RE: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-23 Thread Duane H. Hesser

Big Brother?

home: http://maclawran.ca/bb-dnld/index.html

demo: http://maclawran.ca/bb-dnld/new-demo.html

--
Duane H. Hesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-23 Thread

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Tom wrote:

Another way to the monitor system performance in conjunction to snmp is try to
use the MRTG package, in the contrib directory u can find a lot of useful and
working plugins that will monitor system performance.




> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Gong Wei wrote:
> 
> > We also have a few Solaris machines around.  We've purchased a SNMP agent
> > from Empire Technology (www.empiretech.com) which can report various system
> > performance related parameters, like swap usage, system load, cpu
> > utilization, number of open file descriptor, number of processes, etc.
> > 
> > The bad news is that their product doesn't support FreeBSD, although it does
> > support Linux.  So we cannot use this tool to monitor the system
> > performance.  Instead, we need something else which can do roughly the same
> > thing.
> > 
> > Among so many parameters our immediate interests is the following:
> > *   CPU utilization, % used in Kernel space vs % used in user space
> > *   RAM utilization
> > *   SWAP utilization
> > *   Network bandwidth usage
> > *   number of file descriptors used
> > 
> > As ususal, any hints/comments are more than welcomed.  Please do mail a copy
> > of your response to me directly.  Thanks!
> 
>   The ucd-snmp package includes a snmp daemon (snmpd).  That last time I
> did a snmpwalk on it, it reported lots of stuff like you want.  The funny
> part, is that this server probably works on Solaris too, and doesn't cost
> anything!
> 
>   BTW, I usually get the network bandwidth off the switch the server is
> plugged into though.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-23 Thread Mike Nowlin


> We also have a few Solaris machines around.  We've purchased a SNMP agent
> from Empire Technology (www.empiretech.com) which can report various system
> performance related parameters, like swap usage, system load, cpu
> utilization, number of open file descriptor, number of processes, etc.
> 
> The bad news is that their product doesn't support FreeBSD, although it does
> support Linux.  So we cannot use this tool to monitor the system
> performance.  Instead, we need something else which can do roughly the same
> thing.
> 
> Among so many parameters our immediate interests is the following:
> * CPU utilization, % used in Kernel space vs % used in user space
> * RAM utilization
> * SWAP utilization
> * Network bandwidth usage
> * number of file descriptors used
> 
> As ususal, any hints/comments are more than welcomed.  Please do mail a copy
> of your response to me directly.  Thanks!
> 

I've been writing a program to monitor various values dealing with SNMP --
it's not finished, but it works.  Basically, you tell it what to watch,
and if the values go outside defined thresholds or certain values are/are
not met, it triggers an "alert" -- mail, paging (both TAP and SNPP), etc.
Right now, it's running under Linux with ucd-snmp, but porting it over to
FreeBSD should be simple -- the errors I'm getting are dumb ones that are
easily fixed.  If anybody's interested, let me know -- it's not available
to the general public (I'm sorta embarresed by the code), but the geeks of
the world can get their hands on what I have so far by asking.

mike

(I'll include one of the config files for your browsing and commentary.)






# Machines at SML
#doublewalk {
#name "r2d2_processlist"
#host "r2d2.smlab.com"
#community "Mlx-20L"
#fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrorflag"
#tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrmessage"
#frequency 41
#mode 0
#alert "mike_pager"
#}

#doublewalk {
 #   name "r2d2_df"
 #   host "r2d2.smlab.com"
 #   community "Mlx-20L"
 #   fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrorflag"
 #   tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrormsg"
 #   frequency 42
 #   mode 0
 #   alert "mike_pager"
#}

doublewalk {
name "palpatine_pslist"
host "palpatine.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrmessage"
frequency 41
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "palpatine_df"
host "palpatine.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrormsg"
frequency 42
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "watto_pslist"
host "watto.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrmessage"
frequency 41
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "watto_df"
host "watto.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrormsg"
frequency 42
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

