Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-14 Thread Eirik Øverby


On Dec 6, 2005, at 03:20 , Joshua Coombs wrote:


#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of  
avoiding memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my  
386, on which any little boost is significant. : )


Hoi,
let me know how you got 6.0 running on i386 .. It sounds like the  
perfect way to spend some of the holidays ;) I've heard it won't run  
on a plain i386 out-of-the-box, what did you do to convince it to run?


/Eirik



Joshua Coombs

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"






___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> 
> "Igor Robul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> >>#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
> >>
> >>What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of 
> >>avoiding
> >>memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on
> >>which any little boost is significant. : )
> >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
> >
> >So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.
> 
> Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
> eliminate that issue.
> 
> What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are 
> considered stable or not.

Yes.

Kris


pgpqu12iIuX1R.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-06 Thread Joshua Coombs


"Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Joshua Coombs wrote:

Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
eliminate that issue.


So you were not truthful about running a 386...


No, I'm running on a 386.  It's a bodged, banged up pile, but it's a 
386.  FreeBSD 6 can infact run on a subset of 386 hardware with the 
right massaging.


What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets 
are considered stable or not.


Works for me[tm].


Cool, I'll have to give it a go then.

Joshua Coombs 



___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-06 Thread Vivek Khera


On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Joshua Coombs wrote:

Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to  
eliminate that issue.


So you were not truthful about running a 386...

What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets  
are considered stable or not.


Works for me[tm].

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-06 Thread Joshua Coombs


"Igor Robul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:

#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of 
avoiding

memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on
which any little boost is significant. : )

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL

So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.


Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
eliminate that issue.


What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are 
considered stable or not.


Joshua Coombs


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

2005-12-05 Thread Igor Robul
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> #optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
> 
> What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of avoiding 
> memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on 
> which any little boost is significant. : )
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL

So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"