Re: netstat -m broken.

2005-04-11 Thread Maxim Konovalov 
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, 12:07-0400, David Gilbert wrote:

 I'm runing 5.4-STABLE on an dual processor amd64.  I'm using the
 network pretty heavily (dual GigE interfaces doing 300 megabit each)
 and my netstat -m is giving odd results:

FAQ.  Documented in 5.3 errata:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html

-- 
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: netstat -m broken.

2005-04-11 Thread Max Laier 
On Monday 11 April 2005 18:42, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, 12:07-0400, David Gilbert wrote:
  I'm runing 5.4-STABLE on an dual processor amd64.  I'm using the
  network pretty heavily (dual GigE interfaces doing 300 megabit each)
  and my netstat -m is giving odd results:

 FAQ.  Documented in 5.3 errata:
 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html

Maybe we should add that:
$vmstat -z | grep Mbuf
gives an idea of the actual memory usage for mbufs.

-- 
/\  Best regards,  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /  Max Laier  | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Against HTML Mail and News


pgpqm9vSn0fiU.pgp
Description: PGP signature