XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?

2001-03-09 Thread Irvine Short

XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?

Anyone know if this will be the case?

Cheers,

-- 

Irvine Short

Sys Admin
SANBI, University of the Western Cape, South Africa
http://www.sanbi.ac.za 
tel: +27-21-959 3645
fax: +27-21-959 2512
cel: +27-82-494 3828

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?

2001-03-09 Thread Thomas Quinot

Le 2001-03-09, Irvine Short crivait :

 XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?
 Anyone know if this will be the case?

The XFree 4 port already builds and works flawlessly on 4.2-STABLE.

Thomas.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?

2001-03-09 Thread Gordon Tetlow

On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:

 Nope.  When XFree86 4.x:

a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6

b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
   (3dfx sucks so much on both that it's not an issue).

c) Doesn't have a configuration tool which confuses new users
   even more than the old configuration tool did.

You forgot one (that happens for me)
d) Doesn't take half the CPU while sitting idle.

But then again, I suspect it has something to do with the fact I'm running
a dual head.

-gordon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?

2001-03-09 Thread Kent Stewart



Gordon Tetlow wrote:
 
 On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
 
  Nope.  When XFree86 4.x:
 
 a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6
 
 b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
(3dfx sucks so much on both that it's not an issue).
 
 c) Doesn't have a configuration tool which confuses new users
even more than the old configuration tool did.
 
 You forgot one (that happens for me)
 d) Doesn't take half the CPU while sitting idle.
 
 But then again, I suspect it has something to do with the fact I'm running
 a dual head.

I had to chuckle at this point. I'm running 3.3.6 and KDE-2.1 on a
dual 866 coppermine system. On it, kicker has 95% of the second cpu
full time. I wonder what is taking half of your system/

Kent
 
 -gordon
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message