Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:29:40PM +0200, FLEURIOT Damien wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:13:45PM +0200 or thereabouts, John Hay wrote: > > > > I have not used jails with link-local addresses, only global addresses > > and that works. It looks like you did not specify the whole link-local > > address in the jail_*_ip line. You need to add the %interface for a > > proper ipv6 link-local address, eg. fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252. Not everything > > works with link-local addresses though and jail might be one of them. > > > > John > > -- > > John Hay -- j...@meraka.csir.co.za / j...@freebsd.org > > > Thanks for the hint John, I just tried by appending the interface % > and it still won't work any better: > > rc.conf: > jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252" > > jls -v output doesn't change. > ifconfig output within the jail doesn't change. > ifconfig output on the host's lo252 doesn't change. > > I'm afraid I don't have spare IP6s to assign to my public interface > so I can't test much more. You can use site-local (fec0::) or rfc4193 addresses for testing. John -- John Hay -- j...@meraka.csir.co.za / j...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:13:45PM +0200 or thereabouts, John Hay wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Major Domo wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > > > Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web > > and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem. > > > > I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't > > take the IP6 I give it. > > > > > > Uname: > > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE > > > > > > Sysctl jail MIBs: > > security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 > > security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 > > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 > > security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 > > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 0 > > > > > > /etc/rc.conf settings: > > jail_enable="YES" > > jail_set_hostname_allow="NO" > > jail_list="ns" > > jail_ns_interface="lo252" > > jail_ns_hostname="[snip]" > > jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc" > > jail_ns_rootdir="/var/jail/ns" > > jail_ns_devfs_enable="YES" > > > > > > jls -v: > >JID Hostname Path > > Name State > > CPUSetID > > IP Address(es) > > 23 [snip] /var/jail/ns > > ALIVE > > 2 > > 192.168.0.252 > > fe80::c0a8:fc > > > > > > ifconfig lo252 from the host: > > lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > > inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x > > inet6 fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x5 > > > > > > ifconfig from the jail: > > re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > > > options=389b > > ether 00:e0:f4:19:e9:d2 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > > pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33204 > > lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > > inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x > > > > > > ping6 from the host: > > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 --> fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 > > 16 bytes from fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.082 ms > > > > > > I fail to see what could be going wrong :( > > > > Any pointers please ? > > I have not used jails with link-local addresses, only global addresses > and that works. It looks like you did not specify the whole link-local > address in the jail_*_ip line. You need to add the %interface for a > proper ipv6 link-local address, eg. fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252. Not everything > works with link-local addresses though and jail might be one of them. > > John > -- > John Hay -- j...@meraka.csir.co.za / j...@freebsd.org Thanks for the hint John, I just tried by appending the interface % and it still won't work any better: rc.conf: jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252" jls -v output doesn't change. ifconfig output within the jail doesn't change. ifconfig output on the host's lo252 doesn't change. I'm afraid I don't have spare IP6s to assign to my public interface so I can't test much more. -- Damien Fleuriot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Major Domo wrote: Hi, Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem. I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't take the IP6 I give it. Uname: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc" jls -v: JID Hostname Path Name State CPUSetID IP Address(es) 23 [snip] /var/jail/ns ALIVE 2 192.168.0.252 fe80::c0a8:fc ifconfig lo252 from the host: lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x inet6 fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x5 ifconfig from the jail: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389b ether 00:e0:f4:19:e9:d2 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33204 lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x This is a rather special case. For link-local addresses you have to give the scope as well but it won't take the scope with the %lo252 notation but only in the KAME in-kernel syntax I would assume. Can you try: jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80:5::c0a8:fc" Note the added 5 in the second group of hex digits. That five is the interface index. I took it from the "scopeid 0x5". In case your interface index changes you will need to adjust the address. I cannot say if it'll work but it would be worth a try. