How to clear the 32-bit ldconfig error in 64-bit FreeBSD?
like this: ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/compat 32-bit compatibility ldconfig path: /usr/local/lib32/compat .: Can't open %%RC_SUBR%%: No such file or directory uname -a: FreeBSD lanshuweb2 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #2: Tue May 11 10:04:28 UTC 2010 r...@lanshuweb2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mlh amd6 /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/mlh: ... options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET# InterNETworking #optionsINET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options SCTP# Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options UFS_GJOURNAL# Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device #optionsNFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client #optionsNFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server #optionsNFSLOCKD# Network Lock Manager #optionsNFS_ROOT# NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT #optionsMSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS# Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization options COMPAT_43TTY# BSD 4.3 TTY compat (sgtty) #optionsCOMPAT_IA32 # Compatible with i386 binaries #optionsCOMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 #optionsCOMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI #optionsKTRACE # ktrace(1) support #optionsSTACK # stack(9) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES # POSIX-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128# Prevent printf output being interspersed. options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV# install a CDEV entry in /dev options HWPMC_HOOKS # Necessary kernel hooks for hwpmc(4) options AUDIT # Security event auditing options MAC # TrustedBSD MAC Framework options FLOWTABLE # per-cpu routing cache #optionsKDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in #optionsKDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks # Make an SMP-capable kernel by default options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel ... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
This patch must be used in CURRENT?? cvsup src with tag=. put and upzip the patch to /usr/src usepatch zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file? Is it right? I have done following what I said,but find a few file in /usr/src -rw-r--r--1 root wheel 4166 Oct 23 13:37 sha256.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 sha256.c.orig drwxr-xr-x 24 root wheel 26 Oct 23 12:25 share -rw-r--r--1 root wheel11391 Oct 23 13:37 spare.t -rw-r--r--1 root wheel10335 Oct 23 13:37 spare.t.orig drwxr-xr-x 56 root wheel 57 Oct 23 13:08 sys drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 15 Oct 12 10:48 tools -rw-r--r--1 root wheel55965 Oct 23 13:37 u8_textprep.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 u8_textprep.c.orig drwxr-xr-x 228 root wheel 230 Oct 23 13:11 usr.bin drwxr-xr-x 195 root wheel 197 Oct 23 13:11 usr.sbin -rw-r--r--1 root wheel11075 Oct 23 13:37 zfs.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfs.c.orig -rw-r--r--1 lhm wheel 4548386 Oct 23 13:27 zfs_20080727.patch -rw-r--r--1 root wheel19599 Oct 23 13:37 zfsboot.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsboot.c.orig -rw-r--r--1 root wheel31739 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.c.orig -rw-r--r--1 root wheel39098 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.h -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.h.orig -rw-r--r--1 root wheel12492 Oct 23 13:37 zfsldr.S -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsldr.S.orig -rw-r--r--1 root wheel 5531 Oct 23 13:37 zfssubr.c -rw-r--r--1 root wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfssubr.c.orig Is this correct?? 2008/10/23 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]: lhmwzy wrote: where is the patch? I can't find it in freebsd-fs@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20080727.patch.bz2 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
What's you mean? This patch is not suit for Current or Current has alreday have this patch? 2008/10/23 Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 lhmwzy wrote: This patch must be used in CURRENT?? cvsup src with tag=. put and upzip the patch to /usr/src usepatch zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file? Is it right? [...] No. Current has been progressed too much for this patch to apply. Cheers, -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkAGSQACgkQi+vbBBjt66CJIgCfQwnKSJZc/QeyjvW3J8pBoZyv LKkAnRx1B8MdXNYwWjj9oas9NgXI0vtk =qSC2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
OK.close this thread.:) 2008/10/23 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:35:24PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: What's you mean? This patch is not suit for Current or Current has alreday have this patch? The patch was made against CURRENT's code dated August 27th. There have been too many changes to CURRENT between August 27th and now for the patch to apply cleanly/correctly. Finally, this thread has gone from talking about user-error when creating a ZFS pool to how to patch CURRENT to present-day ZFS code. This is NOT the correct mailing list for CURRENT items. Please start a new thread on the freebsd-current mailing list instead. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
$zfs create www/lhm cannot create 'www/lhm': permission denied How to do this or when can do this? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
Tks very much for your reply. I'm very sorry for the last mail,I didn't see the CC is empty,I'm not deliberately. 2008/10/22 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:54:49PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: hmm... I transfer data to a remote machine use zfs. for example: #zfs send pool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh -l lhm 10.67.141.80 zfs receive www/102 If login into 10.67.141.80 throught non-root user,it says: cannot receive: permission denied cannot send 'pool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]': Broken pipe But login into a remote machine use root through ssh is not a good idea,right? 2008/10/22 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:13:21PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: $zfs create www/lhm cannot create 'www/lhm': permission denied How to do this or when can do this? Creating a filesystem is something that can only be done by root. I'm not sure what gave you the impression non-root users can do this...? This problem has nothing to do with ZFS, it has to do with SSH. You need to do a few things for this to work. Here's a very quick way: 1) Make a public key on the machine you're doing zfs send from. Run ssh-keygen as root 2) Place contents of /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub in /root/.ssh/authorized_keys on 10.67.141.80. Make sure the /root/.ssh directory is perm 0700, and authorized_keys is perm 0600. 3) On 10.67.141.80, edit /etc/ssh/sshd_config and change this line: #PermitRootLogin no ...to: PermitRootLogin without-password 4) Send a SIGHUP signal to the master sshd process. This might disconnect any existing SSH sessions to the machine: kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` If you're concerned about what without-password does, read the man page. It WILL NOT let people SSH into the root account, UNLESS they have the private key (on zfs_send_host). That's the ONLY WAY they can get in as root. You may want to secure things down a bit more by editing /root/.ssh/authorized_keys on 10.67.141.80 to only allow certain commands to be executed (specifically zfs receive). You can look on Google for how to do this. Finally, why did you remove the mailing list from the CC list? Now no one knows what we've discussed, which isn't good. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
