Re: ZFS MFC heads down
On 5/21/09 4:15 PM, Kip Macy wrote: Your snapshots are using two thirds of your used capacity. 'df' only knows about the mounted file system. Cheers, Kip On that subject, if anyone isn't aware this version of zfs has nicer space accounting. you should check out the output of zfs list -o space SUPER AWESOME HUH!? unfortunately the fancy new space accounting only works on datasets created on a pool supporting it, so all of us who upgraded our pools will not see any output. for example NAMEAVAIL USED USEDSNAP USEDDS USEDREFRESERV USEDCHILD rpool/ROOT/snv_107 8.86G 3.80G - - - - however you can just create a new dataset with zfs create to take advantage of the new space accounting. then you'll get real output like NAMEAVAIL USED USEDSNAP USEDDS USEDREFRESERV USEDCHILD phoenix/rsync/cifs 70.2G 272G 212G 59.3G 0 0 I can easily see here that I have 212G of snapshots for this dataset. I just thought I would throw that out there for anyone who didn't know about it yet. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: RFT: ZFS MFC
On 5/15/09 8:02 PM, Kip Macy wrote: I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/ The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this time. Thanks, Kip I created a pool on 7.1, created some datasets, populated them, made some snapshots. Upgraded to v13 deleted a few snapshots, created a clone, promoted a clone, deleted and created some new datasets. So far so good. I'll try to make something break! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS root File System
Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote: (note the fact that / can not be easily rolled back to previous state using ZFS's snapshot feature, and can not be easily switched between clones I actually keep a full minimal install on my UFS /bootdisk slice (which i use geom mirror for) and then symlink /bootdisk/boot to /boot on the ZFS /. This way should I ever need to rollback ZFS / I can quickly change the vfs.root.mountfrom to /dev/mirror/gm0 and then have a base system living entirely on UFS. If you do it that way you can easily rollback your ZFS / should you need to and then just reboot back to the ZFS / when you're done. Cheers, Dillon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: MFC ZFS: when?
I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote but I'm encountering this bug http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349 Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the clone becomes so large that my pool fills up :-) I should have a few months before that happens though. On 11/24/08 6:21 PM, Andrew Snow wrote: The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT relies on too many other new features that aren't in 7.1. After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it requires can be moved into 7-STABLE? - Andrew ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ZFS version 8 on stable?
There's nothing you can do right now except for wait. By default the zfs implementation on osx will create a zfs version 6 zpool (to retain compat with the read-only kext that ships with 10.5) but once you've upgraded you can't go back. There is a newer version of zfs for freebsd but it hasn't been commited yet. See http://kerneltrap.org/FreeBSD/BSDCan_2008_ZFS_Internals Your only option is to wait until this is committed or patches are offered at least. pjd is the man so it shouldn't be too long :-) Timothy Wilson wrote: Hello everyone, I know -stable is supposed to be, well, stable, but I seem to be in a bit of a pickle. I'm trying to import my zfs file system from a Macintosh machine. It was created at version 8. Being new to zfs, I did not realise that FreeBSD would be running at a lower version; I thought zfs was zfs! Of course, trying to import my zpool fails, complaining that the version is too new. freebsd# zpool import bigstore cannot import 'bigstore': pool is formatted using a newer ZFS version So either I want to downgrade the zpool, or upgrade zfs on FreeBSD. Does anyone know if I'll be able to import zfs v8, or am I wasting my time? I'd prefer to follow -stable, but if I must follow -current, then golly goshkins, I'll have no choice! Kind regards, Timothy. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