# check owen's transmit.LOCK lockfile for the reporting/paging system to make
# sure it's not too long...
reportchain {
name "owen_txlockfile"
host "owenpub.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
oidroot ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.50.101"
frequency 60
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "owen_processload"
host "owenpub.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.loadtable.laentry.laerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.loadtable.laentry.laerrmessage"
frequency 51
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "owen_df"
host "owenpub.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.disktable.dskentry.dskerrormsg"
frequency 52
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
alert "mike_mail"
}

doublewalk {
name "owen_processlist"
host "owenpub.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.proctable.prentry.prerrmessage"
frequency 53
mode 0
alert "mike_pager"
}

doublewalk {
name "tarkin_processload"
host "www.smlab.com"
community "Mlx-20L"
fromoid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis.loadtable.laentry.laerrorflag"
tooid ".1.3.6.1.4.enterprises.ucdavis

Re: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas David Rivers

It turns out one of the principles at Empire Technologies is
a friend of mine.  I'll send him a note regarding a FreeBSD
version and see what comes out of it.

- Dave Rivers -



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-22 Thread Tom

On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Gong Wei wrote:

> We also have a few Solaris machines around.  We've purchased a SNMP agent
> from Empire Technology (www.empiretech.com) which can report various system
> performance related parameters, like swap usage, system load, cpu
> utilization, number of open file descriptor, number of processes, etc.
> 
> The bad news is that their product doesn't support FreeBSD, although it does
> support Linux.  So we cannot use this tool to monitor the system
> performance.  Instead, we need something else which can do roughly the same
> thing.
> 
> Among so many parameters our immediate interests is the following:
> * CPU utilization, % used in Kernel space vs % used in user space
> * RAM utilization
> * SWAP utilization
> * Network bandwidth usage
> * number of file descriptors used
> 
> As ususal, any hints/comments are more than welcomed.  Please do mail a copy
> of your response to me directly.  Thanks!

  The ucd-snmp package includes a snmp daemon (snmpd).  That last time I
did a snmpwalk on it, it reported lots of stuff like you want.  The funny
part, is that this server probably works on Solaris too, and doesn't cost
anything!

  BTW, I usually get the network bandwidth off the switch the server is
plugged into though.

Tom



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: 3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-22 Thread Chuck Youse


I'm assuming that you've eliminated the possibility of running this under
Linux emulation mode?

It may be that the snmp agent diddles too closely with kernel structures
to allow for this, but there are emulatable ways to perform each of the
tasks listed..

Chuck


On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Gong Wei wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> We have a few 3.3 Stable production servers lying around the campus to serve
> the university population.  As usual, we need some means to manage/monitor
> the server performance closely.
> 
> We also have a few Solaris machines around.  We've purchased a SNMP agent
> from Empire Technology (www.empiretech.com) which can report various system
> performance related parameters, like swap usage, system load, cpu
> utilization, number of open file descriptor, number of processes, etc.
> 
> The bad news is that their product doesn't support FreeBSD, although it does
> support Linux.  So we cannot use this tool to monitor the system
> performance.  Instead, we need something else which can do roughly the same
> thing.
> 
> Among so many parameters our immediate interests is the following:
> * CPU utilization, % used in Kernel space vs % used in user space
> * RAM utilization
> * SWAP utilization
> * Network bandwidth usage
> * number of file descriptors used
> 
> As ususal, any hints/comments are more than welcomed.  Please do mail a copy
> of your response to me directly.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



3.3 Stable Performance Monitoring

1999-10-22 Thread Gong Wei

Hi all,

We have a few 3.3 Stable production servers lying around the campus to serve
the university population.  As usual, we need some means to manage/monitor
the server performance closely.

We also have a few Solaris machines around.  We've purchased a SNMP agent
from Empire Technology (www.empiretech.com) which can report various system
performance related parameters, like swap usage, system load, cpu
utilization, number of open file descriptor, number of processes, etc.

The bad news is that their product doesn't support FreeBSD, although it does
support Linux.  So we cannot use this tool to monitor the system
performance.  Instead, we need something else which can do roughly the same
thing.

Among so many parameters our immediate interests is the following:
*   CPU utilization, % used in Kernel space vs % used in user space
*   RAM utilization
*   SWAP utilization
*   Network bandwidth usage
*   number of file descriptors used

As ususal, any hints/comments are more than welcomed.  Please do mail a copy
of your response to me directly.  Thanks!




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message