Yes,that's is what I want to say. In other word is the command zfs allow and zfs unallow I think it is not Support chflags(2) which is described in at the bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS 2008/10/22 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Creating a filesystem is something that can only be done by root. I'm not sure what gave you the impression non-root users can do this...? He probably though that because it's possible in the current Solaris implementation of ZFS: http://blogs.sun.com/marks/entry/zfs_delegated_administration I thought this hadn't been ported, but taking a quick look at the bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS it appears it's now done, which is cool :) -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
But what is Jeremy Chadwick said is also a good solution for my problem. Tks Jeremy Chadwick again. 2008/10/22 lhmwzy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes,that's is what I want to say. In other word is the command zfs allow and zfs unallow I think it is not Support chflags(2) which is described in at the bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS 2008/10/22 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Creating a filesystem is something that can only be done by root. I'm not sure what gave you the impression non-root users can do this...? He probably though that because it's possible in the current Solaris implementation of ZFS: http://blogs.sun.com/marks/entry/zfs_delegated_administration I thought this hadn't been ported, but taking a quick look at the bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS it appears it's now done, which is cool :) -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ZFS
I think the time is when FB8.0 out. 2008/10/22 David Peall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi While we are on the topic, I had a brief but happy encounter with ZFS while dump was broken on UFS2. Is there any indication as to when this would be suitable for a production environment? Some of the tools build in to ZFS are very useful... Regards -- David Peall :: IT Manager e-Schools' Network :: http://www.esn.org.za/ http://www.esn.org.za/ Phone +27 (021) 674-9140 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system panic: RAID5 problem or zfs problem
First we create a pool name www: zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 Then replace da6 with a new disk. when reboot the box,panic when booting: ZFS:vdev failure,zpool=ww type=vdev.bad_label painc:solaris assert:vdev_config_sync(rvd,txg)==0,file:/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/oensolaris/utf/common/fs/zfs/spa.c,line:3014 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system panic: RAID5 problem or zfs problem
YES. zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 should be: zpool create www raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 sorry for my mistake. I redo it again. All things go damn WELL. I can't tell what's wrong now. 2008/10/22 Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:33:44PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: First we create a pool name www: zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 Um, this isn't a RAID - this is a simple concatination of disks. I think what you meant to do was: zpool create www raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 Otherwise, you'll just append all disks, and it makes sense that the system doesn't work... Regards, -- Rink P.W. Springer- http://rink.nu Anyway boys, this is America. Just because you get more votes doesn't mean you win. - Fox Mulder ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system panic: RAID5 problem or zfs problem
I think I have found the problem. I want to do zpool create www raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6,but make a mistake,type zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6. Then I remove one disk. Then reboot,there is a panic. I know this is my misktake.But should FreeBSD panic or FreeBSD go well but zpool crash only? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system panic: RAID5 problem or zfs problem
I think I have found the problem. I want to do zpool create www raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6,but make a mistake,type zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6. Then I remove one disk.Shutdown system and add a new disk. The two disks have an identical size. Then reboot,there is a panic. I know this is my misktake.But should FreeBSD panic or FreeBSD go well but zpool crash only I make too mistakes tonight.:( 2008/10/22 lhmwzy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think I have found the problem. I want to do zpool create www raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6,but make a mistake,type zpool create www da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6. Then I remove one disk. Then reboot,there is a panic. I know this is my misktake.But should FreeBSD panic or FreeBSD go well but zpool crash only? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system panic: RAID5 problem or zfs problem
One thing:must copy some data to the pool,remove one disk,shutdown,add a new disk,start the box,get the panic. My box uname -a: FreeBSD freebsd.lpcy.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Oct 21 12:02:30 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?
where is the patch? I can't find it in freebsd-fs@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/10/23 Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes,that's is what I want to say. In other word is the command zfs allow and zfs unallow I think it is not Support chflags(2) which is described in at the bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS Sorry, my unclear use of english! I didn't mean the last item, I meant that it was near the bottom of the page. Look at the line above the 'chflags' one - Delegated Administration is what you are after. Not here yet, but hopefully soon... You can already test it on CURRENT if you apply the patch Pawel posted on freebsd-fs@ and freebsd-current@ a while ago. Fabian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
OK.It's my mistake.
