Re: make mplayer failed
On Mon, 21 May 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Vladimir Botka wrote:
Dne Sun, 20 May 2007 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 17/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is my error message
onfigure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.12.0
atk >=
1.9.0
pa
ngo >= 1.12.0cairo >= 1.2.0) were not met:
No package 'atk' found
Requested 'cairo >= 1.2.0' but version of cairo is 1.0.2
[...]
cd /usr/ports/accessibility
ls -ld atk*
bsd@/root# cd /usr/ports/accessibility
bsd@/root# ls -ld atk*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 19 19:10 atk
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 21 13:03 atk-reference
bsd@/root#
check.
After updating the ports collection you need something like
#portupgrade -arRpP
-vlado
i thought this was a fatal error (see below) but it is actually
continuing to compile now:
rver)
---> Fetching xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1
[..]
---> Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server'
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
in make.conf.
On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set
variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
i am living in startx with no visual browser (unless somebody tells me
how to get one.) at least i have multiple xterms that have a compatible
TERM type to my pine and the ability to implement root commands and
cut and paste the output.
another one of this intermittant errors. this command u gave me
seems pretty powerful. hope this can all be ignored.
--> Skipping xorg-libraries-7.2 (already installed)
---> Fetching diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4.tbz:
[..]
*** Error code 1
Stop.
6.5.3_1,2.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/dri-6.5.3_1,2.tbz
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/dri-6.5.3_1,2.tgz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/dri-6.5.3_1,2.tgz
** Failed to fetch dri-6.5.3_1,2
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! dri-6.5.3_1,2 (fetch error)
---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
** Could not find the latest version (6.5.3_1,2)
---> Using the port instead of a package
---> Upgrading 'dri-6.2.1,2' to 'dri-6.5.3_1,2' (graphics/dri)
---> Building '/usr/ports/graphics/dri'
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
in make.conf.
On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set
variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
---> Packaging 'dri-6.2.1,2' as dependency
Creating package /usr/ports/packages/All/dri-6.2.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - difference?
Patrick M. Hausen wrote this message on Mon, May 21, 2007 at 15:18 +0200: > Hi, all! > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:36:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Are the disk sizes exactly the same in both cases? Please > > provide dmesg output from the 2nd case (native SATA). > > Good point ;-) But ... > > P-ATA emulation: > > atapci0: port > 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb80f mem > 0xff3fe000-0xff3f irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 > ata2: on atapci0 > ata3: on atapci0 > ad4: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable > ad4: 157066MB at ata2-master UDMA33 > ad6: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable > ad6: 157066MB at ata3-master UDMA33 > > Native S-ATA: > > atapci0: port > 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb80f mem > 0xff3fe000-0xff3f irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 > ata2: on atapci0 > ata3: on atapci0 > ad4: 157066MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 157066MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > I don't see a difference here that could be the root cause of the > problem. > > Besides, I'm using ad4s1 and ad6s1 as the providers for > gmirror, so a few sectors plus/minus at the very end of the > raw disk should not matter. That doesn't show the exact size... run diskinfo on each of them and that will tell you the reported to geom size.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make mplayer failed
On Mon, 21 May 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Vladimir Botka wrote:
Dne Sun, 20 May 2007 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 17/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is my error message
onfigure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.12.0
atk >=
1.9.0
pa
ngo >= 1.12.0cairo >= 1.2.0) were not met:
No package 'atk' found
Requested 'cairo >= 1.2.0' but version of cairo is 1.0.2
[...]
cd /usr/ports/accessibility
ls -ld atk*
bsd@/root# cd /usr/ports/accessibility
bsd@/root# ls -ld atk*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 19 19:10 atk
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 21 13:03 atk-reference
bsd@/root#
check.
After updating the ports collection you need something like
#portupgrade -arRpP
-vlado
i thought this was a fatal error (see below) but it is actually
continuing to compile now:
rver)
---> Fetching xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1
[..]
---> Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server'
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE
by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in
make.conf.
On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set
variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
i am living in startx with no visual browser (unless somebody tells me
how to get one.) at least i have multiple xterms that have a compatible
TERM type to my pine and the ability to implement root commands and
cut and paste the output.
another one of this intermittant errors. this command u gave me
seems pretty powerful. hope this can all be ignored.
--> Skipping xorg-libraries-7.2 (already installed)
---> Fetching diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4.tbz
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4.tgz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4.tgz
** Failed to fetch diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4 (fetch error)
---> Packages processed: 1 done, 67 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
** Could not find the latest version (1.7.0_1)
---> Using the port instead of a package
---> Upgrading 'apache-ant-1.6.5_2' to 'apache-ant-1.7.0_1'
(devel/apache-ant)
---> Building '/usr/ports/devel/apache-ant'
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
in make.conf.
