Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 01:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > bdb_hash, then run portsdb -fu - works for me, so that also points to be some > bug in bdb1. Hrm. I thought bdb1 btrees were well known to be buggy, to be honest. (I had a feeling it was going to turn out to be this issue as soon as someone reported that configuring portupgrade to use bdb_hash fixed it.) -- brandon s. allbery[linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [WAY too many hats][EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:13, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I think the problem is really in bdb > (which ruby is calling for database-work), and not in ruby itself. You can actually change the database backend manually: Install databases/ruby-bdb and set the envvar PORTS_DBDRIVER to bdb_btree or bdb_hash, then run portsdb -fu - works for me, so that also points to be some bug in bdb1. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org pgpARu9iZOhcU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
At 10:49 PM -0400 9/6/04, Sahil Tandon wrote: kstewart wrote: There is a bug in ruby that shows up as a bus error. Follow the topic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are several ways to alter the INDEX[-5] so that it occurs less frequently. Occurs less frequently? That's not what I'm looking for. Is there a *fix* for the root cause? Oddly enough, there are a lot of other people who would also prefer a more complete fix. If we had a fix, we would install it and you wouldn't have to work around the problem. There are developers who are looking into the problem. I think the problem is really in bdb (which ruby is calling for database-work), and not in ruby itself. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Programmer or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteor [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
On Monday 06 September 2004 07:49 pm, Sahil Tandon wrote: > kstewart wrote: > > There is a bug in ruby that shows up as a bus error. Follow the topic on > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are several ways to alter the INDEX[-5] so that it occurs > > less frequently. > > Occurs less frequently? That's not what I'm looking for. Is there a > *fix* for the root cause? I haven't seen one. I have seen comments but when ruby is updated, you will probably be seeing a fix. > > > I started using portindexdb because it doesn't error off. I also don't > > use categories, which it doesn't produce. > > I'm using portsindexsb as a work around, but it still doesn't address or > solve the problem which makes portsdb -Uu fail. I've tried removing and > re-extracting the ports tree and doing whatever else was suggested in > the -ports@ mailing list(s) - to no avail. > I am also running portindexdb for that reason. For what I use INDEX-5.db for, portindexdb works just fine. We may have to wait until the port freeze is over. So far, I am only having to use in on my RELENG_5 machine. It cvsups port-all 2x a day as a cronjob and moving a "#" from one command ot another in the script isn't much work :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html Support the Bison at http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
kstewart wrote: There is a bug in ruby that shows up as a bus error. Follow the topic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are several ways to alter the INDEX[-5] so that it occurs less frequently. Occurs less frequently? That's not what I'm looking for. Is there a *fix* for the root cause? I started using portindexdb because it doesn't error off. I also don't use categories, which it doesn't produce. I'm using portsindexsb as a work around, but it still doesn't address or solve the problem which makes portsdb -Uu fail. I've tried removing and re-extracting the ports tree and doing whatever else was suggested in the -ports@ mailing list(s) - to no avail. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re[2]: FreeBSD 5.x under VMware ESX server.
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:57:12 +0900 - Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > vivek> I have in the past run FreeBSD 5.0 under VMWare workstation software. > > Which VMware version? Did you still see it on the latest vesrion 4.5.2? ESX server 2.1.0 Mvh/Best regards, Arnvid L. Karstad ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump
I had to download a fresh ports.tar.gz (and extract it). Then portsdb -Uu works. Cheers Günther ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5.x under VMware ESX server.
vivek> I have in the past run FreeBSD 5.0 under VMWare workstation software. Which VMware version? Did you still see it on the latest vesrion 4.5.2? -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
