Re: Cannot set CPU frequency for 8th gen CPU

2018-07-18 Thread Dave Green
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, at 8:31 PM, Dave Green wrote:

> If I disable 5 of the 6 
> cores in the BIOS then setting frequency as above is successful.

Further, when setting:

# sysctl debug.cpufreq.verbose=1

A different 11.1 amd64 system with a 2nd gen 4 core processor reports:

cpufreq: setting abs freq 2500 on est0 (cpu 0)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2500 on est1 (cpu 1)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2500 on est2 (cpu 2)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2500 on est3 (cpu 3)

Whereas the 11.2 amd64 system with the 8th gen 6 core reports:

cpufreq: setting abs freq 2800 on est0 (cpu 1)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2800 on est1 (cpu 2)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2800 on est2 (cpu 3)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2800 on est3 (cpu 4)
cpufreq: setting abs freq 2800 on est3 (cpu 5)

For the second (faulty) system cpu0 is conspicuously missing and may explain 
why frequency can only be set on that machine with all but one core disabled?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Cannot set CPU frequency for 8th gen CPU

2018-07-18 Thread Dave Green
I have an 8th gen (i5-8400) processor installed in motherboard using the H370 
chipset (Gigabyte H370 HD3) with factory default BIOS configuration running 
FreeBSD 11.2 amd64. Although the correct number of cores (6) and available 
frequencies are correctly detected only the lowest frequency is usable:

# sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels
dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2801/65000 2800/65000 2700/61690 2500/55888 2400/52759 
2200/47301 2100/44946 1900/39204 1800/37000 1700/34277 1500/29546 1400/27531 
1200/22557 1100/20688 900/16549 800/14296

# sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq=2800
dev.cpu.0.freq: 800 -> 800

Accordingly powerd continues to try and raise the frequency in response to high 
system load but is unable to do so. If I disable 5 of the 6 cores in the BIOS 
then setting frequency as above is successful.

Has this been reproduced and/or what are the next steps I should take to 
investigate?

Attached is the obligatory dmesg which contains some complaints about ACPI 
firmware of unknown relevance?

--

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz (2808.23-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin="GenuineIntel"  Id=0x906ea  Family=0x6  Model=0x9e  Stepping=10
  
Features=0xbfebfbff
  
Features2=0x7ffafbbf
  AMD Features=0x2c100800
  AMD Features2=0x121
  Structured Extended 
Features=0x29c67af
  Structured Extended Features2=0x4000
  Structured Extended Features3=0xc00
  XSAVE Features=0xf
  VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID
  TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
real memory  = 17179869184 (16384 MB)
avail memory = 16386461696 (15627 MB)
Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600
ACPI APIC Table: 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 6 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 6 core(s)
ioapic0  irqs 0-119 on motherboard
SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #5 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #4 Launched!
Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1404113625 Hz quality 1000
random: entropy device external interface
kbd1 at kbdmux0
netmap: loaded module
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0x80ff4550, 0) error 19
random: registering fast source Intel Secure Key RNG
random: fast provider: "Intel Secure Key RNG"
nexus0
cryptosoft0:  on motherboard
aesni0:  on motherboard
acpi0:  on motherboard
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x33CCD (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x33CD6 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x343C1 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x343CA (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x34AB5 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x34ABE (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x351AA (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x351B3 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x3589F (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x358A8 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x35C52 (20171214/psloop-344)
ACPI Warning: Unsupported module-level executable opcode 0x70 at table offset 
0x35C5B (20171214/psloop-344)
Firmware Error (ACPI): Failure looking up 
[\134_SB.PCI0.RP04.PXSX._SB.PCI0.RP05.PXSX], AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/dswload2-312)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20171214/psobject-371)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \134_SB.PCI0.RP04.PXSX, AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/psparse-677)
Firmware Error (ACPI): Failure looking up 
[\134_SB.PCI0.RP08.PXSX._SB.PCI0.RP09.PXSX], AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/dswload2-312)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20171214/psobject-371)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \134_SB.PCI0.RP08.PXSX, AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/psparse-677)
Firmware Error (ACPI): Failure looking up 
[\134_SB.PCI0.RP12.PXSX._SB.PCI0.RP13.PXSX], AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/dswload2-312)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20171214/psobject-371)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \134_SB.PCI0.RP12.PXSX, AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/psparse-677)
Firmware Error (ACPI): Failure looking up [\134_SB.PCI0.RP05.PXSX.WIST], 
AE_NOT_FOUND (20171214/psargs-503)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \134CNDP, AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/psparse-677)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \134, AE_NOT_FOUND 
(20171214/psparse-677)
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
cpu0:  on acpi0
cpu1:  on acpi0
cpu2:  on acpi0
cpu3:  on acpi0
cpu4:  on acpi0
cpu5:  on acpi0
hpet0:  iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on acpi0
Timecounter "HPET" frequency 2400 Hz quality 950
Event timer 

Re: [FreeBSD-Stable] svn commit: r296462 - in stable/9: crypto/openssl/crypto/bio crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/doc/apps crypto/openssl/ssl secure/usr.bin/openssl/man

2016-03-09 Thread Craig Green

On 2016-03-09 5:19 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:

On 3/9/2016 5:06 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:


Can you please try the attached patch, which I also attached to PR
207783?  I think this will solve the crashes.

