Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, October 19, 2012 2:26:45 pm Alex de Joode wrote:
> https://sabotage.org/FBSD/FBSD-9.1RC2.jpg
> 
> Screen shot. Basicly the only diff between the two r210 are the disks, 
> one has 2x2TB (works) and the one that has 2x1Tb fails with the above error.
> 
> Both are sw/ mirrored. No hw/ raid and ACHI sata settings.

Hummm, somehow we are executing data, not code:

  8c 39 00 00 01 82 44 45  4c 4c 20 20 50 45 5f 53  |.9DELL  PE_S|

That isn't a valid instruction. :(

Also, your eip value is not anything that would be normal.

Actually, your eip value looks like a pointer into the BIOS (0xf000:bf6a).

I bet something in your BIOS had a buffer overrun and trashed the stack or
some such.  Or it overran an I/O buffer which trashed the return stack of
the userland process somehow.

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


RE: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-19 Thread Alex de Joode
https://sabotage.org/FBSD/FBSD-9.1RC2.jpg

Screen shot. Basicly the only diff between the two r210 are the disks, 
one has 2x2TB (works) and the one that has 2x1Tb fails with the above error.

Both are sw/ mirrored. No hw/ raid and ACHI sata settings.


: -Original Message-
: From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
: Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 3:30 PM
: To: Alex de Joode
: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...
: 
: on 19/10/2012 00:07 Alex de Joode said the following:
: > Updated two 9.1-RC1 machines (both R210, dual GEOM MIRRORED disk)
: >
: >
: > 1 went OK;
: > 1 went belly up (see attachment) (after the 1st reboot)
: 
: There is no spoon^Wattachment.
: Consider sending a link.
: 
: > -  Invalid format
: >
: > -  BTX halted.
: >
: >
: > Any ideas why ? (need to upgrade more machines without KVM access )
: 
: 
: --
: Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/10/2012 00:07 Alex de Joode said the following:
> Updated two 9.1-RC1 machines (both R210, dual GEOM MIRRORED disk)
> 
> 
> 1 went OK;
> 1 went belly up (see attachment) (after the 1st reboot)

There is no spoon^Wattachment.
Consider sending a link.

> -  Invalid format
> 
> -  BTX halted.
> 
> 
> Any ideas why ? (need to upgrade more machines without KVM access )


-- 
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-18 Thread Alex de Joode
Updated two 9.1-RC1 machines (both R210, dual GEOM MIRRORED disk)


1 went OK;
1 went belly up (see attachment) (after the 1st reboot)

-  Invalid format

-  BTX halted.


Any ideas why ? (need to upgrade more machines without KVM access )

-AJ-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:49:51 am Sami Halabi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> there's a patch in the list you mentioned.
> it should go to rc3 i guess.

No, that patch would break all other interrupt config hooks like probes for 
SATA and SCSI disks and USB disks.

Some driver's config hook is not finishing.  Each driver's hook is responsible 
for deregistering itself once it has finished it's interrupt probing which is
why it is not obvious how the list becomes empty.

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-11 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi,

there's a patch in the list you mentioned.
it should go to rc3 i guess.

