Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:29:25PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> 
> This also interested me:
> 
> * Linux system crashed
>   http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2011-11/msg8.html
> 
> * OpenIndiana system crashed same way as Linux system
>   http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2011-11/msg00017.html
> 
> I cannot help but wonder if the Linux and OpenIndiana installations were
> more stressful on the hardware -- getting more out of the system, maybe
> resulting in increased power/load, which in turn resulted in the systems
> locking up (shoddy PSU, unstable mainboard, MCH problems, etc.).
> 
> My point is that Francois states these things in such a way to imply
> that "DragonflyBSD was more stable",

Same thing can be said for FreeBSD, only Linux and OpenIndiana crashed
reliably if I remember correctly.

> when in fact I happen to wonder the
> opposite point -- that is to say, Linux and OpenIndiana were trying to
> use the hardware more-so than DragonflyBSD, thus tickled what may be a
> hardware-level problem.

I actually ran the benchmarks on two different machines with the same
hardware -- brand new Supermicro boxes with ECC memory and no cut corners.

Since then, I've found I could stop the Linux crashes by disabling some
options in the BIOS setup:
  - advanced ACPI settings (don't remember exactly which ones)
  - and a new WHEA one.

WHEA means Windows Hardware Error Architecture. For all I know, it may have
been the only culprit but I didn't have time to verify if the machines
also ran fine with only this option disabled.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mps(4) driver (LSI 6Gb SAS) commited to stable/8

2011-02-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 02:38:32PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > 
> Please be aware of a performance issue affecting certain models of WD
> RE4 disks.  Specifics are still sketchy, but you should read the thread
> "immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance
> issues" in full to get an idea of the problem:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-January/thread.html#54185
> 
> There's confirmation of the problem here, with the statement that WD
> gave at least one person a firmware image that fixed the problem:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-January/054489.html

I'm not sure if this is exactly the same issue, but I also had to flash
some WD drives a few month ago.
There was a bad firmware version on some 2TB RE4-GP models; disks kept
getting removed from RAID volumes due to write timeouts.

> Buyer beware.  :-)  And remember, it's not an issue with the
> brand/vendor, just certain models.

Disks these days are no longer just disks, but complete computers with
ram, many processors, and the associated software issues...

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: LSI SAS 2008 (mfi) on SuperMicro X8SI6-F

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:23:26PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> 
> DK> PS: My experiments were with the X8DTL-6F motherboard and Supermicro 
> chassis
> DK> with E16 expander. There is no reason the HBA chip in the single processor
> DK> motherboard to be different.
> 
> My box is actually the same (846E1)

Not exactly: with Supermicro, E1 means a SAS 3 Gb/s backplane and E16 is
for SAS 6Gb/s

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: PXE boot FreeBSD without need of NFS server

2009-05-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Pertti, András,
> Thank You for the useful links!
> Kiitos and Köszönöm szépen :-)
> 
> Gót András wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > AFAIK only the kernel and initrd (in the linux case) can be booted from
> > tftp, that's a PXE feature. When the kernel loaded it takes over and from
> > then on the kernel will need a rootfs from somewhere. I don't think that a
> > tftp rootfs is possible.
> > 
> 
> Yes, I know it's not possible to have the rootfs on tftp. That is not my
>  goal. I only wish to host an image file containing a rootfs that will
> act as a ram disk. Much like the initrd does in the Linux world. The
> rootfs will only contain the things needed to start the installation
> process.

Have a look at ThinBSD. It a mini FreeBSD-5.x system which uses a ramdisk
image as root. It can be booted from a TFTP server, without NFS.

