MFC request for 7.3-RELEASE: ASIX AX88172A USB Ethernet

2010-02-12 Thread Brett Glass
Please MFC support for ASIX AX88172A USB Ethernet to 7.3-RELEASE;
see

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140923

for information. Note that the AX88172 driver works with the
newer AX88172A chip, which has replaced it; the system simply needs
to be told that it does.

--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Modest MFC request: src/Makefile.inc1, rev. 1.614 (SVN rev 184860)

2008-11-20 Thread David Wolfskill
I'm writing to encourage an MFC for src/Makefile.inc1, rev. 1.614.

I tested it for the committer.  :-}  And if we're to make use of
amd64 arch "build" machines at $WORK, we'll need that change.
(Symptoms prior to the commit are that 32-bit executables that use
crypto libraries will fail to run because the 32-bit crypto libraries
won't be found.  And since the version of CVS that our developers use
is linked against crypto libraries (as that's the default), that's just
one example of a fairly basic bit of infrastructure that would be
broken.)

It's been in CURRENT for over a week --and as obrien@ noted, we've been
building the libraries all along; the install32 target just didn't
include them, so we weren't installing them.

Please?  Thanks!

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.


pgpb4lOJxIP9r.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: MFC Request

2008-11-13 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:38:30PM +, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
>> Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a 
>> and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
>> 
> 
> There's an AS lookup capable traceroute in ports:
>/usr/ports/net/ntraceroute
> 
> is this insufficient for your needs?

Also note that Rui has completed the traceroute MFC for 7.1
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC Request

2008-11-13 Thread Bruce Simpson

Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have 
-a and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)




There's an AS lookup capable traceroute in ports:
   /usr/ports/net/ntraceroute

is this insufficient for your needs?

thanks
BMS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC Request

2008-11-11 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:06 -0200, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a 

I second that request.  I'm prepared to bribe someone as well.

~BAS

> and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
> 
-- 
Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.




IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended 
recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an 
intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


MFC Request

2008-11-11 Thread Patrick Tracanelli
Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a 
and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)


--
Patrick Tracanelli

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread mjacob



On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joao Barros wrote:



There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...

It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) )


You're right, I missed that detail :)
You can always ask the "responsible" guy what he did, but right now
I'd say you have a freebie ;)




Use the attached to see if the attached disks are in fact paths to the 
same device based upon serial ##!/bin/sh
#
# This script gets a list of da devices and Vital Product Data Serial numbers.
#
# It checks for same devices by matching serial number *and* logical unit
#
camcontrol devl|sed -e 's/^.*lun.//' -e 's/(//' -e 's/)//' -e 's/,/ /'|grep da|\
 sed -e 's/pass.* //' -e 's/pass.*$//' | while read lun disk
do
  serno=`camcontrol inquiry ${disk} -S`
  if [ X"${serno}" != X ]
  then
echo "${disk} ${lun} ${serno}" >>/tmp/t$$
echo ${lun}"."${serno} >> /tmp/y$$
  fi
done
cat /tmp/y$$ | while read serno_lun_pair
do
  grep $serno_lun_pair /tmp/t$$ > /tmp/a$$
  nmatch=`cat /tmp/a$$ |wc -l|sed 's/ //g'`
  if [ $nmatch -lt 2 ]
  then
continue
  fi
  echo "Potential Same Devices:"
  cat /tmp/a$$ | awk ' { printf "\t%s (lun %s)\t%s\n", $1, $2, $3 }'
  cat /tmp/t$$ | grep -v $serno_lun_pair > /tmp/d$$
  mv /tmp/d$$ /tmp/t$$
done
rm -f /tmp/t$$ /tmp/y$$ /tmp/a$$
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread mjacob


The GEOM multipath code hasn't been MFC'd yet.


On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:


Joao Barros wrote:

On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this
correct? I can write to both drives.


I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception.
I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better
explanation ;)


I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it)
because both disks are atached to isp0:

da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0

There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...

It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) )



___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread Joao Barros

On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
>> should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this
>> correct? I can write to both drives.
>
> I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception.
> I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better
> explanation ;)

I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it)
because both disks are atached to isp0:

da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0

There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...