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Major Domo wrote: > Hello list, > > > Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web > and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem. > > I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't > take the IP6 I give it. > > > Uname: > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE > > > Sysctl jail MIBs: > security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 > security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 > security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 0 > > > /etc/rc.conf settings: > jail_enable="YES" > jail_set_hostname_allow="NO" > jail_list="ns" > jail_ns_interface="lo252" > jail_ns_hostname="[snip]" > jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc" > jail_ns_rootdir="/var/jail/ns" > jail_ns_devfs_enable="YES" > > > jls -v: >JID Hostname Path > Name State > CPUSetID > IP Address(es) > 23 [snip] /var/jail/ns > ALIVE > 2 > 192.168.0.252 > fe80::c0a8:fc > > > ifconfig lo252 from the host: > lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x > inet6 fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x5 > > > ifconfig from the jail: > re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=389b > ether 00:e0:f4:19:e9:d2 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33204 > lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x > > > ping6 from the host: > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 --> fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 > 16 bytes from fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.082 ms > > > I fail to see what could be going wrong :( > > Any pointers please ? I have not used jails with link-local addresses, only global addresses and that works. It looks like you did not specify the whole link-local address in the jail_*_ip line. You need to add the %interface for a proper ipv6 link-local address, eg. fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252. Not everything works with link-local addresses though and jail might be one of them. John -- John Hay -- j...@meraka.csir.co.za / j...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a
From: Richard Mahlerwein Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a To: "FreeBSD-Stable" Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 2:58 PM > From: Gavin Atkinson > Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a > To: "Richard Mahlerwein" > Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" > Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 3:47 PM > On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Richard > Mahlerwein wrote: > >> I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine >> until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make >> installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near the >> end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, apparently >> triggered by devd. >> >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode. >> cpu id = 0; apic id = 00 >> fault virtual address = 0x3030313a >> fault code = supervisor write, page not present >> [snip] >> current process = 355 (devd) >> >> Does anyone have a further recommendation on what to do, >> try, test or change? > > Firstly, please set up a dump partition by adding > 'dumpdev="AUTO"' to your rc.conf. > > Then, can you compile in the kernel debugger (options KGB / > options DDB) and when this happens again, please obtain a > backtrace from the debugger with the "bt" command. > Then, give the "show registers" command so that we can > establish which register is pointing to the odd address. > Finally, issue the "call" command to hopefully > save a copy of the kernel dump for later analysis. > > Thanks, > > Gavin TWO Pieces of information here, and please excuse the repost - darn mailer's making me look like such a noob (not like I need help at that!). Again, mention it if this screws up the formatting too badly. Now that I know certain stuff doesn't come across, I have not used it so hopefully this will turn out nicely. Error at virtual address 0x3030313a current process 352(sysctl) bt says (typing blind, but I think I got it): Tracing pid 352 tid 100044 td 0xc3378480 sysctl_devctl_disable(c0c80ac0,0,0,d82fcba4,d82fcba4...) at sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa sysctl_root(d82fcba4,4,1,d82fcc60,0,...) at sysctl_root+0x187 userland_sysctl(c3378480,d82fcc14,3,0,0,...) at userland_sysctl+0x1c4 __sysctl(c3378480,d82fccfc,18,d82fcd38,d82fcd2c,...) at __sysctl_0x94 syscall(d82fcd38) at syscall_0x335 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall_0x20 --- syscall (202,FreeBSD ELF32, __sysctl, eip = 0x2815beaf, esp=0xbfbfe55c, epb = 0xbfbfe588 --- show registers : cs 0x20 ds 0xc1470028 es 0xc1470028 fs 0xc1460008 ss 0x28 eax 0xc0cea0cc devsoftc_0x4c ecx 0 edx 0x30303132 ebx 0xc3181350 