Re: Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ?

2005-09-15 Thread Mariano Benedettini
Oliver,

Thanks, I'm going to keep 4BSD until ULE it's more mature :-)

 --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
 Von: Oliver Brandmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 An: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
 Betreff: Re: Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ?
 Datum: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:43:45 +0200
 
 Hi.
 
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:08:01PM -0300, Mariano Benedettini wrote:
  Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ?
 
 Only a fool :-)
 
 I suggest you better wait for some 6.x-RELEASE and an official statement 
 about using ULE. Although ULE in RELENG_6 has a lot of fixes, ULE in 
 RELENG_5 does not have, there are reports from time to time, that 
 suggest, that there still might be problems with ULE in some cases. 
 Apart from that is RELENG_6 befroe any 6.x-RELEASE probably not a good 
 idea for a production system.
 
 - Oliver
 
 
 -- 
 | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1  | Germany   D-14197 Berlin
 |
 | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW:   http://the.addict.de/
 |
 |   Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe.  
 |
 | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet!
 |
 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


High load averages on a 5.3-RELEASE

2005-09-14 Thread Mariano Benedettini
Hi people, I've also posted this message to freebsd-performance, with no
answer.
I have a mail server running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. It's a dual Xeon with 4gb
of ram.
The server is running Apache (serving Horde) , Postfix, Courier imapd w/SSL,
Amavisd. Also a Postgresql as Horde's storage.
The mail storage is accessed via NFS (this server is the nfs client).
The problem is that it's experiencing a really high load average (see the
top -S and vmstat -systat ) while the CPU's are relatively idle. I think
it's a IO problem
(nfs?), but I cant figure out what exactly is causing this.


last pid: 96776;  load averages: 13.60, 13.94, 18.26   up
22+01:45:44  17:08:08
1166 processes:8 running, 1087 sleeping, 71 waiting
CPU states: 12.3% user,  0.0% nice, 17.8% system,  2.1% interrupt, 67.8%
idle
Mem: 1637M Active, 1638M Inact, 320M Wired, 192M Cache, 112M Buf, 28M Free
Swap: 2023M Total, 216K Used, 2023M Free

  PID USERNAME  PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE  C   TIME   WCPUCPU
COMMAND
   11 root  1320 0K12K RUN3 492.1H 82.13% 82.13%
idle: cpu3
   14 root  1320 0K12K RUN0 487.0H 79.83% 79.83%
idle: cpu0
   12 root  1320 0K12K RUN2 487.0H 78.37% 78.37%
idle: cpu2
   13 root  1320 0K12K CPU1   1 463.9H 71.63% 71.63%
idle: cpu1
   24 root  -64 -183 0K12K CPU0   0 154:50  2.29%  2.29%
irq11: ohci0
79636 www 40 33532K 22264K sbwait 2   0:08  1.27%  1.27%
httpd
   78 root  -44 -163 0K12K WAIT   1 371:20  1.12%  1.12%
swi1: net
95810 root50  1844K  1432K ttyin  1   0:03  1.03%  1.03%
systat
59508 root50  1836K  1336K ttyin  3   5:56  0.98%  0.98%
systat
   79 root  -28 -147 0K12K WAIT   1 171:24  0.93%  0.93%
swi5: clock sio
72854 www960 34068K 22800K select 1   0:11  0.93%  0.93%
httpd
90730 www200 29720K 18452K lockf  0   0:02  0.93%  0.93%
httpd
77968 www 40 36816K 25556K sbwait 2   0:09  0.88%  0.88%
httpd
78081 www200 31916K 20640K lockf  1   0:07  0.83%  0.83%
httpd
96143 postfix960  3180K  2284K select 1   0:02  0.78%  0.78%
smtpd
70626 www200 33264K 21992K lockf  3   0:08  0.73%  0.73%
httpd
71231 root   960  2572K  1696K select 1   0:03  0.68%  0.68%
couriertls
87567 www 40 33276K 22040K sbwait 3   0:04  0.63%  0.63%
httpd
78109 www200 34228K 22968K lockf  1   0:08  0.49%  0.49%
httpd
71240 mfx960  2596K  1532K select 0   0:02  0.49%  0.49%
imapd
95217 vscan  200 20068K 18088K lockf  3   0:01  0.49%  0.49%
perl
79635 www200 34160K 22884K lockf  3   0:05  0.44%  0.44%
httpd
75988 pgsql   40 20436K 14468K sbwait 2   0:02  0.44%  0.44%
postgres
96754 postfix 40  3180K  2284K select 2   0:00  4.61%  0.44%
smtpd
79861 pgsql   40 20436K 14332K sbwait 0   0:01  0.39%  0.39%
postgres
90802 www200 33272K 22032K lockf  1   0:03  0.34%  0.34%
httpd
96763 postfix 40  3160K  2272K select 0   0:00  7.00%  0.34%
smtpd
96756 postfix 40  3088K  2204K select 3   0:00  3.08%  0.29%
smtp
85422 www200 34168K 22892K lockf  3   0:04  0.24%  0.24%
httpd
90750 www 40 33284K 22024K sbwait 1   0:02  0.24%  0.24%
httpd

