fat32 slower than dogshit?

[Lamont Granquist]

Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is
in the first place.  But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition
using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated
4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an
untar on a UFS partition.  Now i know fat32 is supposed to be slower than
UFS, but this seems a little bit rediculous.  Does this sound like a known
problem?  If someone wants more information I can probably dig down and
get it if I know what you want...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: fat32 slower than dogshit?

[Donn Miller]

Lamont Granquist wrote:
 
 Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is
 in the first place.  But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition
 using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated
 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an
 untar on a UFS partition.

That sounds about right.  This is one of many reasons I don't run WinDOS
anymore.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message