The web site is here: http://thinbsd.zefyris.com/

I use it everyday to run a X terminal.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: buildworld failure in libexec.mail.local on 6.1 Release

2006-05-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:58:49PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
> l.s.
> 
> After running cvsup to RELENG_6_1, I started `make buildworld
> KERNCONF=BEASTIE61` as per the handbook's '21.4.1 The Canonical Way to
> Update Your System'
> 
> In libexec/mail.local I get the following on stderr
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libldap-2.2.so.7, needed by
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: liblber-2.2.so.7, needed by
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_get_dn'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_unbind'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_first_entry'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_simple_bind_s'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_set_option'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_memfree'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_init'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_search_ext_s'
> /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_msgfree'
> 
> >From stdout I had
> ===> libexec/mail.local (all)
> cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m
> -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I.
> -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL  -c
> /usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/mail.local/mail.local.c
> cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m
> -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I.
> -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL   -L/usr/local/lib -o mail.local
> mail.local.o /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../lib/libsm/libsm.a
> -lsasl
> *** Error code 1

I guess you're trying to use a sendmail compiled with SMTP AUTH support.
I have the same problem here.

Even though libldap-2.2.so.7 and liblber-2.2.so.7 are in /usr/local/lib
and cc has a -L/usr/local/lib flag, ld doesn't find them.

Even putting the libraries in /usr/lib doesn't correct this error.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Instant crash with FreeBSD 6.1-RC and 4GB RAM

2006-04-12 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 03:46:03AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> try to update BIOS ...

Already done. The machine remains unusable with 4GB.

I will try to use a Tyan Tomcat K8E. Hopefully this one will work as
advertised...

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Instant crash with FreeBSD 6.1-RC and 4GB RAM

2006-04-12 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:47:02PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:43:06PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > 
> > I just tried booting a FreeBSD-6.1-RC1/amd64 CD in a machine with an
> > Athlon-64 X2 4400+ and 4GB of memory.
> > 
> > The mainboard is an Asus A8V-E-SE.
> > 
> > The kernel displays its copyright and then crashes almost instantly. The
> > screen is filled with the letter 'k' and the machine reboots soon after
> > that.

[...]

> > If the memory is limited to 3GB in the BIOS, FreeBSD boots as expected.
> > 
> > I would appreciate if someone could share some insight about this problem.
> 
> Replace the broken 1GB memory stick? :-)

Well, with the same sticks, the same CD boots correctly in an
Opteron/Supermicro H8SSL-i machine

Silly me, I thought it could have been a software bug, when it was in
fact a hardware one...

Any recommandation for a known working socket 939 mainboard with PCI-E
graphics ?

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Instant crash with FreeBSD 6.1-RC and 4GB RAM

2006-04-12 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hello,

I just tried booting a FreeBSD-6.1-RC1/amd64 CD in a machine with an
Athlon-64 X2 4400+ and 4GB of memory.

The mainboard is an Asus A8V-E-SE.

The kernel displays its copyright and then crashes almost instantly. The
screen is filled with the letter 'k' and the machine reboots soon after
that.

Here is a copy of the verbose boot messages (transcripted by hand):

SMAP type=01 base= len=0009f400
SMAP type=02 base=000f len=0001
SMAP type=02 base=fec0 len=0140
SMAP type=02 base=e000 len=1000
SMAP type=03 base=afee3000 len=d000
SMAP type=04 base=afee len=3000
SMAP type=02 base=0009f400 len=0c00
SMAP type=02 base=afef len=0001
SMAP type=01 base=0010 len=afde
SMAP type=01 base=0001 len=5000
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 #0: Mon Apr 10 20:16:14 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

(crash here)

If the memory is limited to 3GB in the BIOS, FreeBSD boots as expected.

I would appreciate if someone could share some insight about this problem.

TIA,

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: watchdog network card

2006-03-27 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
> 
> I can't add another PCI card because all my PCI slot is in use.
> 
> On my server I need 5 network Interface, and I've 2 bi-dual-gigabits PCI
> card and one on mothercard. 

You still have the option to replace on of the dual ports NIC by a quad port
one.

http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000mt_quad_server_adapter.htm

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:56:34PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 06:38 PM 10/17/2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>  
> >Two of our scanners in the cluster are SMP boxes-- dual core AMD running in 
> >386 mode and an Intel D830.
> >Both work really well, and take quite a load against them network / cpu 
> >wise.  Lots of threads running. 
> >Also have FAST_IPSEC clients and a server running RELENG_6 from around Beta 
> >1.
> 
> How is AMD in AMD64 mode? One thing we're looking at doing is deploying some 
> single-core AMD64s.