esp 0xd82fcb34 ebp 0xd82fcb54 esi 0 edi 0 eip 0xc08218da sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa efl 0x10202 sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa: movl %eax,0x8(%edx) I hope that tells someone on the list way more than it tells me. On a hunch, I changed devd_enable="NO" to devd_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and get THIS error (which is back to being almost the same as the original one I got on the first attempt at a new kernel) vault virtual address 0x3030313a fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc08216dc stack pointer = 0x28: 0xd8311b70 frame pointer = 0x28:0xd8300b8c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process -= 255 (devd) [thread pid 355 tid 100045 ] stopped at devread+0x12c: movl %eax,0x8(%edx) bt says: Tracing pid 355 tid 100045 tc 0xc3378240 devread(c30df400,d8300c60,0,c3434564,d8300bd8,...) at devread+0x12c giant_read(c30df400,d8300c60,0,0,400,...) at giant_read+0x89 devfs_read_f(c33adb48,d8300c60,c3071300,0,c33adb48,...) at dofileread+0x96 kern_readv(c3378240,3,d8300c60,bfbfe9f7,400,...) at kern_readv+0x58 read(c3378240,d8300cfc,c,8000,369e99,...) at read+0x4f syscall(d8300d38) at syscall_0x335 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall_0x20 --- syscall (3, FreeBSD ELF32, read), eip - 0x8086c7f, esp = 0xbfbfe9bc, ebp = 0xbfbfee98 --- And show registers: cs=20, ds=d8300028, es=d8300028, fs= d838, ss=28, eax=c0cea0cc devsoftc_0x4c ecx=0x4, edx=0x30303132, ebx=oxc3181350, esp=pxd8300b70, ebp=oxd8300b8c, esi=0xc30df400, edi=0x6, eip=oxc08216dc devread_0x12c, efl=0x10202 devread+0x12c: movl %eax, 0x8(%edx) I'm still not quite sure what that's telling me, but is it significant that it's the same virtual location with a different piece of code loaded there because of a change in options? No other change was made, just changing devd_enable. I'm going to check loader.conf, too, as someone else suggested (but at this point, I didn't want to muddy the waters by changing two things at once). Thanks again, Rich ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > Hi, > > Is is a bad ida to create a zfs pool from a gmirrored slice? > zpool create tank /dev/mirror/gm0s1g works fine, but after the reboot > the filesystem failes consistency check. It *should* work. What error(s) do you get? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
Hello list, Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem. I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't take the IP6 I give it. Uname: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE Sysctl jail MIBs: security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 0 /etc/rc.conf settings: jail_enable="YES" jail_set_hostname_allow="NO" jail_list="ns" jail_ns_interface="lo252" jail_ns_hostname="[snip]" jail_ns_ip="192.168.0.252,fe80::c0a8:fc" jail_ns_rootdir="/var/jail/ns" jail_ns_devfs_enable="YES" jls -v: JID Hostname Path Name State CPUSetID IP Address(es) 23 [snip] /var/jail/ns ALIVE 2 192.168.0.252 fe80::c0a8:fc ifconfig lo252 from the host: lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x inet6 fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x5 ifconfig from the jail: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389b ether 00:e0:f4:19:e9:d2 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33204 lo252: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet 192.168.0.252 netmask 0x ping6 from the host: PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 --> fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252 16 bytes from fe80::c0a8:fc%lo252, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.082 ms I fail to see what could be going wrong :( Any pointers please ? Regards ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a
From: Richard Mahlerwein Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a To: "FreeBSD-Stable" Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 2:58 PM > From: Gavin Atkinson > Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a > To: "Richard Mahlerwein" > Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" > Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 3:47 PM > On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Richard > Mahlerwein wrote: > >> I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine >> until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make >> installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near the >> end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, apparently >> triggered by devd. >> >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode. >> cpu id = 0; apic id = 00 >> fault virtual address = 0x3030313a >> fault code = supervisor write, page not present >> [snip] >> current process = 355 (devd) >> >> Does anyone have a further recommendation on what to do, >> try, test or change? > > Firstly, please set up a dump partition by adding > 'dumpdev="AUTO"' to your rc.conf. > > Then, can you compile in the kernel debugger (options KGB / > options DDB) and when this happens again, please obtain a > backtrace from the debugger with the "bt" command. > Then, give the "show registers" command so that we can > establish which register is pointing to the odd address. > Finally, issue