Improve it again:
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf(%.2fM\n,j/1024/1024)}'
2008/10/8 Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
Review your 'ls -lh' output; what's 100Bananas + 10Kiwifruit + 1Melon?
$ find . -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
1.15975e+06M
Took several minutes to come up with the wrong answer :)
$ /root/bin/dirsize .
6906276646
Took 2.75 seconds, giving actual total of the file sizes.
$ du -d0 .
6781976 .
Took 1.5 seconds, and comes to 69447434424, ie bytes allocated for those
files. All on a 300MHz Celeron.
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it
will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize path
And very handy it is too, even without compressed ZFS, thanks Andrew.
cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the Scheduler SCHED_core development now?
Is it still alive? Is it replaced by SCHED_ULE? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
You're right. I turn off the compression,everything go well. So this is my problem,not a ZFS of FreeBSD problme. Tks for reply. 2008/10/7 Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: .00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - Turn compression off and retry. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
sorry,I make a mistake. It is a filesystem,not a volume. 2008/10/7 Holger Kipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: according to zfs manpage: Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as an implicit quota. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
My system #uname -a FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4: Mon Oct 6 15:02:42 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64 zfs version: ZFS filesystem version 6 ZFS storage pool version 6 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs quota question
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - pool/lhm mountedyes- pool/lhm quota 1M local pool/lhm reservationnone default pool/lhm recordsize 128K default But I cp 10 files,per file size is 2.4M to pool/lhm #ll -h /pool/lhm total 1013 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 ddd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd2 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd24 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.1M Oct 7 17:19 dd247 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 kldstat.core #du -hs /pool/lhm 1.0M. I am puzzled,the what's zfs quota mean? I understand is file quota,that can't put files which total size larger than 1M. But it seems my understanding is wrong. Anybody give a idea? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
Yes,this is a problem. In my case,du -h displays 1M,but the actual size is about 24M. 2008/10/7 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)? Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc. On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files are in actual bytes on a compressed ZFS filesystem, aas opposed to space on the disc ? I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will fit onto a CD or not :-) -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize path
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
Yes. It seems that nobody is interested in this. -Matt would not port is to FreeBSD,which is a big regretful. 2008/10/1 Derek Kuli��ski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Carlos, Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 5:57:06 PM, you wrote: Do you subscribe freebsd-stable? This has bee discussed recently in this list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-September/045506.html I wouldn't call it discussion. It was mentioned and then quickly it was forgotten. BTW: Matt Dillon, is the founder of DragonflyBSD, which apparently already supports HAMMER. As far as I know, no actual FreeBSD developer commented in that thread yet. -- Best regards, Derekmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise MY hand! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
Guys, please don't start a flamewar. And lhmwzy we discussed this on the DFly lists. It's really up to them... that is, a programmer who has an interest, inclination, and time. It isn't really fair to try to push it. You're right. I personally believe that the FreeBSD community as a whole should focus on ZFS for now. It has the momentum and the most interest on their lists. -Matt That's OK. The olny thing we can do is waiting. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
That's it. Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait. Waiting is such a bad thing... 2008/10/1 Derek Kuli��ski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello lhmwzy, Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 11:10:24 PM, you wrote: Yes. It seems that nobody is interested in this. -Matt would not port is to FreeBSD,which is a big regretful. I'm pretty sure there are people who are interested, it looks more like there are no people who're capable of doing this and have time. -- Best regards, Derekmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] An unemployed court jester is no one's fool. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
Yes,this is a way. I would do as you said if I need to do so. 2008/10/1 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:29:12PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: That's it. Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait. Waiting is such a bad thing... If this functionality is really something you want/need, you should consider finding a kernel programmer who would be willing to port it, for financial exchange (in English: you will be paying them $XX/hour to port it to FreeBSD). This has happened in the past for some key features. Like I said, it all depends on how much it matters to you. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
I think port HAMMER fs to FreeBSD is easier than any other fs like ZFS. Would anybody do this? I do not have the skill or I will do this.:) links: http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/index.shtml http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/hammer.pdf ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can FreeBSD 5.3R support the RAID card MegaRAID SCSI 320-2E card?
I have search amr on http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=amrsektion=4manpath=FreeBSD+5.3-RELEASE It said support the following: · AMI MegaRAID 320-1 · AMI MegaRAID 320-2 · AMI MegaRAID 320-4X · AMI MegaRAID Series 418 Anyone knows amr supports MegaRAID SCSI 320-2E card? TKS. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ?
Anybody did this? Any help is appreciateed ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
