On Wednesday 15 January 2003 03:40 pm, Stephen Hilton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:37:13 -0800
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 January 2003 11:46 am, Stephen Hilton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:54:14 -0800
> > >
> > > "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:12:35 +0100
> > > > > From: Pierrick Brossin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > Belphoebe Niressi wrote:
> >
> > <snip unrelated messages>
> >
> > > Is the "portsdb -Uu" working properly now? I have been using:
> > >
> > > #> cd /usr/ports
> > > #> rm INDEX*
> > > #> make index
> > > #> pkgdb -Fv
> > > #> portsdb -u
> >
> > I think they are both broken in some respect right now because what
> > I am seeing is the following using "make index" and then run
> > "portsdb -u"
> >
> > <many error messages>
> > /man7/des_modes.7.gz /nonexistentlocal/man/""/man7/Modes.7.gz
> > /nonexistentlocal/man/""/man7/des_modes.7.gz
> > /nonexistentlocal/man/""/man7/of.7.gz | /usr/bin/awk '{for (i=2;have
> > i<=NF; i+=2) print $i}'" returned non-zero status
> > Done.
> >
> > [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb1_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 8009
> > port entries found
> > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000..
> >.......6000.........7000.........8000 ..... done]
> >
> > Running "portsdb -Uu I get
> >
> > <lots of error messages>
> > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-DNS
> > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-DNS
> > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0
> > done
> > ruby# portsdb -u
> > [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb1_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 8002
> > port entries found
> > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000..
> >.......6000.........7000.........8000 ..... done]
> >
> > There are 7 ports that portsdb -U can't account for.
>
> Regarding this error:
> "Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0"
> is this an "inside joke" or just a real tough problem to
> fix? been seeing this error for ages (I would fix this if
> I could, but I couldn't code myself out of a brown paper
> bag :-)
I don't either. I think Kris made a comment on one of them a while back
about the index building process not being able to detect that they
were different.
>
> > I also don't see why you are doing more than
> >
> > cd /usr/ports
> > make indextwice
> > portsdb -u
>
> Thanks for the correction Kent, I was doing a couple of unnecessary
> steps. I would usually rm my /usr/ports/INDEX /usr/ports/INDEX.db and
> /usr/ports/INDEX.txt files because they were going to be recreated
> anyways (I do refuse the INDEX file when cvsuping to save bandwidth).
>
> > Everything else is something I would do if your installed based
> > gets messed up. For example, portsdb -Fv doesn't have anything to
> > do with making your INDEX* files. When you run "make index", it
> > always wipes INDEX.
>
> I never referenced the command "portsdb -Fv" I said "pkgdb -Fv",
> and I picked up this step from a message thread started by Stacey
> Roberts in December 2002 that you had responded to, so I assumed
> (ya I know) that this was OK or even a "good thing" to do during
> the INDEX's generation process.they are
I was looking at something else and missed that part. I maintain I run
"kent" because I have so many aliases and shell scripts that do most of
the repetitive things. I also try to keep things clean. I used to have
a script that did everything from cvsup to installworld and I only had
to run mergemaster when it finished. Now, I split them up into tasks
that have a single purpose. I got used to doing this during my
programming days. You didn't change or add many features before you
started debugging what you had done. If you stepped on something you
didn't know which change had done it. So, my update ports script only
cvsup updates the port structure and recreates my INDEX files. Running
pkgdb violates my single purpose rule. Since you really need to update
your INDEX files everytime you cvsup ports-all, rebuilding the INDEX
files is part of my port cvsup update script.
>
> As I understand "pkgdb -Fv" it is an interactive check/repair of
> your installed ports/packages as referenced by the /var/db/pkg
> entries (package registry database) and _Yes_ it has no bearing on
> generation of the INDEX/db files.
I have done this a couple of times in near past. I may get it right yet.
When I see the message, I cut and paste it. I don't think I have ever
typed "pkgdb -F" from scratch. When I am looking at something in the
vicinity of portsdb, I naturally type portsdb instead of pkgdb. I don't
even notice that I have done it and I proof read everything 2 or 3
times before I send it.
>
> Thanks again Kent for your willingness to share your expertise
> and all the great pointers and background information I pick up
> just reading yours and others contributions to the mailing lists.
Everyone zeroes in on different specific's. I think it depends on what
you have been bitten by. The buildworld, build[install]kernel,
installworld got me during the update from 4.0 to 4.1. I was used to
doing a make world and then do the kernel. I couldn't do a "make world"
now if I wanted to. In addition, if you have interpreted something
differently, you are sure to have some one point that out. The other
cool part of the lists is that you don't know what part of the world is
going to provide the person that answers your question.
Kent
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen Hilton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