the "call" command to hopefully > save a copy of the kernel dump for later analysis. > > Thanks, > > Gavin Error at virtual address 0x3030313a current process 352(sysctl) bt says (typing blind, but I think I got it): Tracing pid 352 tid 100044 td 0xc3378480 sysctl_devctl_disable(c0c80ac0,0,0,d82fcba4,d82fcba4...) at sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa sysctl_root(d82fcba4,4,1,d82fcc60,0,...) at sysctl_root+0x187 userland_sysctl(c3378480,d82fcc14,3,0,0,...) at userland_sysctl+0x1c4 __sysctl(c3378480,d82fccfc,18,d82fcd38,d82fcd2c,...) at __sysctl_0x94 syscall(d82fcd38) at syscall_0x335 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall_0x20 --- syscall (202,FreeBSD ELF32, __sysctl, eip = 0x2815beaf, esp=0xbfbfe55c, epb = 0xbfbfe588 --- show registers : cs 0x20 ds 0xc1470028 es 0xc1470028 fs 0xc1460008 ss 0x28 eax 0xc0cea0cc devsoftc_0x4c ecx 0 edx 0x30303132 ebx 0xc3181350 esp 0xd82fcb34 ebp 0xd82fcb54 esi 0 edi 0 eip 0xc08218da sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa efl 0x10202 sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa: movl %eax,0x8(%edx) I hope that tells someone on the list way more than it tells me. Thanks again for all the help so far! -Rich I hope changing back to non-text (to get around some messed-up-ed-ness I've been having in my Yahoo account) won't mess this up too bad. Please don't yell at me if it does - just a polite mention will do. :) I changed devd_enable="NO" to devd_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and get THIS error (which is back to being almost the same as the original one I got on the first attempt at a new kernel) vault virtual address 0x3030313a fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc08216dc stack pointer = 0x28: 0xd8311b70 frame pointer = 0x28:0xd8300b8c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b =DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process -= 255 (devd) [thread pid 355 tid 100045 ] stopped at devread+0x12c: movl %eax,0x8(%edx) bt says: Tracing pid 355 tid 100045 tc 0xc3378240 devread(c30df400,d8300c60,0,c3434564,d8300bd8,...) at devread+0x12c giant_read(c30df400,d8300c60,0,0,400,...) at giant_read+0x89 devfs_read_f(c33adb48,d8300c60,c3071300,0,c33adb48,...) at dofileread+0x96 kern_readv(c3378240,3,d8300c60,bfbfe9f7,400,...) at kern_readv+0x58 read(c3378240,d8300cfc,c,8000,369e99,...) at read+0x4f syscall(d8300d38) at syscall_0x335 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall_0x20 --- syscall (3, FreeBSD ELF32, read), eip - 0x8086c7f, esp = 0xbfbfe9bc, ebp = 0xbfbfee98 --- And show registers: cs=20,ds=d8300028, es=d8300028,fs= d838, ss=28, eax=c0cea0cc devsoftc_0x4c ecx=0x4,, edx=0x30303132, ebx=oxc3181350, esp=pxd8300b70, ebp=oxd8300b8c, esi=0xc30df400, edi=0x6, eip=oxc08216dc devread_0x12c, efl=0x10202 devread+0x12c: movl %eax, 0x8(%edx) I'm still not quite sure what that's telling me, but is it significant that it's the same virtual location with a different piece of code loaded there because of a change in options? No other change was made, just changing devd_enable. I'm going to check loader.conf, too, as someone else suggested (but at this point, I didn't want to muddy the waters by changing two things at once). ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a
> From: Gavin Atkinson > Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a > To: "Richard Mahlerwein" > Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" > Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 3:47 PM > On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Richard > Mahlerwein wrote: > >> I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine >> until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make >> installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near the >> end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, apparently >> triggered by devd. >> >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode. >> cpu id = 0; apic id = 00 >> fault virtual address = 0x3030313a >> fault code = supervisor write, page not present >> [snip] >> current process = 355 (devd) >> >> Does anyone have a further recommendation on what to do, >> try, test or change? > > Firstly, please set up a dump partition by adding > 'dumpdev="AUTO"' to your rc.conf. > > Then, can you compile in the kernel debugger (options KGB / > options DDB) and when this happens again, please obtain a > backtrace from the debugger with the "bt" command. > Then, give the "show registers" command so that we can > establish which register is pointing to the odd address. > Finally, issue the "call" command to hopefully > save a copy of the kernel dump for later analysis. > > Thanks, > > Gavin Error at virtual address 0x3030313a current process 352(sysctl) bt says (typing blind, but I think I got it): Tracing pid 352 tid 100044 td 0xc3378480 sysctl_devctl_disable(c0c80ac0,0,0,d82fcba4,d82fcba4...) at sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa sysctl_root(d82fcba4,4,1,d82fcc60,0,...) at sysctl_root+0x187 userland_sysctl(c3378480,d82fcc14,3,0,0,...) at userland_sysctl+0x1c4 __sysctl(c3378480,d82fccfc,18,d82fcd38,d82fcd2c,...) at __sysctl_0x94 syscall(d82fcd38) at syscall_0x335 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall_0x20 --- syscall (202,FreeBSD ELF32, __sysctl, eip = 0x2815beaf, esp=0xbfbfe55c, epb = 0xbfbfe588 --- show registers : cs 0x20 ds 0xc1470028 es 0xc1470028 fs 0xc1460008 ss 0x28 eax 0xc0cea0cc devsoftc_0x4c ecx 0 edx 0x30303132 ebx 0xc3181350 esp 0xd82fcb34 ebp 0xd82fcb54 esi 0 edi 0 eip 0xc08218da sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa efl 0x10202 sysctl_devctl_disable+0xaa: movl %eax,0x8(%edx) I hope that tells someone on the list way more than it tells me. Thanks again for all the help so far! -Rich ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: Hi, Is is a bad ida to create a zfs pool from a gmirrored slice? zpool create tank /dev/mirror/gm0s1g works fine, but after the reboot the filesystem failes consistency check. Regards, mjb I'm not familiar with gmirror, but it'd be a way better idea to mirror it using ZFS if possible - that way you get self-healing and stuff like that, which you won't if ZFS doesn't have a mirror/RAIDZ setup, but only sees a single slice. Regards, Thomas ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: 2009/9/1 Thomas Backman : On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: I'm not familiar with gmirror, but it'd be a way better idea to mirror it using ZFS if possible - that way you get self-healing and stuff like that, which you won't if ZFS doesn't have a mirror/RAIDZ setup, but only sees a single slice. I would like to do so. I have to disks (ad4 and ad5). Is it possible to create two slices on both disks (eg ad4s1 and ad4s2 for ad4). Then to create gmirror on ad4s1, install freebsd on it so it would boot from it. Then, after having my system running to create zfs mirror from ad4s2 and ad5s2? Why not go ZFS all the way? ZFS on root is well supported these days (well, not by sysinstall, but it works great if you do it manually) - you don't even need UFS /boot anymore. Again, not familiar with gmirror, but my guess (that will be corrected or confirmed by someone ;) is that your way would work too. Regards, Thomas ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
GCC -m32 option on FreeBSD/AMD64 7.2
Hi,
is C++ + GCC -m32 option officially supported by FreeBSD/AMD64 7.2? I am
getting the following errors for simplest input:
shell::wilx:~/tmp> cat >m32.cxx
#include
shell::wilx:~/tmp> g++ -c m32.cxx
shell::wilx:~/tmp> g++ -m32 m32.cxx
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ext/new_allocator.h:37,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++allocator.h:39,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/allocator.h:53,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:54,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/string:48,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/locale_classes.h:47,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/ios_base.h:47,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ios:48,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ostream:45,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/iostream:45,
from m32.cxx:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:95: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:96: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:99: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:100: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:105: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
/usr/include/c++/4.2/new:106: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t'
('unsigned int') as first parameter
--
VH
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: 2009/9/1 Thomas Backman : On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: I'm not familiar with gmirror, but it'd be a way better idea to mirror it using ZFS if possible - that way you get self-healing and stuff like that, which you won't if ZFS doesn't have a mirror/RAIDZ setup, but only sees a single slice. I would like to do so. I have to disks (ad4 and ad5). Is it possible to create two slices on both disks (eg ad4s1 and ad4s2 for ad4). Then to create gmirror on ad4s1, install freebsd on it so it would boot from it. Then, after having my system running to create zfs mirror from ad4s2 and ad5s2? Yes, I am using it this way: r...@cage ~/# gmirror status NameStatus Components mirror/gms1 COMPLETE ad4s1 ad6s1 r...@cage ~/# zpool status pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM tankONLINE 0 0 0 mirrorONLINE 0 0 0 ad4s2 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad6s2 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors r...@cage ~/# zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT tank444G353G 91.2G79% ONLINE - gmirror gms1 is for system files, ports etc. zpool (444GB) is for jails Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > 2009/9/1 Thomas Backman : > > On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > > I'm not familiar with gmirror, but it'd be a way better idea to mirror it > > using ZFS if possible - that way you get self-healing and stuff like > that, > > which you won't if ZFS doesn't have a mirror/RAIDZ setup, but only sees a > > single slice. > > I would like to do so. I have to disks (ad4 and ad5). Is it possible > to create two slices on both disks (eg ad4s1 and ad4s2 for ad4). > Then to create gmirror on ad4s1, install freebsd on it so it would > boot from it. Then, after having my system running to create zfs > mirror from ad4s2 and ad5s2? > > Yes, this is definitely doable. You can use entire drives (ad4), single slices (ad4s1), or individual partitions (ad4s1d) with ZFS. Create two slices; install to and use s1 on both drives for the gmirror RAID1; and use s2 on both drives for a ZFS RAID1. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