On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set
variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make mplayer failed
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Vladimir Botka wrote:
Dne Sun, 20 May 2007 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Christian Walther wrote:
On 17/05/07, KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is my error message
onfigure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.12.0
atk >=
1.9.0
pa
ngo >= 1.12.0cairo >= 1.2.0) were not met:
No package 'atk' found
Requested 'cairo >= 1.2.0' but version of cairo is 1.0.2
[...]
cd /usr/ports/accessibility
ls -ld atk*
bsd@/root# cd /usr/ports/accessibility
bsd@/root# ls -ld atk*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 19 19:10 atk
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 21 13:03 atk-reference
bsd@/root#
check.
After updating the ports collection you need something like
#portupgrade -arRpP
-vlado
i thought this was a fatal error (see below) but it is actually
continuing to compile now:
rver)
---> Fetching xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1.tbz
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1.tgz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1.tgz
** Failed to fetch xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1 (fetch error)
---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
** Could not find the latest version (1.2.0_2,1)
---> Using the port instead of a package
---> Upgrading 'xorg-server-6.8.2' to 'xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1'
(x11-servers/xorg-server)
---> Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server'
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
in make.conf.
On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set
variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
i am living in startx with no visual browser (unless somebody tells me
how to get one.) at least i have multiple xterms that have a compatible
TERM type to my pine and the ability to implement root commands and
cut and paste the output.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
Bob Bishop wrote: On 21 May 2007, at 12:52, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, On 21 May 2007, at 10:07, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured From the output below, assuming the system is running OK, the RAID doesn't need rebuilding. The BIOS is just confused about the state of the array, it will probably still boot from it OK. Yes, it boots OK but the RAID need rebuilding. This status is result of disconnecting the second disk, booting, create some files and then reconnect the second disk. [etc] OK. You need to follow the steps in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/raid.html section 18.4.3. Be careful to detach/reattach the right disk :-) When the rebuild has finished you may find that the BIOS doesn't realize the array has been rebuilt, but that may not matter (much). After rebuilding the bios shows 'Normal' status. It seems that the ata-raid driver can't detect when the array need rebuilding. Thanks for your help -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - difference?
Hi, all! On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:36:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Are the disk sizes exactly the same in both cases? Please > provide dmesg output from the 2nd case (native SATA). Good point ;-) But ... P-ATA emulation: atapci0: port 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb80f mem 0xff3fe000-0xff3f irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ad4: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable ad4: 157066MB at ata2-master UDMA33 ad6: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable ad6: 157066MB at ata3-master UDMA33 Native S-ATA: atapci0: port 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb80f mem 0xff3fe000-0xff3f irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ad4: 157066MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 157066MB at ata3-master SATA150 I don't see a difference here that could be the root cause of the problem. Besides, I'm using ad4s1 and ad6s1 as the providers for gmirror, so a few sectors plus/minus at the very end of the raw disk should not matter. Thanks, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Vorholzstr. 25 * 76137 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
On 21 May 2007, at 12:52, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, On 21 May 2007, at 10:07, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured From the output below, assuming the system is running OK, the RAID doesn't need rebuilding. The BIOS is just confused about the state of the array, it will probably still boot from it OK. Yes, it boots OK but the RAID need rebuilding. This status is result of disconnecting the second disk, booting, create some files and then reconnect the second disk. [etc] OK. You need to follow the steps in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/ en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/raid.html section 18.4.3. Be careful to detach/reattach the right disk :-) When the rebuild has finished you may find that the BIOS doesn't realize the array has been rebuilt, but that may not matter (much). -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - difference?
