gcc segfaults on RELENG_5_3 buildworld

2005-01-09 Thread Aron Stansvik
I'm going to test my RAM with memtest86, but I just wanted to check;
is anyone else seeing this? I'm using /usr/src as of a couple of hours
ago. The segfault occurs when linking 'genconfig'. This is the first
buildworld on a completely fresh 5.3-RELEASE install.

Best regards,
Aron Stansvik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gcc segfaults on RELENG_5_3 buildworld

2005-01-09 Thread Aron Stansvik
Ok, bad RAM. Sorry for posting uneccessarily.

Aron

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:28:25 +0100, Aron Stansvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm going to test my RAM with memtest86, but I just wanted to check;
 is anyone else seeing this? I'm using /usr/src as of a couple of hours
 ago. The segfault occurs when linking 'genconfig'. This is the first
 buildworld on a completely fresh 5.3-RELEASE install.
 
 Best regards,
 Aron Stansvik

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Booting 5.3R on second disk using NTLDR

2005-01-08 Thread Aron Stansvik
Hello.

I've been struggling with a dual boot setup for the best part of two
days here, and I'm not going to go outline the hazzles I've been
through. This is where I am now:

ad0 = Windows XP Professional
ad1 = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE

Both OSs were installed from scratch, and ad0 and ad1 are set to
master and slave respectively. No cable select. I did the installation
in this order:

1) Make sure ad0 is the only connected disk.
2) Install Windows XP Professional on it.
3) Make sure ad1 is the only connected disk.
3) Install a Standard FreeBSD installation.

This because I'm in a paranoid state by now, so I want to make sure
Windows don't mess the FreeBSD disk up (and vice versa by user error).

During FreeBSD installation, I choose Install a standard MBR (no boot
manager), I then booted the system with the kernel from the CD and
the root from my new install, by doing boot -a and then specify
ufs:ad1s1a as my root. When 5.3 was booted, I then did:

1) dd if=/dev/ad1s1 of=/tmp/bootsect.bsd bs=512 count=1
2) scp /tmp/bootsect.bsd other_host:/tmp
3) Halt the system
4) Connect ad0
5) Boot Windows XP
6) scp other_host:/tmp/bootsect.bsd c:\
7) Append this to c:\boot.ini:
   c:\bootsect.bsd = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
8) Reboot and choose FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE at the NTLDR boot menu
9) Boot error

Anyone know what I've done wrong? I've followed the short instructions at:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER

and I've Googled and read both boot(8) and boot0cfg(8) to look for
something that I've done wrong or something that could help me get
this to work.

It was a long time since I set up a dual boot, but I need it this way
because it's my parents new computer, and me and my brother want
something else but Windows when we're there. I remember setting up
NTLDR to boot Linux years ago, but then it was on the same disk.

Thanks a lot for any answers!

Best regards,
Aron Stansvik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Booting 5.3R on second disk using NTLDR (Impossible?)

2005-01-08 Thread Aron Stansvik
I did some in the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd news group, and I found some
people with the same problem. I'm suspecting that it is impossible to
boot FreeBSD by using NTLDR to load the FreeBSD boot sector from a
file when FreeBSD is placed on a second disk.

Can anyone confirm that this is the case? (the news group postings
were very old). And why is it so?

Thanks for any answers.

Aron

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:56:09 +0100, Aron Stansvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello.
 
 I've been struggling with a dual boot setup for the best part of two
 days here, and I'm not going to go outline the hazzles I've been
 through. This is where I am now:
 
 ad0 = Windows XP Professional
 ad1 = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
 
 Both OSs were installed from scratch, and ad0 and ad1 are set to
 master and slave respectively. No cable select. I did the installation
 in this order:
 
 1) Make sure ad0 is the only connected disk.
 2) Install Windows XP Professional on it.
 3) Make sure ad1 is the only connected disk.
 3) Install a Standard FreeBSD installation.
 
 This because I'm in a paranoid state by now, so I want to make sure
 Windows don't mess the FreeBSD disk up (and vice versa by user error).
 
 During FreeBSD installation, I choose Install a standard MBR (no boot
 manager), I then booted the system with the kernel from the CD and
 the root from my new install, by doing boot -a and then specify
 ufs:ad1s1a as my root. When 5.3 was booted, I then did:
 
 1) dd if=/dev/ad1s1 of=/tmp/bootsect.bsd bs=512 count=1
 2) scp /tmp/bootsect.bsd other_host:/tmp
 3) Halt the system
 4) Connect ad0
 5) Boot Windows XP
 6) scp other_host:/tmp/bootsect.bsd c:\
 7) Append this to c:\boot.ini:
c:\bootsect.bsd = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
 8) Reboot and choose FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE at the NTLDR boot menu
 9) Boot error
 
 Anyone know what I've done wrong? I've followed the short instructions at:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER
 
 and I've Googled and read both boot(8) and boot0cfg(8) to look for
 something that I've done wrong or something that could help me get
 this to work.
 
 It was a long time since I set up a dual boot, but I need it this way
 because it's my parents new computer, and me and my brother want
 something else but Windows when we're there. I remember setting up
 NTLDR to boot Linux years ago, but then it was on the same disk.
 
 Thanks a lot for any answers!
 
 Best regards,
 Aron Stansvik

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


List of unneeded files?

2004-11-10 Thread Aron Stansvik
Hello.

I just upgraded my 5.2.1-RELEASE laptop to 5.3-RELEASE, all went fine
but I have a question: Is there a list of the files installed by 5.2.1-RELEASE
that are not installed/needed by the 5.3-RELEASE? If there isn't, why not?

I've looked through the Release Notes and Migration Guide without finding
anything like this, I can't say it feels like a clean upgrade until
those files
are gone.

Best regards,
Aron Stansvik
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]