2009/9/1 Thomas Backman : > On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > > > I'm not familiar with gmirror, but it'd be a way better idea to mirror it > using ZFS if possible - that way you get self-healing and stuff like that, > which you won't if ZFS doesn't have a mirror/RAIDZ setup, but only sees a > single slice. > I would like to do so. I have to disks (ad4 and ad5). Is it possible to create two slices on both disks (eg ad4s1 and ad4s2 for ad4). Then to create gmirror on ad4s1, install freebsd on it so it would boot from it. Then, after having my system running to create zfs mirror from ad4s2 and ad5s2? mjb -- [ -< Maciej Jan Broniarz || gau...@gausus.net >-- ] | Siamo qui \ sotto la stessa luce \ sotto la sua croce \ | | cantando ad una voce \ E l'Emmanuel Emmanuel, Emmanuel, | [ ---< E l'Emmanuel, Emmanuel >-- ] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > From: Gavin Atkinson > Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a > To: "Richard Mahlerwein" > Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" > Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 3:47 PM > On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Richard > Mahlerwein wrote: > > > (Sorry, update to subject to be ) > > > > 3 weeks ago: > > I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed > fine > > until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing > make > > installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near > the > > end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, > apparently > > triggered by devd. > > > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode. > > cpu id = 0; apic id = 00 > > fault virtual address = 0x3030313a > > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > > [snip] > > current process = 355 (devd) > > > > > > [snip] > > Does anyone have a further recommendation on what to > do, > > try, test or change? > > Firstly, please set up a dump partition by adding > 'dumpdev="AUTO"' to your rc.conf. > > Then, can you compile in the kernel debugger (options KGB / > options DDB) and when this happens again, please obtain a > backtrace from the debugger with the "bt" command. > Then, give the "show registers" command so that we can > establish which register is pointing to the odd address. > Finally, issue the "call doadump()" command to hopefully > save a copy of the kernel dump for later analysis. > > Thanks, > > Gavin No problem, but for future reference by others reading this thread, the handbook says KGB should be KDB, which is what I'm enabling in the kernel config. DDB is fine. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-online-ddb.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
> ZFS includes support for RAID0 (stripe), RAID1 (mirroring), RAID5 and RAID6 > (raidz1/raidz2), and (soon in OpenSolaris) RAID7 (raidz3). Why would you > want to build a pool out of devices that are already RAID'd together? Because gmirror type RAIDing is more appropriate for your application than ZFS RAID ? I am not the original poster, but I can easily see why one would want to do do this. For example making a gmirror of a local drive and a remote drive - you can ask gmirror to prefer reads on the local disc, but there isn't a way to specify that in ZFS that I know of. Also gmirror on top of ggate behaves nicely if the remote drive fails. ZFS does not behave nicely at all - or it didn't when I ran tests. I havent tried on the latest version I admit. But ZFS as a filesystem still has many significant advantages, so runnng it on top of gmirror is actually a worthwhile thing to do. -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zfs on gmirror slice
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > Is is a bad ida to create a zfs pool from a gmirrored slice? > zpool create tank /dev/mirror/gm0s1g works fine, but after the reboot > the filesystem failes consistency check. > > You could, but the question is ... why would you? ZFS includes support for RAID0 (stripe), RAID1 (mirroring), RAID5 and RAID6 (raidz1/raidz2), and (soon in OpenSolaris) RAID7 (raidz3). Why would you want to build a pool out of devices that are already RAID'd together? Just use the bare disks, or slices on disks, or partitions even. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
zfs on gmirror slice
Hi, Is is a bad ida to create a zfs pool from a gmirrored slice? zpool create tank /dev/mirror/gm0s1g works fine, but after the reboot the filesystem failes consistency check. Regards, mjb -- [ -< Maciej Jan Broniarz || gau...@gausus.net >-- ] | Siamo qui \ sotto la stessa luce \ sotto la sua croce \ | | cantando ad una voce \ E l'Emmanuel Emmanuel, Emmanuel, | [ ---< E l'Emmanuel, Emmanuel >-- ] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
