Re: Many core dumps in pthread_getspecific.
Kudos to Konstantin Belousov! I'm not sure if this list was interested into all this error tracking. So we made the error tracking with private mails. Anyway, it was a BIOS setting named limit CPUID maximum and I had to disable it (BIOS help said disabled for Windows XP). Thank you Konstantin Belousov, you have an amazing skill in this low level debugging stuff. :) Sincerely yours Andre. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? Based on what I've recently learned of the machine's history, it was originally freefall, then became known as 'hub'. You have any idea what is/was actual the hardware that was in the box? If I remember correctly we gave Jordan a check for like 5000 guilders. Which I guess would be 2500 us$ at that time. Which was not an enormous amount of money, so even more impressive that the system lasted 18 years :) --WjW ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On 27/07/2015 16:42, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:32:34PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? Based on what I've recently learned of the machine's history, it was originally freefall, then became known as 'hub'. You have any idea what is/was actual the hardware that was in the box? If I remember correctly we gave Jordan a check for like 5000 guilders. Which I guess would be 2500 us$ at that time. Which was not an enormous amount of money, so even more impressive that the system lasted 18 years :) The physical hardware did not last this long, and I do not recall the physical specs of the recently deprecated hardware, but as far as handling this task for 18 years, that could have been clarified a bit more (my fault). The system moved chassis several times, but was never reinstalled (as far as we can tell) - it was originally a FreeBSD 2-STABLE install, and was upgraded constantly throughout its lifetime, and finally ran 11-CURRENT before being decommissioned. Right, that makes more sense. And I'm sort of more relaxed that there is not that much commodity hardware capable to survive that long running 24*7 ... The oldest servers here in the basement are like 10 years old, and on the brink of being thrashed... --WjW ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? Based on what I've recently learned of the machine's history, it was originally freefall, then became known as 'hub'. Glen pgp8JmB2ypwi2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:32:34PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? Based on what I've recently learned of the machine's history, it was originally freefall, then became known as 'hub'. You have any idea what is/was actual the hardware that was in the box? If I remember correctly we gave Jordan a check for like 5000 guilders. Which I guess would be 2500 us$ at that time. Which was not an enormous amount of money, so even more impressive that the system lasted 18 years :) The physical hardware did not last this long, and I do not recall the physical specs of the recently deprecated hardware, but as far as handling this task for 18 years, that could have been clarified a bit more (my fault). The system moved chassis several times, but was never reinstalled (as far as we can tell) - it was originally a FreeBSD 2-STABLE install, and was upgraded constantly throughout its lifetime, and finally ran 11-CURRENT before being decommissioned. Glen pgp8vBlm1_ZNd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? --WjW ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: MFC r282973 (disable libgomp build) and r283060 (disable libgcov build)?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:40:32 + Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote: I'm not fond of lang/gcc as openmp provider: if a port use c++, it will cause linkage headaches with libc++ (I never was able to have graphics/darktable working, for example). You might want to try out lang/clang-devel with devel/libiomp5-devel. See this thread on freebsd-ports@ http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55AE0474.5050207. Just a heads up in case you try this next week, devel/libiomp5-devel is about to be deleted and the openmp library (as well as clang-devel) will be installed by the llvm-devel port. The clang-devel port will become a metaport to aid people in finding clang while we wait for multiple packages-per-port support. -- Brooks Thanks, and nicely done, I just tested it this morning, this may come in handy! -- Matthieu Volat ma...@alkumuna.eu pgpohWs7jVfyc.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
10.2-RC1/STABLE VIMAGE memory leak progress?
I'm running 10-STABLE (which currently identifies itself as 10.2-PRERELEASE) and lately I've started experimenting with using iocage for Jail management. (I really like it so far.) In particular, I've been trying out iocage's support for VNET networking that relies on VIMAGE and uses bridge and epair for the network. I find that when I stop a VNET Jail using iocage that I get something akin to the following in my console logs: = Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: vnet0:1: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: vnet0: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: re0: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: bridge0: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: vnet1:1: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: vnet1: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: bridge1: link state changed to DOWN Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed: 48 Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: Freed UMA keg (udp_inpcb) was not empty (120 items). Lost 12 pages of memory. Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: Freed UMA keg (udpcb) was not empty (1169 items). Lost 7 pages of memory. Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: hhook_vnet_uninit: hhook_head type=1, id=1 cleanup required Jul 27 10:59:47 chumby kernel: hhook_vnet_uninit: hhook_head type=1, id=0 cleanup required = I found a PR (kern/164763) dating back to 2012-02-04 describing the problem. The last update on that PR was on 2014-10-17, which made reference to some unmerged fixes that would be good to merge into HEAD. Does anyone know whether this was done? One of the entries in that PR states, Our current rule of thumb is 'if you need to shutdown one vimage jail then you need to reboot the host.' It then goes on to observe, Of course this is far from optimal. Is it safe to say, then, that dynamic VNET Jails are not recommended still under FreeBSD? Judging by that PR, this is not likely to be fixed for 10.2-RELEASE? Cheers, Paul. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2015
On 7/27/15 10:32 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to new, single-purpose service installations Hi, This sort of sounds like the system that a former company (IAE) donated to Jordan when he was here in Arnhem at a FreeBSD meeting organized by Wilco Bulte. I think it was called freefall?? There used to be pictures of the meeting online, but I can't seem to find them. Would be nice to know if that is the case, because then I'm really impressed with the life time of that system... Does anybody know if this is actually the case? Based on what I've recently learned of the machine's history, it was originally freefall, then became known as 'hub'. You have any idea what is/was actual the hardware that was in the box? If I remember correctly we gave Jordan a check for like 5000 guilders. Which I guess would be 2500 us$ at that time. Which was not an enormous amount of money, so even more impressive that the system lasted 18 years :) I think it was a bit like my grandfather's axe.. A really great axe. we replaced the handle 3 times, the head four times and put in a couple of new wedges, but it's a great axe that one! --WjW ___ freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Many core dumps in pthread_getspecific.
hi! What was that option actually doing? How'd it break things? -adrian On 27 July 2015 at 05:02, Andre Meiser orta...@web.de wrote: Kudos to Konstantin Belousov! I'm not sure if this list was interested into all this error tracking. So we made the error tracking with private mails. Anyway, it was a BIOS setting named limit CPUID maximum and I had to disable it (BIOS help said disabled for Windows XP). Thank you Konstantin Belousov, you have an amazing skill in this low level debugging stuff. :) Sincerely yours Andre. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