It should be enough to rebuild secure/lib/libcrypto, and install it.

Hi,
Yes it allows sshd to not crash on my one test case (secureCRT client)
so far!  Thanks.


Looks to work as well on the second server here that SSH was crashing on.


Thanks. :-)

Craig.
--
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [FreeBSD-Stable] svn commit: r296462 - in stable/9: crypto/openssl/crypto/bio crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/doc/apps crypto/openssl/ssl secure/usr.bin/openssl/man

2016-03-08 Thread Craig Green



On 2016-03-08 7:45 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:

Hi,
I tried on 2 separate boxes, and sshd segfaults when this rev is applied

---Mike


Just adding some debug logs showing a couple places where sshd exited. 
Encryption algorithm, kex and hmac didn't seem to matter.


Craig.
--


Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: rexec start in 5 out 5 
newsock 5 pipe 7 sock 8

Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: res_init()
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: HPN Disabled: 0, HPN Buffer 
Size: 65536
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; 
client software version SecureCRT_6.6.1 (x64 build 289) SecureCRT
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: no match: SecureCRT_6.6.1 
(x64 build 289) SecureCRT
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: Enabling compatibility mode 
for protocol 2.0
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: Local version string 
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20140420
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: list_hostkey_types: 
ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519

Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: kex: client->server 
aes256-ctr hmac-sha1 none
Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 sshd[40348]: debug1: kex: server->client 
aes256-ctr hmac-sha1 none

Mar  7 16:59:53 smtp1 kernel: pid 40348 (sshd), uid 0: exited on signal 11


Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: rexec start in 5 out 5 
newsock 5 pipe 7 sock 8

Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: res_init()
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: HPN Disabled: 0, HPN Buffer 
Size: 65536
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; 
client software version OpenSSH_6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20120901
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.1_hpn13v11 
FreeBSD-20120901 pat OpenSSH* compat 0x0400
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: Enabling compatibility mode 
for protocol 2.0
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: Local version string 
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20140420
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: list_hostkey_types: 
ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519

Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: kex: client->server 
aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: kex: server->client 
aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none

Mar  7 17:01:39 smtp1 sshd[46204]: debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
Mar  7 17:01:40 smtp1 kernel: pid 46204 (sshd), uid 0: exited on signal 11


Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: rexec start in 5 out 5 
newsock 5 pipe 7 sock 8

Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: res_init()
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: HPN Disabled: 0, HPN Buffer 
Size: 65536
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; 
client software version OpenSSH_6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20120901
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.1_hpn13v11 
FreeBSD-20120901 pat OpenSSH* compat 0x0400
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: Enabling compatibility mode 
for protocol 2.0
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: Local version string 
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20140420
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: list_hostkey_types: 
ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519

Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: kex: client->server 
aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: kex: server->client 
aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none

Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 sshd[47350]: debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
Mar  7 17:02:01 smtp1 kernel: pid 47350 (sshd), uid 0: exited on signal 11


Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: rexec start in 5 out 5 newsock 
5 pipe 7 sock 8

Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: res_init()
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: HPN Disabled: 0, HPN Buffer 
Size: 65536
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; 
client software version PuTTY_Release_0.60

Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: no match: PuTTY_Release_0.60
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: Enabling compatibility mode 
for protocol 2.0
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: Local version string 
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20140420
Mar  7 18:52:36 smtp1 sshd[1127]: debug1: list_hostkey_types: 

Re: Skylake Loader Performance 10.3-BETA3

2016-03-07 Thread Will Green

On 2016-03-07 17:24, Steven Hartland wrote:

On 07/03/2016 16:43, Will Green wrote:

On 4 Mar 2016, at 18:49, Mark Dixon <mnd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Will Green  sundivenetworks.com> writes:

I am happy to test patches and/or current on this server if that 
helps. If

you want more details on the

motherboard/system I have started a post on it at

http://buildwithbsd.org/hw/skylake_xeon_server.html
I've made the UEFI switch which worked fine, but I'm also happy to 
help out

with testing if anyone looks at this.

