Re: 4.6 stable to 4.6.2 stable
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:56:21 +0100 From: Jeff Penn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0400, RUS wrote: #cd /usr/src #make buildworld #make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel #make installkernel KERNCONF=mykernel after reboot to single mode #make installworld #margemaster and reboot I always clean out /usr/obj. You can also add the 2 new mergemaster calls using -p -C options: cd /usr/obj chflags -R noschg * rm -rf * cd /usr/src mergemaster -p make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL shutdown -r now boot -s fsck -p mount -u / mount -a -t ufs swapon -a cd /usr/src make installworld mergemaster mergemaster -C And, don't forget 'adjkerntz -i' before you 'make installworld' so that you won't be installing files before they were built. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
Just made/installed world after a cvsup yesterday. Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release revision I can't recall. In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. --Morgan Davis To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
RE: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
Ah, yes. *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 Thanks for the explanation/reminder Brooks. --Morgan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brooks Davis Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:03 PM To: Morgan Davis Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release revision I can't recall. In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't ever run 4.6.2. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release revision I can't recall. In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't ever run 4.6.2. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 msg48785/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
