, and then
start looking again at the IBM issue ...

I have a linux guy here inhouse, so once I get the server back live,
I'll get him to give me a hand to get that lsinf command run under Linux
and report back on what it says ...

The problem isn't fixed, only reduced in priority for a copule of hours
...




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Help needed debugging hard lock (SMP-related)

2002-11-28 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:07, Craig Boston wrote:
 (kgdb) print pidhashtbl[73508  pidhash].lh_first-p_pid
 $21 = 73508

Argh!  I must be losing my mind or something.  I swear there really WAS
text above this before I hit send :)  Anyway, it SHOULD have read
something like the following:

Sorry for replying to myself.  I decided to try to determine where the
one process in the RUN state (PID 73508) might be stuck, if indeed this
process is what caused the freeze.  After learning the basics of kgdb, I
coaxed this out of my vmcore:


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Recreating vinum device ...

2002-11-28 Thread Marc G. Fournier

Okay, I need to confirm this before I run it, cause if it doesn't work,
I'm royally screwed ...

The old server, the drives on the controller I couldn't bring up had a
vinum RAID5 device on it ... I have the original config file that I used
to create that ...

If I run 'vinum create -f config file' and don't run newfs, will I still
end up toasting the RAID5 array, or is this safe?  What happens if I
inadvertently reversed the drives?  Is there some way that I need to be
doing this that I'm not seein gin the vinum man page?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Recreating vinum device ...

2002-11-28 Thread Marc G. Fournier

Got it *wipe brow*  Kudos to he who developed vinum, brow is still a wee
damp, but the man page is great and figured out that create is not the way
to go :)


On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:


 Okay, I need to confirm this before I run it, cause if it doesn't work,
 I'm royally screwed ...

 The old server, the drives on the controller I couldn't bring up had a
 vinum RAID5 device on it ... I have the original config file that I used
 to create that ...

 If I run 'vinum create -f config file' and don't run newfs, will I still
 end up toasting the RAID5 array, or is this safe?  What happens if I
 inadvertently reversed the drives?  Is there some way that I need to be
 doing this that I'm not seein gin the vinum man page?




 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Sendmail question

2002-11-28 Thread Erick Mechler
:: Since sendmail 8.12 (4.6), I couldn't send anymore a mail locally on my
:: private network. The mail is redirected to my external router (which have a
:: fully qualified domain name).

It sounds like you're defining SMART_HOST in your .mc file which sends all
outgoing mail to go to a central relay site.  However, without actually 
looking at your .mc file, it's hard to say for sure.

Cheers - Erick

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Recreating vinum device ...

2002-11-28 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Thursday, 28 November 2002 at 16:26:09 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:


 Okay, I need to confirm this before I run it, cause if it doesn't work,
 I'm royally screwed ...

 The old server, the drives on the controller I couldn't bring up had a
 vinum RAID5 device on it ... I have the original config file that I used
 to create that ...

 If I run 'vinum create -f config file' and don't run newfs, will I still
 end up toasting the RAID5 array, or is this safe?  What happens if I
 inadvertently reversed the drives?  Is there some way that I need to be
 doing this that I'm not seein gin the vinum man page?

 Got it *wipe brow* Kudos to he who developed vinum, brow is still a
 wee damp, but the man page is great and figured out that create is
 not the way to go :)

JOOI, what happened, and how did you fix it?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



4.7-release-2002.11.14.02.05.57 - spontaneous reboot possibly related to modem/pccard/ppp

2002-11-28 Thread parv
so far i had experienced 2 spontaneous reboots on freebsd
4.7-release-2002.11.14.02.05.57 (on dell inspiron 5000e).

after being connected to internet (user ppp) via linksys pcmlm56
modem (on sio1) for say 2-3 minutes, card removed message comes
(despite that it's still connected); messages follow indicating that
the card has been found (even though card remain untouched through
out the process)...