Are you booting from ZFS?
Unless I’ve missed something this isn’t yet supported by the 
installer, but it is possible to get working manually.




Pretty sure you missed something and those changes where merged, imp
should be able to confirm.


You're right: that was an error on my part. I've now got ZFS boot 
working with UEFI. :)


I booted the Skylake motherboard with 
FreeBSD-10.3-RC1-amd64-uefi-memstick.img and it successfully installed 
to ZFS *and* loaded at normal speed. Looks like UEFI is the way to go on 
Skylake systems. All tests have gone well so far.


Thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Skylake Loader Performance 10.3-BETA3

2016-03-07 Thread Will Green

> On 4 Mar 2016, at 18:49, Mark Dixon <mnd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Will Green  sundivenetworks.com> writes:
> 
>> I am happy to test patches and/or current on this server if that helps. If
> you want more details on the
>> motherboard/system I have started a post on it at
> http://buildwithbsd.org/hw/skylake_xeon_server.html
>> 
> 
> I've made the UEFI switch which worked fine, but I'm also happy to help out
> with testing if anyone looks at this.

Are you booting from ZFS?
Unless I’ve missed something this isn’t yet supported by the installer, but it 
is possible to get working manually.

Will
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Skylake Loader Performance 10.3-BETA3

2016-03-03 Thread Will Green
Hello,

I’ve been testing a new Skylake E3 Xeon server with 10.3-BETA3. The slow loader 
issue described on the forums https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/53511/ is 
still present. On my Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F motherboard with E3-1260L v5 it 
takes over ten minutes to get to kernel boot. After that performance seems 
normal (though I’m still testing). This issue occurs when booting the installer 
from a USB stick or when booting the installed OS over SATA. 

I understand using UEFI resolves this issue, although I only have one Skylake 
motherboard model on which to confirm this. I know this issue is unlikely to be 
fixed for 10.3 release, but I think it should be noted in the release and/or 
hardware notes. Skylake systems are going to be increasing numerous this year, 
especially now Skylake Xeons are starting to ship in volume. 

I am happy to test patches and/or current on this server if that helps. If you 
want more details on the motherboard/system I have started a post on it at 
http://buildwithbsd.org/hw/skylake_xeon_server.html

TIA
Will
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Problems adding Intel 750 to zfs pool

2015-07-20 Thread Will Green
I wonder if this is connected to NVMe?

Our SATA Intel DC S3500 drives (which are not that different to the 750s) TRIM 
much more quickly.

What does camcontrol think the secure erase time should be? For a 600GB S3500 
camcontrol accurately gives the secure erase time as 4 minutes:

# camcontrol security ada0

erase time4 min
enhanced erase time   4 min

Trimming drives before addition to a system is definitely worthwhile.

Will

 On 20 Jul 2015, at 10:28, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
 
 This will almost certainly be due to slow TRIM support on the device.
 
 Try setting the sysctl vfs.zfs.vdev.trim_on_init to 0 before adding the 
 devices.
 
 On 18/07/2015 05:35, dy...@techtangents.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've installed an Intel 750 400GB NVMe PCIe SSD in a Dell R320 running 
 FreeBSD 10.2-beta-1... not STABLE, but not far behind, I think. Apologies if 
 this is the wrong mailing list, or if this has been fixed in STABLE since 
 the beta.
 
 Anyway, I've gparted it into 2 partitions - 16GB for slog/zil and 357GB for 
 l2arc. Adding the slog partition to the pool takes about 2 minutes - machine 
 seems hung during that time. Ping works, but I can't open another ssh 
 session.
 
 Adding the l2arc doesn't seem to complete - it's been going 10 minutes now 
 and nothing. Ping works, but I can't log in to the local console or another 
 ssh session.
 
 I'm adding the partitions using their gpt names. i.e.
 zpool add zroot log gpt/slog
 zpool add zroot cache gpt/l2arc
 
 The system BIOS is up-to-date. The OS was a fresh 10.1 install, then 
 freebsd-update to 10.2-beta2. 10.1 exhibited the same symptoms.
 
 Root is on zfs.
 
 Device was tested to be working on Windows 8.1 on a Dell T1700 workstation.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dylan Just
 
 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Xeon D-1540 Support

2015-06-03 Thread Will Green
Hello,

Has anyone had any success running FreeBSD 10.1 on the Xeon D-1540 [1]? It’s a 
8-core Broadwell-based Xeon SOC with integrated GigE or 10GigE.

The combination of low power and support for 128 GB of ram makes them quite 
attractive. An example motherboard with this CPU is the Supermicro X10SDV-F 
[2]. The Supermicro web site shows support for FreeBSD 10.1 [3], but I haven’t 
seen any use in the wild. I will try to get hold of a board to test, but any 
advance information on support would be useful.