Sami

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Gót András  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry for crossposting, but this would be really nice to be fixed in the
> final release. I just installed one RC2 onto a XenServer 6.1 cluster but
> cannot boot with XENHVM kernel. I started a thread on the freebsd-xen list,
> which is here: http://lists.freebsd.org/**pipermail/freebsd-xen/2012-**
> October/001374.html<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2012-October/001374.html>
>
> Regards,
> Andras
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:54:00 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> The second release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
>> available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, and
>> powerpc64.  The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message.
>> The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick
>> images are available here:
>>
>>   
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/**FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.**1/<ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/>
>>
>> (or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites).
>>
>> A third RC build has been decided on, currently scheduled for a week
>> from now.  The release builds themselves will begin about a week after
>> RC3.  The current target schedule has been updated:
>>
>>   
>> http://www.freebsd.org/**releases/9.1R/schedule.html<http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html>
>>
>> If you notice any problems you can report them through the normal Gnats
>> PR system or here on the -stable mailing list.
>>
>> There was enough "community push-back" from the decision to not export
>> the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS that the decision has been
>> reversed.  A firm decision has been made that 10.X release activity will
>> not be exported to CVS.  It hasn't been decided yet if the upcoming 8.X
>> and/or 9.X (past 9.1) release activity will be exported.  More
>> information about that will get posted as decisions get made.
>>
>> If you want to do a source-based update to an existing system using SVN
>> the branch to use is releng/9.1.  If you would like to use CVS instead
>> use RELENG_9_1.
>>
>> The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and amd64
>> systems running earlier FreeBSD releases.  Systems running 9.0-RELEASE,
>> 9.1-BETA1, or 9.1-RC1 can upgrade as follows:
>>
>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC2
>>
>> During this process, FreeBSD Update may ask the user to help by merging
>> some configuration files or by confirming that the automatically performed
>> merging was done correctly.
>>
>> # freebsd-update install
>>
>> The system must be rebooted with the newly installed kernel before
>> continuing.
>>
>> # shutdown -r now
>>
>> After rebooting, freebsd-update needs to be run again to install the new
>> userland components, and the system needs to be rebooted again:
>>
>> # freebsd-update install
>> # shutdown -r now
>>
>> Users of earlier FreeBSD releases (FreeBSD 7.X, 8.X) can also use
>> freebsd-update to upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RC2, but will be prompted to
>> rebuild all third-party applications (e.g., anything installed from the
>> ports tree) after the second invocation of "freebsd-update install", in
>> order to handle differences in the system libraries between FreeBSD 7.X
>> or FreeBSD 8.X and FreeBSD 9.X.
>>
>>
> __**_
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**stable<http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org
> "
>



-- 
Sami Halabi
Information Systems Engineer
NMS Projects Expert
FreeBSD SysAdmin Expert
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-10 Thread Gót András

Hi,

Sorry for crossposting, but this would be really nice to be fixed in 
the final release. I just installed one RC2 onto a XenServer 6.1 cluster 
but cannot boot with XENHVM kernel. I started a thread on the 
freebsd-xen list, which is here: 
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2012-October/001374.html


Regards,
Andras


On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:54:00 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:

The second release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, and
powerpc64.  The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this 
message.
The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory 
stick

images are available here:

  ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/

(or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites).

A third RC build has been decided on, currently scheduled for a week
from now.  The release builds themselves will begin about a week 
after

RC3.  The current target schedule has been updated:

  http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html

If you notice any problems you can report them through the normal 
Gnats

PR system or here on the -stable mailing list.

There was enough "community push-back" from the decision to not 
export

the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS that the decision has been
reversed.  A firm decision has been made that 10.X release activity 
will
not be exported to CVS.  It hasn't been decided yet if the upcoming 
8.X

and/or 9.X (past 9.1) release activity will be exported.  More
information about that will get posted as decisions get made.

If you want to do a source-based update to an existing system using 
SVN
the branch to use is releng/9.1.  If you would like to use CVS 
instead

use RELENG_9_1.

The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and 
amd64
systems running earlier FreeBSD releases.  Systems running 
9.0-RELEASE,

9.1-BETA1, or 9.1-RC1 can upgrade as follows:

# freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC2

During this process, FreeBSD Update may ask the user to help by 
merging
some configuration files or by confirming that the automatically 
performed

merging was done correctly.

# freebsd-update install

The system must be rebooted with the newly installed kernel before
continuing.

# shutdown -r now

After rebooting, freebsd-update needs to be run again to install the 
new

userland components, and the system needs to be rebooted again:

# freebsd-update install
# shutdown -r now

Users of earlier FreeBSD releases (FreeBSD 7.X, 8.X) can also use
freebsd-update to upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RC2, but will be prompted to
rebuild all third-party applications (e.g., anything installed from 
the
ports tree) after the second invocation of "freebsd-update install", 
in
order to handle differences in the system libraries between FreeBSD 
7.X

or FreeBSD 8.X and FreeBSD 9.X.



___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-10 Thread Ken Smith

The second release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, and
powerpc64.  The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message.
The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick
images are available here:

  ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/

(or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites).

A third RC build has been decided on, currently scheduled for a week
from now.  The release builds themselves will begin about a week after
RC3.  The current target schedule has been updated:

  http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html

If you notice any problems you can report them through the normal Gnats
PR system or here on the -stable mailing list.

There was enough "community push-back" from the decision to not export
the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS that the decision has been
reversed.  A firm decision has been made that 10.X release activity will
not be exported to CVS.  It hasn't been decided yet if the upcoming 8.X
and/or 9.X (past 9.1) release activity will be exported.  More
information about that will get posted as decisions get made.

If you want to do a source-based update to an existing system using SVN
the branch to use is releng/9.1.  If you would like to use CVS instead
use RELENG_9_1.