Very stable since -BETA4 on a single core machine here (workstation and
X11 terminal server). It had crashes under load with previous -BETA.
Uptime went to 20+ days without trouble before I upgraded it to -RC1.

The hardware is a MSI board with VIA chipset.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: autologin only in one ttyv

2005-09-02 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +0200, Mathieu PREVOT wrote:
> 
> I would like to autologin in *only one* ttyv (eg ttyv1) and then launch 
> X with xinit manually or with a script.
> I used ":al=:" in /etc/gettytab and added or not xinit in 
> /etc/, but it's not very satisfying!
> Hence, I would like this to occur only for ttyv1. Can someone help me?

I have done a similar thing for ThinBSD. Look here:

http://www.thinbsd.org/cvsweb/ThinBSD/diskimage/files/

In addition to gettytab, I had to modify /etc/ttys to use the autologin
feature on only one vt.

You can then launch X from the user's .profile

-- 
Francois Tigeot, Zefyris
http://www.zefyris.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Machine Replication

2005-07-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:20:34PM -0700, Eli K. Breen wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have a good handle on how to replicate (read: image) a 
> freebsd machine from one machine to an ostensibly similar machine?

[...]

> Now whether my details are a bit off, that's fine, I don't want this to 
> be diluted in to discussion of minute frivolous details (as these things 
> are wont to do), but what I _am_ looking for is a tried, tested and true 
> method of FreeBSD machine replication, specifically for the 5.3+ releases.

I have found the following paper to be incredibly usefull :

http://www.pix.net/software/pxeboot/archive/SANE.pdf

I used some of the ideas in it to clone machines in the 5.1-5.2 era.

-- 
Francois Tigeot, CEO, Zefyris
http://www.zefyris.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What to use to get remote display from a amd64 machine?

2005-06-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:03:41 +0200
> Francois Tigeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Stock X is sufficient.
> 
> Well, stock X will probably work. I have used that in the past on a
> per-program basis. You know, the 'DISPLAY=host:0.0 program ...' routine.
> 
> I'm sorry that my little question lacked enough detail to avoid all this
> confusion. On the other hand, it sparked an interssting debate. :)
> The enironment is LAN.
> The reason that I forgot to mention stock X, is that vnc (which I'm
> partial to, since that's what I have been using) is so much easier to
> use:
> a) it gives me a complete X desktop which is separate from the X desktop
> I use when I log in locally. This means I can tailor the remote desktop
> to another wm, another display size and so on.

You could probably do this by customizing  ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession.
I agree it would not be the easiest thing to do, though

> b) it allows me to run the display in a web browser (java required)

This seems to be a good reason to use VNC.
 
> > My users use ThinBSD based thin clients to connect to a
> > FreeBSD/amd64 server.
> 
> And on the server you run xdm or something like that?

I run xdm, yes.
Since I do not like the "official" way to launch it from /etc/ttys, I made
a port which provides a script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d :

http://www.thinbsd.org/cvsweb/ThinBSD/ports/xdm-rc/

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What to use to get remote display from a amd64 machine?

2005-06-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:19:19PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > 
> > Stock X is sufficient.
> 
> That's really not a substitue for nxserver's performance... Assuming
> Torfinn is working over a high latency connection.

I assumed the environment was a lan.
For a wan, ssh display forwarding and compression could help.

> Perhaps run the nxserver compiled on i386 in compat32 mode... ?

I would be very interested by the results.

The only showstopper to obtain an amd64 binary seems to be the lack of
-fPIC somewhere in the Makefiles. Perhaps a future version could be run
natively.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What to use to get remote display from a amd64 machine?

2005-06-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> 
> What are people using for remote X displays on amd64 machines?

Stock X is sufficient.

