Re: Adding multiipul virtual domains?
Quoting ALLnetgroup : The server has 1 domain name already setup along with: sendmail Webmin Apache Web Server MySQL Apache Tomcat Squid Proxy SOCKS5 PERL Mod PERL PHP OpenSSH phpBB RoundCube WebMail When I add a new virtual host I would like the host to have it's own directory, website and the services above. Hmmm... the link Jeffery sent you solves the apache vhosts and you will need to read the manuals for the rest to get your configuration the way you want it and ask specific questions on the questions mailing list, possibly. ed Thank You --- On Tue, 6/23/09, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: From: Jeffrey Goldberg Subject: Re: Adding multiple virtual domains? To: allnetgr...@yahoo.com Cc: sta...@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 6:41 AM On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:46 PM, ALLnetgroup wrote: I have 3 virtual domains I need to add to FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE server using Terminal or Webmin preferably Terminal. If you are talking about virtual web domains, then this will be configured in the Apache configuration files. Assuming you have apache22 installed from ports, then look in /usr/local/etc/apache22/extra/http-vhosts.com That will point you to some apache documentation http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/ which you should review. As others have said, you need to clarify your question. Virtual domains with respect to what? I'm just guessing that you are talking about webserver vhosts and that you are running apache. If you are talking about virtual domains for email, then you will need to let us know whether you are running the FreeBSD default sendmail installation or some other mail server system. -j --Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Adding multiipul virtual domains?
Quoting ALLnetgroup : I am trying to add 3 domain name accounts: domain1.com domain2.com domain3.com to FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE sever with a Static IP the domain names are pointed to the server via godaddy. What do I need to do to add the domains to the BSD server? You really need to be more specific. To use the domains you will need at least: o. a functional DNS for each, be it on your freebsd box or not. o. Probably a mail server. Lot of options here most are in ports. o. A web server, probably apache or lighthttp that are both in ports. All of these can be handled by multiple programs, none of which are parts of the basic freebsd OS install except named, I suppose but that is if you are running your own dns, which I somehow doubt. Why don't you try reading the FreeBSD handbook that will answer most of what I mentioned. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html I would also suggest you read about the mailing lists on the http://www.freebsd.org web site to know which you should use and how to ask questions. Good luck, ed --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Glen Barber wrote: From: Glen Barber Subject: Re: Adding multiipul virtual domains? To: allnetgr...@yahoo.com Cc: sta...@freebsd.org Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 3:24 PM On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:23 PM, ALLnetgroup wrote: For 3 domain names I just received. Please don't just reply to me, because the rest of the list doesn't see your response. Your question is extremely vague. What are you trying to do? -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable
Quoting "Sean C. Farley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote: Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch seems to be stalled, so I am interested in the feedback. Possible rejects of the $FreeBSD$ chunks are fine. This patch works for me for most things. I am curious if the removal of bsm/audit_kevents.h in two files is desired or not. I have found that trying to run something on hulu.com in Hi-Res 480p instead of Std-Res 360p locks up Flash and the browser. I have to run killall npviewer.bin to get the browser back and remove the npviewer.bin.core file from my home directory. This is reproducible every time at least for me. Of course, this could be an nspluginwrapper or even Linux flash issue. It doesn't seem to be limited to stable. I have similar issues on current with npviewer.bin, having to do a killall several times a day if I use flash pages but once the new wares off, I'm sure I won't see it anymore ;) It sure beats having to open wine and windows firefox. ed ed Sean -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable
Quoting Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200 On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote: > I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable > on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though: > ** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9: >Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state > > I also thought that there might be a solution to the sound issue. > > Can anyone confirm the status? I would be happy to delete the IGNORE > line if I thought it would work and I know what changes might be needed > to get it to work. Even without sound, it would probably be useful. Too > many sites are using Flash 9 for the entry page and there is no way to > get to the site at all with Flash 7. From today's cvsup of Current, I still have the unmodified flash 9 port with the warning messages. Has this actually been commited to Current? Thanks, ed Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed last weekend, but haven't for some reason. The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedback: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127839 The relevant thread on emulation@ is: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2008-September/005311.html Tijl (and Paul). Thanks! I saw the entry for the fix in the 7.1 release notes, so assumed that it had been MFC'ed. I'll watch svn-src (or whatever cvs-src turned into) for the commit(s). I never have read emulation, so I need to go read the discussion. Thanks again! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Atheros (ath) MSI wireless embedded chipset fails to attach on 7.0-STABLE
Quoting Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Sack wrote: Hello: I have installed FreeBSD-7.0-amd64 stable on my new AMD X2 Turon based notebook, a MSI-1710A (GX710Ax) which has a generic embedded controller. During boot up I notice that ATH complains with: ath_rate: version 1.2 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) ath0: mem 0xfd7f-0xfd7f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 I have the same Atheros 5424/2424 on my Acer aspire laptop and it works great by installing the patch from Sam, http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-20080528.tgz Building a new kernel and then adding your configuration in rc.conf. good luck, ed ath0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfd7f ath0: [MPSAFE] ath0: [ITHREAD] ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13 device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 HAL status 13 from the header file seems to indicate that the 7.0-STABLE driver doesn't support my hardware revision. Here is my pciconf -l output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x79101002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x79131002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:4:0: class=0x060400 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x79141002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:6:0: class=0x060400 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x79161002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:7:0: class=0x060400 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x79171002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:18:0:class=0x01018f card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43801002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:0: class=0x0c0310 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43871002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:1: class=0x0c0310 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43881002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:2: class=0x0c0310 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43891002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:3: class=0x0c0310 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x438a1002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:4: class=0x0c0310 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x438b1002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:19:5: class=0x0c0320 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43861002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:20:0: class=0x0c0500 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43851002 rev=0x14 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:20:1:class=0x01018a card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x438c1002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:20:2: class=0x040300 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x43831002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:20:3: class=0x060100 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x438d1002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:20:4: class=0x060401 card=0x chip=0x43841002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:24:0: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x11001022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:24:1: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x11011022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:24:2: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x11021022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:24:3: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x11031022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0:0: class=0x03 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x95811002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0:1: class=0x040300 card=0xaa081462 chip=0xaa081002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x10261a3b chip=0x001c168c rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:5:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:4:0:class=0x060700 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x71341217 rev=0x21 hdr=0x02 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:4:2: class=0x080500 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x71201217 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:4:3: class=0x068000 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x71301217 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:4:4: class=0x0c0010 card=0x42cd1462 chip=0x00f71217 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 ath0 is listed as rev=0x01 so I'm a little confused why I got HAL status 13. Does anyone know if this chipset is supported in 7.0-STABLE? If not, is it possible to try CURRENT on 7.0 which may fix it? I've attached my complete dmesg output. Again, any feedback would be much appreciated! Try the hal in http://www.freebsd.org/~sam. Again Sam, thanks for this, it worked for me... -aps ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