  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:48 moo pccardd[60]: sio1: Linksys (EtherFast 10100 + 56K 
PC Card (PCMLM56)) removed.
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:54 moo pccardd[60]: Card Linksys(EtherFast 10100 + 56K 
PC Card (PCMLM56)) [(null)] [(
  Linksys (EtherFast 10100 + 56K PC Card (PCMLM56)) [(null)] [(null)] 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:54 moo pccardd[60]: Found existing driver (sio) for 
Linksys 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:54 moo pccardd[60]: Using I/O addr 0x2f8, size 8 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:54 moo pccardd[60]: Using I/O addr 0x300, size 32 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:32:54 moo pccardd[60]: Setting config reg at offs 0xffe0 to 
0x43, Reset time = 900 ms 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:33:00 moo pccardd[60]: Assigning I/O window 0, start 0x2f8, 
size 0x8 flags 0x7 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:33:00 moo pccardd[60]: Assigning I/O window 1, start 0x300, 
size 0x20 flags 0x7 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:33:00 moo pccardd[60]: Assign sio1, io 0x2f8-0x2ff, mem 0x0, 
0 bytes, irq 11, flags 0 
  moo /kernel: Nov 28 21:33:00 moo pccardd[60]: sio1: Linksys (EtherFast 10100 + 56K 
PC Card (PCMLM56)) inserted.


...then machine hangs, preparing for reboot (/tmp is mounted on mfs)...

  Nov 28 21:38:13 moo /kernel: swapon: adding /dev/ad0s2b as swap device
  Nov 28 21:38:13 moo /kernel: Automatic boot in progress...
  Nov 28 21:38:13 moo /kernel: Warning: Block size and bytes per inode restrict 
cylinders per group to 92.
  Nov 28 21:38:13 moo /kernel: Warning: inode blocks/cyl group (125) = data blocks 
(37) in last
  Nov 28 21:38:13 moo /kernel: cylinder group. This implies 1200 sector(s) cannot be 
allocated.


...any ideas?  i don't know how significant this is, but this type
of spontaneous reboot has had happened only when working on 2
batteries.

below are possibly relevant files...

  kernel:
http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/cf/freebsd/KERNCONF

  dmesg (2002.10.22.03.43.30, will update asap):
http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/err/dmesg/delli5000e-dmesg

  /etc/pccard.conf:
http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/cf/network/pccard.pcmlm56


  - parv

-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: Recreating vinum device ...

2002-11-28 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:

 On Thursday, 28 November 2002 at 16:26:09 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
  On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 
 
  Okay, I need to confirm this before I run it, cause if it doesn't work,
  I'm royally screwed ...
 
  The old server, the drives on the controller I couldn't bring up had a
  vinum RAID5 device on it ... I have the original config file that I used
  to create that ...
 
  If I run 'vinum create -f config file' and don't run newfs, will I still
  end up toasting the RAID5 array, or is this safe?  What happens if I
  inadvertently reversed the drives?  Is there some way that I need to be
  doing this that I'm not seein gin the vinum man page?
 
  Got it *wipe brow* Kudos to he who developed vinum, brow is still a
  wee damp, but the man page is great and figured out that create is
  not the way to go :)

 JOOI, what happened, and how did you fix it?

We had an IBM xSeries server that FreeBSD lost its ability to recognize
the 39160 dual channel controller that we had 14 drives sitting on ... we
moved the hardware to another, non-IBM machine (ie. my desktop), which all
the hardware show'd up on, but, in the excitement, we didn't think to mark
the cables as to which channel was which, and, of course, my desktop
didn't have the appropriate /dev/vinum devices ...

now, I notice(d) that the drives appear to store their own information
internally, which the dumpconfig was able to show up ... if I had plugged
the channels in wrong (ie. da0 - da7, da7 - d0), what would have
happened had I run 'vinum start'?  would it know to arrange the drives
properly regardless, or would I risk screwin gmy file system? ::(




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: 4.7-release-2002.11.14.02.05.57 - spontaneous reboot possibly related to modem/pccard/ppp

2002-11-28 Thread parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote parv thusly...

 so far i had experienced 2 spontaneous reboots on freebsd
 4.7-release-2002.11.14.02.05.57 (on dell inspiron 5000e).
 
 after being connected to internet (user ppp) via linksys pcmlm56
 modem (on sio1) for say 2-3 minutes, card removed message comes
 (despite that it's still connected); messages follow indicating that
 the card has been found (even though card remain untouched through
 out the process)...
...
 http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/cf/freebsd/KERNCONF
 http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/err/dmesg/delli5000e-dmesg
 http://parv.holy.cow/parv/comp/unix/cf/network/pccard.pcmlm56

sorry, i didn't realise that holy.cow domain exists only in the mind
of my machine.  below are the correct ones, for sure i promise...

  kernel:
http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/cf/freebsd/KERNCONF

  dmesg:
http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/err/dmesg/delli5000e-dmesg

  /etc/pccard.conf:
http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/cf/network/pccard.pcmlm56


  - parv

-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message