My users use ThinBSD based thin clients to connect to a
FreeBSD/amd64 server.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Creating a mini install disk, for particular needs

2005-05-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:56:07AM +0100, Chris Phillips wrote:
> 
> I am trying to find a suitable alternative to our crappy, solid-state, 
> thin client boxes (because they are so awfully unreliable & the 
> manufacturer has also gone down the tubes).
> 
> We need a fairly painless way, to roll out a fresh install onto some 
> random i386 hardware we have lying around (there's a plentiful supply), 
> for any new users, who require a basic functioning GUI, with access to 
> graphical email client, web browser & 'rdesktop' (for the windows 
> applications, that they are all hooked on).

You may also try to use your PCs as thin clients.

Check out http://www.thinbsd.org/ , it is a small FreeBSD based system
to create X11 or Windows terminals.

(Don't be afraid by the release dates, the project is not dead).

> What I'd love to be able to do, is to create a FreeBSD (it's my 
> favorite) CD, that contains all that I need for these basic systems. 
> Either, set up so that the install is automated, with just the minimal 
> of setup, or so that it's got all the packages that I want & can all be 
> installed straight off the CD (perhaps by choosing the "All Packages" 
> option).
> 
> Is what I've described actually possible?

There are informations to script the install process in sysinstall(8)

I had to install FreeBSD and Linux on dozens of workstations before and
found out the CD thing was not the most practicable way.
I ended up doing a fairly complete install on a master machine and cloning
it via PXE booting and dd (disks were identicals).

Check out this paper for a similar technique:
http://www.pix.net/software/pxeboot/archive/SANE.pdf

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: PXEBOOT/TFTPBOOT + big MD_ROOT problem

2005-04-20 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:18:17PM -0700, David G. Lawrence wrote:
> 
>I assume you saw this in the tftpd manual page?
> 
> BUGS
>  Files larger than 33488896 octets (65535 blocks) cannot be transferred
>  without client and server supporting blocksize negotiation (RFC1783).
> 
>  Many tftp clients will not transfer files over 1678 octets (32767
>  blocks).

There is a PR open with a patch to fix this:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/67550

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Qt applications hang

2005-03-20 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2005 09:26, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:47:01PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > There's a recent entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING that may be relevant.
> >
> > I suspected at one time the system compiler to be busted, but I recompiled
> > everything with -O -pipe and the problem remains.
> >
> > Cc to -amd64 to see if there may be something architecture specific.
> >
> > [For the record, every QT application hang immediately when some menu
> > options are selected. The system is 5.4-PRERELEASE/amd64]
> 
> I have 5.4-PRE on my work amd64 box (kernel/world built a few days ago) and 
> I'm running KDE from ports in it without apparent problems.

The strange thing is, most of the things work (I have a user running kde from
an X terminal and not complaining).
Trying to open a file dialog (Location/Open Location in Konqueror) will
howewer result in a freezed gui.

There must be something locally broken, but so far I was unable to find it.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Qt applications hang

2005-03-19 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:47:01PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> There's a recent entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING that may be relevant.

Thanks, but I fail to see what is relevant in this case.

I suspected at one time the system compiler to be busted, but I recompiled
everything with -O -pipe and the problem remains.

Cc to -amd64 to see if there may be something architecture specific.

[For the record, every QT application hang immediately when some menu
options are selected. The system is 5.4-PRERELEASE/amd64]

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Qt applications hang

2005-03-19 Thread Francois Tigeot
I'm experiencing a very strange problem: everything on my system appears
to work fine, with the exception of QT-based applications.

When I launch one, the GUI appears normally and the menus are working. Most
of the menu items also appear to work fine.
As soon as I try to open a file selection dialog (File/Open Location in
konqueror), the whole GUI becomes irresponsive, but the application can still
be killed.