It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) )


You're right, I missed that detail :)
You can always ask the "responsible" guy what he did, but right now
I'd say you have a freebie ;)


--
Joao Barros
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread Joao Barros

On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this
correct? I can write to both drives.


I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception.
I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better explanation ;)

--
Joao Barros
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread Ivan Voras
Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
>> should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this
>> correct? I can write to both drives.
> 
> I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception.
> I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better
> explanation ;)

I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it)
because both disks are atached to isp0:

da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0

There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...

It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) )



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread Alex Dupre

Ivan Voras ha scritto:

I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable


It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)


My card identifies itself as 2462s, in an IBM blade.


Nobody tested the new code with a 246x card, but probably is the same as 
242x (tested).


--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller

2007-03-09 Thread Ivan Voras
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Ivan Voras ha scritto:
>> I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable
> 
> It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)

That was fast :)

I've cvsupped before trying to get the blade to work (needed SerDes
support for bce cards) but wow, it has been almost three days now :(
time flies...

I'll try it now and report how it's doing.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


MFC Request: kern/100958?

2007-01-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Greetings,
Can we get kern/100958 MFC'd?  It's been in -CURRENT since September,
and fixes a problem for me with my laptop getting the AGPGART device
attached.

Thanks!

-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC Request: linux_gettid from 6-CURRENT to 5-STABLE

2005-05-20 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/20/05, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additionally these changes would allow VMware 4 to function.  Could we
> get a MFC of the 6-CURRENT linux emulator code to 5-STABLE, or at a
> minimum the following versions:
> 

Also need to bump the OSVERSION on 5-STABLE when commited, so the
VMware ports can detect if a patch to the kernel is needed or not.

> I have attached 2 files:
>linux.gettid-freebsd4-20050520.diff.gz
>linux.gettid-freebsd6-20040906.diff.gz

If these files have been stripped from the list, let me know and I'll
send them directly to those who are interested.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


MFC Request: linux_gettid from 6-CURRENT to 5-STABLE

2005-05-20 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sep 6 2004 several new syscalls were added to the linux emulator
code.  This was done to get TransGaming's winex (partially) working. 
Additionally these changes would allow VMware 4 to function.  Could we
get a MFC of the 6-CURRENT linux emulator code to 5-STABLE, or at a
minimum the following versions:

src/sys/i386/linux/linux_machdep.c 1.44
src/sys/i386/linux/linux_proto.h 1.61
src/sys/i386/linux/linux_syscall.h 1.55
src/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysent.c 1.62
src/sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master 1.58

I have attached 2 files:
linux.gettid-freebsd4-20050520.diff.gz
- not tested, needs someone to check if it will work on 4-STABLE

linux.gettid-freebsd6-20040906.diff.gz
- diff between the above linux emu files and there previous versions
- minus $FreeBSD$ ids
- should work on FreeBSD 5-STABLE and
  6-CURRENT (OSVERSION < 63)

Also need a place to host the above kernel patch files.

I'm currently looking into creating the VMware 4 & 5 Host OS ports. I
am using orlando's VMware 4 patch to vmmon and the VMware 3 vmnet
patch for the VMware 4 port.

Scot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: MFC request (was: What ??)

2001-02-25 Thread Warner Losh

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: 
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: > : From today's -CURRENT dmesg:
: > : 
: > : ---===>  Happy Birthday Peter!!!   <===---
: > : 
: > : Can this please be MFCed for 4.3-RELEASE?
: > 
: > Once it has been in FreeBSD -current for about a week, we'll consider
: > merging back into stable.  Thanks for your request :-)
: 
: but in one week, It will be too late, no ? ;^)

It may or may not make 4.3 release.  We don't want to rush things for
such an important change.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: MFC request (was: What ??)

2001-02-25 Thread Cyrille Lefevre

Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : From today's -CURRENT dmesg:
> : 
> : ---===>  Happy Birthday Peter!!!   <===---
> : 
> : Can this please be MFCed for 4.3-RELEASE?
> 
> Once it has been in FreeBSD -current for about a week, we'll consider
> merging back into stable.  Thanks for your request :-)

but in one week, It will be too late, no ? ;^)

Cyrille.
--
home: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   UNIX is user-friendly; it's just particular
work: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   about who it chooses to be friends with.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message