Re: Does quota still require a custom kernel in FreeBSD 9?

2013-06-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 09:44:15PM +0200, Peter Olsson wrote:
> Just wondering if a custom kernel with options QUOTA
> is still needed in FreeBSD 9. I have no test server
> available right now to test this.
> 
> According to the handbook it is needed, but I found
> in a post from 2011 that it would be entered into
> GENERIC, so the handbook statement might be old?
> 
> My reason for asking is that I'm about to convert
> from source build to freebsd-update in all servers,
> so I would like to revert to GENERIC wherever possible.
> 
> (If it is still needed, are there any plans for
> removing this need?)

Option QUOTA is present in the GENERIC kernels on HEAD and stable/9.
I doubt that there is a release where the option is turned on,
i.e. 9.1 kernels most likely do not have QUOTA.


pgpfYXcwnS3rH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Does quota still require a custom kernel in FreeBSD 9?

2013-06-13 Thread Peter Olsson
Just wondering if a custom kernel with options QUOTA
is still needed in FreeBSD 9. I have no test server
available right now to test this.

According to the handbook it is needed, but I found
in a post from 2011 that it would be entered into
GENERIC, so the handbook statement might be old?

My reason for asking is that I'm about to convert
from source build to freebsd-update in all servers,
so I would like to revert to GENERIC wherever possible.

(If it is still needed, are there any plans for
removing this need?)

Thanks!

-- 
Peter Olssonp...@leissner.se
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"