Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
John Pettitt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? John i'm using the same driver and i've already seen the message a few times. some time (a few months?) ago, though, not recently. i wonder what it might be.. martin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good, stable gigabit nic?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? John -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDR2FnaVyA7PElsKkRA+IaAJ9o1AleKkLm/3Dlu+tQtu970bSvOgCfXaFb zKoGLZlkGFl2UgB5/UjZB3g= =Si7v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:04:23PM -0700, John Pettitt wrote: My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? Cards using the RealTek 8169S chipset are cheap (~10 Euro) and are working without a problem here. -- Markus ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? Cards using the RealTek 8169S chipset are cheap (~10 Euro) and are working without a problem here. Sorry, but it seems there is some problem with this one. You can check the PR database for `if_re' and found kern/68514 or kern/84584. In particular, i want to point you to mine: kern/80005. This problem is encountered from ~2 year now and was reported to me, privately, by one other user last week. -- -jpeg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote: My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? The Intel gigabit cards are quite good, 'man em' for details. As a second choice, i would look in to a Broadcom based card, 'man bge' for that one. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
We have had problems with BGE, but have had good luck with intel FXP and EMO, but they are expensive. -naseem -Original Message- From: Mike Jakubik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat Oct 08 08:31:46 2005 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: John Pettitt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Markus Trippelsdorf Subject:Re: Good, stable gigabit nic? On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote: My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? The Intel gigabit cards are quite good, 'man em' for details. As a second choice, i would look in to a Broadcom based card, 'man bge' for that one. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
On Sat, October 8, 2005 1:13 pm, Naseem A. Choudhury wrote: We have had problems with BGE, but have had good luck with intel FXP and EMO, but they are expensive. You get what you pay for. P.S. Please don't top post on a mailing list. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for you? I have machines with Tigon II (ti), Marvell 88E8001 (sk), i82540 (em), RTL8169 (re), and BCM5750 (bge) interfaces. The only ones I've ever had problems with were the Tigon and Marvell, and the latter was fixed nearly a year ago. All except the Tigon and Broadcom are running under 5-STABLE; the Broadcom is running 6.0b5. I can't comment on the Level I, Nominal Semidestructor, or VIA chips as I've never seen any. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman| As the Constitution endures, persons in every [EMAIL PROTECTED] | generation can invoke its principles in their own Opinions not those| search for greater freedom. of MIT or CSAIL. | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