Thanks,
Will

[1] 
http://ark.intel.com/products/87039/Intel-Xeon-Processor-D-1540-12M-Cache-2_00-GHz
[2] http://www.supermicro.co.uk/products/motherboard/Xeon/D/X10SDV-F.cfm
[3] http://www.supermicro.co.uk/support/resources/OS/Broadwell-DE.cfm
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: File-Backed ZFS Kernel Panic still in 10.1-RELEASE (PR 195061)

2015-04-26 Thread Will Green
Thanks Steven. I’ll hold off releasing the updated tutorials for now.

 On 21 Apr 2015, at 17:45, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
 
 I did actually request this back in November, but I don't seem to have had a 
 reply so I'll chase.
 
 On 21/04/2015 16:23, Will Green wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have been updating my ZFS tutorials for use on FreeBSD 10.1. To allow 
 users to experiment with ZFS I use file-backed ZFS pools. On FreeBSD 10.1 
 they cause a kernel panic.
 
 For example a simple command like the following causes a panic: zpool create 
 /tmp/zfstut/disk1
 
 This issue was identified in PR 195061: 
 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195061
 And fixed in r274619 (2014-11-17): 
 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=274619
 
 However, even on 10.1-RELEASE-p9 the kernel panic still occurs (but doesn’t 
 on 11-CURRENT).
 
 Are there any plans to patch this in 10.1? I note it’s not in the errata.
 
 My tutorials are not the only ones that use file-backed ZFS: new users 
 experimenting with ZFS on FreeBSD are likely to encounter this issue.
 
 Thanks,
 Will
 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

File-Backed ZFS Kernel Panic still in 10.1-RELEASE (PR 195061)

2015-04-21 Thread Will Green
Hello,

I have been updating my ZFS tutorials for use on FreeBSD 10.1. To allow users 
to experiment with ZFS I use file-backed ZFS pools. On FreeBSD 10.1 they cause 
a kernel panic. 

For example a simple command like the following causes a panic: zpool create 
/tmp/zfstut/disk1

This issue was identified in PR 195061: 
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195061 
And fixed in r274619 (2014-11-17): 
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=274619 

However, even on 10.1-RELEASE-p9 the kernel panic still occurs (but doesn’t on 
11-CURRENT).

Are there any plans to patch this in 10.1? I note it’s not in the errata.

My tutorials are not the only ones that use file-backed ZFS: new users 
experimenting with ZFS on FreeBSD are likely to encounter this issue.

Thanks,
Will
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Mergemaster [was: Re: Ifconfig config of gif tunnels]

2002-10-15 Thread Lucky Green

Matthew Dillon wrote about mergemaster:
-
I also like the idea someone posted in regards to having a list of
files 'typically never modified by the sysop', e.g. /etc/defaults/*,
/etc/rc*, and so forth, though with the patches I have so far that
particular problem is not so big a deal any more (at least not for
me).
-

Mergemaster automatically updating the various default files, displaying
to the admin only the files the admin actually might want to see during
a normal upgrade, would be quite desirable to me. What would also be
helpful, though this may be diff's fault, would be if there were less
tendency for mergemaster to combine changes the admin likely wants to
make (adding a new user the OS requires) with changes the admin does not
want to make (removing surrounding entries out of master.passwd),
requiring the admin to make a note of mergemaster's suggestions followed
by editing the file by hand.

Thanks,
--Lucky Green


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Ssh problems and more after update

2002-08-12 Thread Lucky Green

I ran what into what, at first glance, sounds like similar problems with
ssh as some others on this list after updating a few days ago to
4.6.1-RELEASE-p10 from 4.6.1-RELEASE as of 2002-07-21.

I followed the usual sequence: buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel,
installworld, mergemaster. After reboot, I could ping the machine, but
all services, including sshd (from ports), smtpd (postfix), and httpd
(Apache) were down. Syslog was useless. The closest guess that I can
come up with is that for whatever reason, the OS failed to read rc.conf
and rc.d after boot. 

After a few reboots and some voodoo that may or may not have had any
impact (moving the sshd startup script from rc.conf to rc.d), the
services started by both rc.conf  and the services started via rc.d are
now again operational. The problem that remains is that I have no idea
what caused the failure. Since I don't have physical access to the box -
until I know what happened - I will be rather apprehensive rebooting the
machine once the next security flaw needs to be patched in what has
turned out to be a Summer of exploits.

If you have seen anything similar during a recent update, please let me
know.

Thanks,
--Lucky Green


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message