Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market!

2001-07-25 Thread Fred Gilham



Kai Torak writes:

 FreeBSD works great as a desktop O/S!? Sure you have to tweek and
 tune it to be a good server or a good desktop, but who actualy
 expects an O/S to do exactly what you want out of the box without
 having to tweek it for that job? For desktop we have all these usb
 things and stuff, I mean what more do you want? Examples of what
 exactly is wrong would probably help, but since this is just a
 great big troll I guess it has no base in reality...


A suggestion:  post your tweaks.  That might help people who want to
run FreeBSD on the desktop and stimulate discussion on what are good
optimizations for FreeBSD-STABLE.

Personally, over time I've found that the desktop is almost always
fast enough, and that responsiveness and stability are more important
than the speed of any particular operation.  At one point I was coming
in to work each morning and rebooting my system because I was
following CURRENT with SMP and it was REALLY unstable.  I didn't enjoy
the experience and even backed up to STABLE for a while even though it
didn't have SMP at the time.

The cheapest, most effective solution for speed problems these days is
almost always to buy faster hardware.

---
Fred Gilham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you
rest.  Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and
lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.  For my yoke
is easy, and my burden is light.   --Jesus of Nazareth

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market!

2001-07-25 Thread Jordan Hubbard

Again, I fail to see what this has to do with FreeBSD-stable.  This is
your second official warning.  On the next offense, you will be banned
forever from all FreeBSD mailing lists.  I don't care whether you were
responding to other people or not, you are solely responsible for your
own behavior and so far, it's not meeting even the most minimum
standards we have here.  Again, this is your second and last warning
in compliance with the mailing list charters.

- Jordan

From: Sung Nae Cho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market!
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:44:32 -0400 (EDT)

 Don't be embarrassed.  Although I'm working on Ph.D. in physics at
 Virginia Tech, I hate the f**king school.  Don't get me wrong, I like the
 physics department and folks in department.  But, rest of the school,
 I don't give f**k. Virginia Tech is the shittiest school I've ever been
 too.  This is the school full of dumb f**k Southern bitches and dorky punks,
 God only knows how they even got their jobs at Tech, full of bureaucrats who
 are only concerend with their image and putting down on Blacks and other
 minorities! This is the school still White kids make joke about Blacks
 and that happens naturally around here. Thank God at leats Physics and
 much of Engineering depts. are evenly composed of scholars from all
 over the world; and we don't tolerate such ignorance!  Now, you can have
 all the pride of this shit hole school yourself.  I don't want any of it
 and I'm not even proud to be called a Virginia Tech student.  I'm only
 here because Physics department doesn't tolerate such ignorance.  You are
 the one that's making me embarrassed by even considering me as a Virginia
 Tech student!  Please, refer me as someone from Physics department but
 don't tie me with the shit hole Virginia Tech.
 
 
 Sung N. Cho,
 Dept. of Physics,
 Virginia Polytechnic Institute  State University.
 
 
 On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Jason Andresen wrote:
 
  Sung Nae Cho wrote:
  
 
  Aarrgh!  Must...Resist...Trolling...
 
  Nuts, well I'll make this short:
 
  
   I don't know how far this have gone down the road and altered throughout
   the course.  But, I've never said desktops don't need stability.  It all
   started with some faction of FreeBSD users complaining about the default
   enable of the disk write cache for modern hard drives in FreeBSD 4.x
   series.  My original post was literally responding to them, Come on!
   This is 21st Century and hard disks are reliable and we need to take full
   advantage over those capable devices if FreeBSD's ever going to succeed in
   desktop market.  FreeBSD is no longer for server use only!  Personally,
   I've been using UDMA capable disks (and, who doesn't these days?) with all
   the DMA capabilities fully turned on and never had to compromise
   performance with stability.  If you are so worried about UDMA capable
   disks to not to work as it suppose to, why in the world are you even
   getting UDMA disk?  Jee, lets get real here.  Too many of the FreeBSD
 
  Where did this non-sequitor come from?
 
  Current state of FreeBSD:
 
  ATA disks are run at the maximum transfer rate the disk, controller, and
  cable allow.  This includes things like UDMA100/66/33.
  Write Caching is enabled by default now.
  Filesystems have the option of running Softupdates, which almost as
  fast and _MUCH_ more reliable than async.
  ATAPI devices (CDROMs mostly) do not use DMA by default because a lot
  of ATAPI devices flat out lie about what they support.  This is easily
  tunable if you are _sure_ your ATAPI devices supports DMA.  It's just
  common sense.
 
   Dept. of Physics,
   Virginia Polytechnic Institute  State University.
 
  As a Tech alumni, this embarrasses me.
 
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market!

2001-07-25 Thread j mckitrick

On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
| 
| On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Mit Rowe wrote:
|  I wouldn't use FreeBSD for a desktop if my life depended on it.
| 
| I've been using FreeBSD as desktops, both at home and on my work laptop,

I've been running it on my laptop since 3.2.  I started with Linux and
Win95, then dropped Linux for 3.2, then dropped Windows.  No complaints, no
regrets.

| (Of course, I don't make heavy use of office apps -- I tend to use irc,
| mozilla and vi+gcc mostly)

I use Applix Office, ghostview, Licq, Xemacs, Netscrape, and others



jcm
-- 
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
|   Jonathon McKitrick  ~ |
| I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself. |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD ROCKs! (was Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market!)

2001-07-25 Thread j mckitrick


The convincer for me was Wes Peters' 'Daemon's Advocate' article.  He even
personally responded to some of my questions.  He pointed out that many of
the same factors that make a good server, make a good workstation.  

The article was May 99, BTW.  Anyway, that convinced me to give it a try,
and I've never looked back.  Is it as bleeding edge as Linux?  No, but my
Linux system became unmaintainable and incoherent very quickly.
Interestingly, a problem with unmounting CDroms under Mandrake hosed my
filesystem twice in a row, and that was it... I wanted the vaunted FreeBSD
stability.

That fast, async filesystem wasn't much good when I lost data.  That's
funny.  I could have sworn only servers care about reliability and
stability, not desktops 

jcm
-- 
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
|   Jonathon McKitrick  ~ |
| I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself. |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message