So far I have had the problem with konqueror and print/scribus

The machine is running 5.4-PRERELEASE/amd64.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SATA RAID Support

2005-02-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:21:17PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> 
> > Under heavy load (I/O load on the disks constantly over 200 tps, average
> > at about 250 tps, peaks over 600 tps) a random drive disconnects from
> > the RAID 10. After removing the drive from the config and rescanning the
> > bus, the drive does not show up anymore. The only way to get the drive
> > back is to unplug the drive (or switch the computer off, so that power
> > is removed).  After that there is no problem to rebuild the RAID with
> > the drive.
> 
> We were having problems with this even under light load, with Western
> Digital SATA disks (not Raptors I don't think). In some cases all of the
> disks would drop off the array. It was determined to be an incompatibility
> between the controller (8506, I believe) and the motherboard (Tyan S2721).

This is an other issue: 3Ware 8506 cards PCI timings are marginal and fail
with some mainboards (mainly Tyan and Intel ones if I remember correctly).
AFAIK, this is fixed with the 950x series.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SATA RAID Support

2005-02-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:05:43PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:33:39AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:31:22AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > > We had problems here with 3ware + 72GB Raptors (10 krpm), so we moved to 
> > 
> > What sort of problems ?
> > I was planning to use some sort of 3Ware/Raptor combination with amd64
> > -STABLE machines in the near future, and I am very interested by your
> > experience...
> 
> Under heavy load (I/O load on the disks constantly over 200 tps, average
> at about 250 tps, peaks over 600 tps) a random drive disconnects from
> the RAID 10. After removing the drive from the config and rescanning the
> bus, the drive does not show up anymore. The only way to get the drive
> back is to unplug the drive (or switch the computer off, so that power
> is removed).  After that there is no problem to rebuild the RAID with
> the drive.

Interesting. AFAIR the same sort of errors occured with some older WD
drives and 3Ware 750x controllers.
The solution was to flash the drives firmware.

A quick googling found some reference to the problem on this document:
http://japan.3ware.com/products/pdf/Drive_compatibility_list.pdf

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SATA RAID Support

2005-02-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:31:22AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> 
> We had problems here with 3ware + 72GB Raptors (10 krpm), so we moved to 

What sort of problems ?
I was planning to use some sort of 3Ware/Raptor combination with amd64
-STABLE machines in the near future, and I am very interested by your
experience...

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Merging phk's filedesc cleanup and lock pushdown.

2005-02-24 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:18:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days.  This
> is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes.  I have a patch
> available at:
> 
> http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/fdesc.patch
> 
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who can would test this.  It has been running
> on current for 3-4 months, depending on the bit, but there's always a
> chance of a botched merge.

World doesn't build with this patch:

cc -O -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W 
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type
-Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts 
-Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c: In function `dofiles':
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: error: storage size of 'filed0' isn't known
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: `NDFILE' undeclared (first use in 
this function)
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
reported only once
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.)
/usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: warning: unused variable `filed0'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
nice make buildworld  1209,00s user 251,75s system 78% cpu 31:04,65 total

This machine is an amd64 5.3-STABLE host. The same sources build nicely
without the patch.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD 5.4 Release Schedule

2005-02-02 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:43:03PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> 
> Just a heads-up to say that the 5.4 release activities will begin towards
> the end of February, with an expected release date of April 4th.

Will there be a MFC of the ata code ? SATA-II controllers are
beginning to show up quite often these days...

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Building your own FreeBSD installation CD-ROM

2005-01-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 06:14:52PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> 
> how does one go about creating a FreeBSD install CD-ROM? I'd like to be 
> able to build my own CD-ROM with as much as possible of the install 
> process done automatically. For instance, what parts of FreeBSD to 
> install: X or not, games or not, etc. etc. And which ports to install 
> straight away. I could also set up cfengine so that as soon as the 
> machine came to life it could go and connect to my cfengine repository 
> and download all the latest configurations to move into operational status.

There is some documentation in /usr/src/release on how to build a custom
release (I did it successfully around 4.4 time).

It is also possible to script the installer via a configuration file. Look at
sysinstall(8) manpage for details.

-- 
Francois Tigeot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"