Patrick M. Hausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a Tyan barebone on my desk that is based on the > ServerWorks HT1000 chipset. It features 4 SATA connectors > and 4 hot plug drive bays. > > I installed FreeBSD on the system with the BIOS settings as > set by the manufacturer. This includes setting the "SATA mode" > to "P-ATA emulation". > > The devices are probed by FreeBSD like this: > [...] > I set up a GEOM mirror on my boot disk, again, everythings working > as expected: > [...] > Out of curiosity I changed the BIOS setup setting for the > SATA controller to "native SATA". > > When booting, the controller and all disks are probed OK. > The output shows "SATA150" for the devices. > > Yet, the root filesystem on /dev/mirror/gm0s1 cannot be found. > Hitting "?" at the prompt that asks for manual root dev specification, > I get "ad4, ad4s1, ad4s1a ... ad6, ad6s1, ad6s1a ...". I can even > boot ad4s1 to single user mode, so all data on the disk can be > read just like when in "P-ATA emulation" mode. > > Why does gmirror fail to load? Are the disk sizes exactly the same in both cases? Please provide dmesg output from the 2nd case (native SATA). Most GEOM modules (gmirror, gjournal etc.) store their meta data in the last sector of the device. If the size of the devices change when you change the emulation mode, gmirror won't be able to locate the sector that contains the meta data anymore. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "anyone new to programming should be kept as far from C++ as possible; actually showing the stuff should be considered a criminal offence" -- Jacek Generowicz ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
PR kern/102211
Hi, is anyone, in particular sos@, working on commiting this patch or at least considering it? It would help a lot to have it incorporated. As per my testing, using it solves the panic situation I've been seeing otherwise after one of disks in ICH(7|8) RAID has failed. Thanks a lot otis -- Sincerely yours, Juraj Lutter ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, On 21 May 2007, at 10:07, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured From the output below, assuming the system is running OK, the RAID doesn't need rebuilding. The BIOS is just confused about the state of the array, it will probably still boot from it OK. Yes, it boots OK but the RAID need rebuilding. This status is result of disconnecting the second disk, booting, create some files and then reconnect the second disk. [I've got a system with Intel ESB2 in the same state, anyone who knows how to make the BIOS see sense (short of a full rebuild) please tell.] I run 6.2-STABLE: dmesg: ... atapci1: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe880-0xe883,0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe41f mem 0xfebff800-0xfebf irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected ata5: on atapci1 ata6: on atapci1 ata7: on atapci1 ata8: on atapci1 ata9: on atapci1 ata10: on atapci1 ... ad10: 152627MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 152627MB at ata6-master SATA300 ar0: 152625MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad10 at ata5-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad12 at ata6-master pciconf -lv: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2:class=0x010400 card=0x81ec1043 chip=0x28228086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = mass storage subclass = RAID atacontrol status ar0: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad10 ad12 status: READY The motherboard is Asus P5-E. How to rebuild my RAID? Thanks in advance ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
Hi, On 21 May 2007, at 10:07, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured From the output below, assuming the system is running OK, the RAID doesn't need rebuilding. The BIOS is just confused about the state of the array, it will probably still boot from it OK. [I've got a system with Intel ESB2 in the same state, anyone who knows how to make the BIOS see sense (short of a full rebuild) please tell.] I run 6.2-STABLE: dmesg: ... atapci1: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe880-0xe883,0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe41f mem 0xfebff800-0xfebf irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected ata5: on atapci1 ata6: on atapci1 ata7: on atapci1 ata8: on atapci1 ata9: on atapci1 ata10: on atapci1 ... ad10: 152627MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 152627MB at ata6-master SATA300 ar0: 152625MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad10 at ata5-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad12 at ata6-master pciconf -lv: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2:class=0x010400 card=0x81ec1043 chip=0x28228086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = mass storage subclass = RAID atacontrol status ar0: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad10 ad12 status: READY The motherboard is Asus P5-E. How to rebuild my RAID? Thanks in advance ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable- [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
Hi I personally would say its a major mistake to use these pseudo-hardware controllers. I really recommend you either use software-raid via gvinum or buy a true full-capable hardware raid controller. cheers Krassimir Slavchev wrote: Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured I run 6.2-STABLE: dmesg: ... atapci1: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe880-0xe883,0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe41f mem 0xfebff800-0xfebf irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected ata5: on atapci1 ata6: on atapci1 ata7: on atapci1 ata8: on atapci1 ata9: on atapci1 ata10: on atapci1 ... ad10: 152627MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 152627MB at ata6-master SATA300 ar0: 152625MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad10 at ata5-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad12 at ata6-master pciconf -lv: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2:class=0x010400 card=0x81ec1043 chip=0x28228086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = mass storage subclass = RAID atacontrol status ar0: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad10 ad12 status: READY The motherboard is Asus P5-E. How to rebuild my RAID? Thanks in advance ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Georg 'Therion' Bege http://coruscant.info http://www.ninth-art.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x5717E214 FingerPrint: A8EC B4B2 C9A9 483B CC87 56EE 07A1 C78E 5717 E214 !DSPAM:465172ad25448062420477! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Intel Matrix RAID (ICH8R) rebuild?
Hello, I have problems rebuilding RAID1 array. The bios shows status 'Rebuild' and 'Volumes with "Rebuild" status will be rebuilt within the operating system'. When I try to do 'atacontrol rebuild ar0': atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATARAIDREBUILD): Device not configured I run 6.2-STABLE: dmesg: ... atapci1: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe880-0xe883,0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe41f mem 0xfebff800-0xfebf irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected ata5: on atapci1 ata6: on atapci1 ata7: on atapci1 ata8: on atapci1 ata9: on atapci1 ata10: on atapci1 ... ad10: 152627MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 152627MB at ata6-master SATA300 ar0: 152625MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad10 at ata5-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad12 at ata6-master pciconf -lv: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2:class=0x010400 card=0x81ec1043 chip=0x28228086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = mass storage subclass = RAID atacontrol status ar0: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad10 ad12 status: READY The motherboard is Asus P5-E. How to rebuild my RAID? Thanks in advance ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