The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and amd64 
systems running earlier FreeBSD releases.  Systems running 9.0-RELEASE,
9.1-BETA1, or 9.1-RC1 can upgrade as follows:

# freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC2

During this process, FreeBSD Update may ask the user to help by merging 
some configuration files or by confirming that the automatically performed
merging was done correctly.

# freebsd-update install

The system must be rebooted with the newly installed kernel before 
continuing.

# shutdown -r now

After rebooting, freebsd-update needs to be run again to install the new 
userland components, and the system needs to be rebooted again:

# freebsd-update install
# shutdown -r now

Users of earlier FreeBSD releases (FreeBSD 7.X, 8.X) can also use
freebsd-update to upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RC2, but will be prompted to
rebuild all third-party applications (e.g., anything installed from the
ports tree) after the second invocation of "freebsd-update install", in
order to handle differences in the system libraries between FreeBSD 7.X
or FreeBSD 8.X and FreeBSD 9.X.

Checksums:

MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-bootonly.iso) = bacba310a6387a8d64df8178aa9d1de0
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-memstick.img) = 1e539c978e49d4115fa48851e148e156
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-disc1.iso) = e4c61498e58fec93744b248f17573bc6

MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-bootonly.iso) = 9d839532595355511b62359f02be68ad
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-memstick.img) = f44f9c00fec04c7544a401b62e653249
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-disc1.iso) = ad17598b8a1f9e048bf496ce34b6d8be

MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-bootonly.iso) = 8a70c60bea27fb81ae66e518283eec8d
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-memstick) = 0be81103f6aa4d8becba2f341370e5a2
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-release.iso) = 2546fc2d11c7b3d5031ed285146dc815

MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-bootonly.iso) = 5678929dd41181e52cd5da1389be05d1
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-memstick) = bc681cda1d4e49e0288f27bd616130b7
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-release.iso) = eb5ac93ad8befc567e03e8ce58051cdd

MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc64-bootonly.iso) = a035c65d8268e5d8b32f8d84ca266588
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc64-memstick) = b6dcfb14de1b835e582253eb179a7072
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc64-release.iso) = 9bd3bddaaab25948fea3c3957f889414

SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-bootonly.iso) = 
8cb69eedc8d2bd493b4acb6df2092865047ce4475f4142ba227b8cb4ab3754ad
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-memstick.img) = 
4d552c2f2641ddfebe158427460785d3e0b184e603ef01f433579004d26dd54c
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-amd64-disc1.iso) = 
6b874d20c909a4a53d8eaa8aa3c1316a957a27406265ca83e9399daa42271177

SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-bootonly.iso) = 
f0df7bc32ffb973f7f269c3097fd223de7f6832ee7d77aadae91e3b42de61a10
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-memstick.img) = 
d8e2a686d69c4c3cbaff8bb4e8324f9c66ad3b563bf48e163e8f91be75ebb3b4
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-i386-disc1.iso) = 
165e342d89f57bdd06f24b4f8bdc0b45b1eec4e5bbde52b6fd5dbabeae290cf6

SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-bootonly.iso) = 
c9e730b1bdc7bd9b2a51ac860456bb98c6a06cba58e3a604fcb30e2dc991731d
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-memstick) = 
df5622b66575a3bd4bf2d878569dc2b0d1b8bf5cab1596c3632f19da048aa774
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-ia64-release.iso) = 
11a48342921fbff0abb7bab0cd9b32838036dda09c0383c6fea34d679768dd49

SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-bootonly.iso) = 
b3462a7fc55adcf7e00bb3ef0d8f4a2a6c2e9b44329d4a6c823a1cf1394521ae
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-memstick) = 
6a42285f71c8359aac931c28958ade49c0677bf6a350f285646a86c02584a266
SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-RC2-powerpc-release.iso) = 
3ebb722b9a17e8facf5378cb6026670da583b2b42ba08be6d0d74e3ad658096d

SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-R

FreeBSD 9.1-RC2

2012-09-30 Thread George Kontostanos
Hi all,

I know that this question is sort of rhetoric but given the fact that
it has been over a month  since 9.1-RC1 and that we are actually
entering October in a few hours. Do we have an ETD for RC2 and can we
expect a final release a week after?

This question has mainly to do with reactions that I get from clients
that do not feel comfortable staying on a pre release version for so
long.

Thanks

-- 
George Kontostanos
---
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"