Lefteris Tsintjelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not sure if I do something wrong here or it is suppose to work that
way but the async option doesn't seem to work for partitions that have
soft-updates turned on. Can someone please clarify the difference and if
the speed difference (if any) is significant when using the async option
instead of the soft-updates for cases such as the /usr/obj or as a squid
data storage? Is async preferred over soft-updates when data loss is not
a big issue?
With softupdates, everything is asynchronous so the option doesn't make
sense.
For improving squid filesystem performance, have you mounted the
partition with noatime? That might make some difference.
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