5 usersLoad 11.65 13.51 18.06  14 sep 17:08


(this is ugly, sorry):

Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER  SWAP PAGER
Tot   Share  TotShareFree in  out in  out
Act 1624872   13936  321853627392  226332 count
All 3864628   39728  2312968   378336 pages
 Interrupts
Proc:r  p  d  s  wCsw  Trp  Sys  Int  Sof  Flt162 cow1138 total
 1 3 1k  5797  599 6050 1793  133  688 326888 wire1:
atkb
  1673300 act 6:
fdc0
 6.1%Sys   2.2%Intr  8.7%User  0.0%Nice 83.0%Idl  1681452 inact   128 8: rtc
|||||||||| 196908 cache   166 11:
ohc
===+   29424 free13:
npx
  daefr   14:
ata
Namei Name-cacheDir-cache 384 prcfr18 15:
ata
Calls hits% hits% react18 16:
cis
2790727560   99   pdwak   541 26:
bge
  252 zfodpdpgs   167 29:
bge
Disks   da0 pass0 248 ofodintrn   30:
ahc
KB/t  13.57  0.00  98 %slo-z   114464 buf 31:
ahc
tps  18 0 645 tfree   178 dirty   100 0: clk
MB/s   0.24  0.00  10 

Re: High load averages on a 5.3-RELEASE

2005-09-14 Thread Mariano Benedettini

Kris:

Thanks for your answer. What is the best way to measure the NFS 
performance ?


Mariano.

Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:11:47PM +0200, Mariano Benedettini wrote:


Hi people, I've also posted this message to freebsd-performance, with no
answer.
I have a mail server running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. It's a dual Xeon with 4gb
of ram.
The server is running Apache (serving Horde) , Postfix, Courier imapd w/SSL,
Amavisd. Also a Postgresql as Horde's storage.
The mail storage is accessed via NFS (this server is the nfs client).
The problem is that it's experiencing a really high load average (see the
top -S and vmstat -systat ) while the CPU's are relatively idle. I think
it's a IO problem
(nfs?), but I cant figure out what exactly is causing this.



Load average doesn't indicate a performance problem, it indicates a
lot of tasks running on your machine (which after all, is what
computers are designed to do :-).  Poor performance indicates a
performance problem :-)

You should measure your NFS performance to see if it is acceptable.
Upgrading to 5.4 or (better) 6.0 when it is released should provide
network and filesystem performance benefits, in general.

Kris

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ?

2005-09-14 Thread Mariano Benedettini
I have a dual Xeon running 5.3-RELEASE SMP, which I plan to upgrade to 
5.4, enabling SCHED_ULE.

Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ?
Is the performance significant better ?

Thanks in advance,
Mariano.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]