Re: Minor 11.1 -> 11.2 upgrade glitch

2018-10-01 Thread Alan Somers
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:08 AM Marc Branchaud  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a ZFS dataset mounted under /usr/local/jenkins.  I've made this
> the home directory of my jenkins user, so that directory has to be owned
> by jenkins.
>
> # cd /usr/local
> # ls -ld jenkins
> drwxr-xr-x  20 jenkins  jenkins  75 Sep 17 10:48 jenkins
>
> After upgrading from 11.1 to 11.2, the directory ended up owned by root:
>
> drwxr-xr-x  20 root  jenkins  75 Sep 17 10:48 jenkins
>
> Only the directory ownership changed -- all the contents were still
> owned by jenkins.
>
> Not a big deal, but I did have a moment of dread when jenkins failed to
> start after the upgrade.
>
> So is this a bug, or is there some policy that everything immediately
> under /usr/local should be owned by root?
>
> M.
>

You probably did a "pkg upgrade" after upgrading your base system, and
that's probably what changed the directory's permission.  Upgrading the
base system shouldn't have an effect.  I would ask the Jenkins port
maintainer your question.
-Alan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: traceroute -n difference between STABLE-11 and CURRENT

2018-10-01 Thread Mariusz Zaborski
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On systems with STABLE-11 @ r338696, I found that
> 
> traceroute -n ...
> 
> led to:
> 
> traceroute: cap_enter: Function not implemented
> 
> I rebuilt the systems with
> 
> WITHOUT_CASPER
> 
> commented in /etc/src.conf
> 
> and (to be safe ?)
> 
> CAPABILITY_MODE
> CAPABILITIES
> 
> uncommented in the kernel definitions
> 
> And traceroute -n can now be successfully used.
> 
> Being curious, I traced this behaviour to r338475 by oshogbo, which is 
> documented as a MFC of r314000
> 
> BUT i NEVER met this problem on my CURRENT systems which are now at 
> r338331 (so after r314000), and are built WITHOUT_CASPER and without 
> CAPABILITY_MODE nor CAPABILITIES in their kernel definitions.
> 
> What am I missing (my only hint being the change from HAVE_LIBCASPER to 
> WITH_CASPER) ?
> 
> CBu

Hello,

sorry for keep you waiting. Your issue should be fixed with the r339045 in
STABLE-11.

Thanks,
-- 
Mariusz Zaborski
oshogbo//vx | http://oshogbo.vexillium.org
FreeBSD committer   | https://freebsd.org
Software developer  | http://wheelsystems.com
If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is!!1



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature