Re: Old version of bison
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote: > Ports cvsup'ed yesterday, > > $ cat /usr/ports/devel/bison/Makefile > {snip} > PORTNAME= bison > PORTVERSION=1.75 > PORTREVISION= 2 > {snip} > > Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with this version when > 1.875 was released 2 years ago almost to the day? Yes, the bison developers apparently don't understand why a widely-used build tool should need to remain backwards-compatible with itself (see also: autoconf, automake developers). Kris pgpYhZH5kinPh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Old version of bison
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 04:13 am, Godwin Stewart wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:55:42 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you have an uptodate port system you will find > > > > Port: bison-1.875_4 > > Path: /usr/ports/devel/bison1875 > > Indeed. > > That'll teach me to hit [tab] twice after typing > /usr/ports/devel/bison > What I find handy is a perl script called portsearch. It is located in ports/Tools/scripts/ I moved it into a directory in my path. Then, I added an alias search'portsearch -n $1' You can do interesting things like search ^bison Where the port name begins with bison. There are a number of other interesting options. They are covered in a README. Make search does something similar but the output from portsearch is cleaner. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Old version of bison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:55:42 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have an uptodate port system you will find > > Port: bison-1.875_4 > Path: /usr/ports/devel/bison1875 Indeed. That'll teach me to hit [tab] twice after typing /usr/ports/devel/bison Thanks. - -- G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QUARK: The sound made by a well-bred duck: -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2ohlK5oiGLo9AcYRAvn+AKCnX5a9qhC7ywR0KEwGZ3KwIzOPdQCfRH3n s6Uh0PYkD0QrfFmHjR4ZCVU= =2EKn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Old version of bison
Godwin Stewart wrote: > Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with > this version when 1.875 was released 2 years ago almost to > the day? >From the first commit comment of devel/bison1875: Some grammars require the new version of Bison (such as PostgreSQL), however the new bison also breaks many many ports. Compromise with a new port. Installs as bison and _not_ bison1875 and should be mutually exclusive to the main bison port. Hopefully the bison authors will clean up their product and this port can disappear when the base bison port is updated in the future or enough ports are updated to work with newer versions of bison. http://www.freshports.org/devel/bison1875/ Regards BjÃrn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Old version of bison
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 03:27 am, Godwin Stewart wrote: > Ports cvsup'ed yesterday, > > $ cat /usr/ports/devel/bison/Makefile > {snip} > PORTNAME= bison > PORTVERSION=1.75 > PORTREVISION= 2 > {snip} > > Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with this > version when 1.875 was released 2 years ago almost to the day? If you have an uptodate port system you will find Port: bison-1.875_4 Path: /usr/ports/devel/bison1875 Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Old version of bison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ports cvsup'ed yesterday, $ cat /usr/ports/devel/bison/Makefile {snip} PORTNAME= bison PORTVERSION=1.75 PORTREVISION= 2 {snip} Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with this version when 1.875 was released 2 years ago almost to the day? - -- G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Always the dullness of the fool is the whetstone of the wits. -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2n2kK5oiGLo9AcYRAvP1AJ94si7rV5CgrmHyudIprYhnHBNyMQCeN5SI C62CGyfi6Fvg+xrZeuiihyM= =C/hS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"