Re: cvsup2
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:37, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On Thursday 2004 January 22 12:50, Craig Boston wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:10 pm, Will Andrews wrote: So use another one? Like maybe cvsup12.freebsd.org? :) Sssshhh!!! Don't tell anybody about cvsup12... I like it being really really _FAST_ ;-) I personally use cvsup11 now. I think I switched several times after cvsup2 started reaching capacity some months ago. This may be a silly question, but why doesn't cvsup.freebsd.org list all of the others in a round-robin setup? That way people can still use their preferred servers directly (e.g. cvsup11.), yet load can be distributed amongst all of them by just using cvsup.freebsd.org. Regards, Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: cvsup2
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: Thanks for the info. Cvsup2 was my fastest link :) You can use the fastest_cvsup port to find a replacement in the meantime. This is most excellent because my cable company won't allow pinging. Is there something similar for finding the fastest ftp mirror? Thanks, Pete... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup2
On Thursday 22 January 2004 01:34 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: Thanks for the info. Cvsup2 was my fastest link :) You can use the fastest_cvsup port to find a replacement in the meantime. But fastest in the fastest_cvsup sense doesn't accurately represent the shortest cvsup session. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
