Re: new desktop box

2012-07-02 Thread Zoran Kolic
 I run an 8120, it is a bulldozer however. I overclock it by adjusting
 the multiplier in the bios. Stock freq is 3.1GHZ and I run it at 4.2 GHz
 with an increase in Vcore of only 0.125V cooling with air. Solid as a
 rock.

How about heating?

 - buildworld runs about 20min.
 - buildkernel runs about 6min.

That is what matters.   :)

Best regards

Zoran

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-07-02 Thread Warren Block

On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Zoran Kolic wrote:


I run an 8120, it is a bulldozer however. I overclock it by adjusting
the multiplier in the bios. Stock freq is 3.1GHZ and I run it at 4.2 GHz
with an increase in Vcore of only 0.125V cooling with air. Solid as a
rock.


How about heating?


- buildworld runs about 20min.
- buildkernel runs about 6min.


That is what matters.   :)


If you use gcc, devel/ccache can improve that a lot.  ccache also works 
with clang, but does not seem very effective.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-29 Thread Zoran Kolic
 I have a GT430 installed on my machine,  but I think GT520 will
 use less power,  from specification:
 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-520/specifications
 It only needs 29W while GT430 needs 49W.
 NVIDIA also provides their native driver for FreeBSD.

There is fanless GT520 card, not expensive. I hope it will work
with nv. No real need for something more than basic graphics.

What I still cannot decide is what cpu to get. I read reviews for
bulldozer and find nothing thrilling. Guys are mostly gamers. On
the other side, whatever i buy, gonna suffice. How about fx 8120 ?
I like to have multicore (is there one core nowadays), but cold.
Seems that I cannot wait for next generation to show up.
Best regards

   Zoran

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-29 Thread Zoran Kolic
 Do not get a Radeon newer than the 4000-series, the drivers are not 
 available in FreeBSD at present.  The 4650 has worked well for me.

I'm not picky. In old node I have/had geforce 6200, which is pretty
old. Works fine for non-demanding user. It also has no fan.
As I said, my only concern at the moment is what cpu I should choose.
I found posts of non working amdtemp on bulldozer. Code from the head
had to be compiled for it to work. Gamers overclock and get high
temperatures. If someone has fx cpu (especially 8120), I'd like to
hear how it behaves.
Best regards

 Zoran

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-29 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Thursday, June 28, 2012 09:00:56 PM Zoran Kolic wrote:
 Thanks all for reply!
 
  The real question is which video card do you want to use?
 
 Since I'm not gamer nor do 3d, some silent card will suffice.
 There are nvidia gp520 and radeon 6450, both with no fan.
 Also, I always enable powerd and dynamically lower freq to the
 least I could. More I read, less I know, regarding that future
 cpu. What about amd fx8120 ? Nex gen will come at Q3, maybe.

I am currently also considering an eight core AMD. I have a Athlon X4 620 and I 
am perfectly happy with it.

 Next decision might be ssd, instead of hdd. Best reviews are
 for samsung 830 (of wich 64gb are fine in my case).
 I plan to install from usb stick and avoid dvd-cd. Also, cannot

This is what I do since 8.0.

Erich
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-28 Thread Zoran Kolic
Thanks all for reply!

 The real question is which video card do you want to use?

Since I'm not gamer nor do 3d, some silent card will suffice.
There are nvidia gp520 and radeon 6450, both with no fan.
Also, I always enable powerd and dynamically lower freq to the
least I could. More I read, less I know, regarding that future
cpu. What about amd fx8120 ? Nex gen will come at Q3, maybe.
Next decision might be ssd, instead of hdd. Best reviews are
for samsung 830 (of wich 64gb are fine in my case).
I plan to install from usb stick and avoid dvd-cd. Also, cannot
make into what mobo should fit, but stay out of expensive field.
Probably intel ethernet if possible, but it is not available
in most data I read.
Once more, thank you all for fast respond.

   Zoran

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-28 Thread Warren Block

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Zoran Kolic wrote:


Thanks all for reply!


The real question is which video card do you want to use?


Since I'm not gamer nor do 3d, some silent card will suffice.
There are nvidia gp520 and radeon 6450, both with no fan.


Do not get a Radeon newer than the 4000-series, the drivers are not 
available in FreeBSD at present.  The 4650 has worked well for me.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-28 Thread David Xu

On 2012/06/28 22:00, Zoran Kolic wrote:

Thanks all for reply!


The real question is which video card do you want to use?

Since I'm not gamer nor do 3d, some silent card will suffice.
There are nvidia gp520 and radeon 6450, both with no fan.
Also, I always enable powerd and dynamically lower freq to the
least I could. More I read, less I know, regarding that future
cpu. What about amd fx8120 ? Nex gen will come at Q3, maybe.
Next decision might be ssd, instead of hdd. Best reviews are
for samsung 830 (of wich 64gb are fine in my case).
I plan to install from usb stick and avoid dvd-cd. Also, cannot
make into what mobo should fit, but stay out of expensive field.
Probably intel ethernet if possible, but it is not available
in most data I read.
Once more, thank you all for fast respond.

Zoran




I have a GT430 installed on my machine,  but I think GT520 will
use less power,  from specification:
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-520/specifications
It only needs 29W while GT430 needs 49W.
NVIDIA also provides their native driver for FreeBSD.

Regards,
David Xu

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


new desktop box

2012-06-27 Thread Zoran Kolic
Dear list!
This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's own sake.
After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box.
Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
the correct way to go. For long time I use AMD and would like to
have another one, but would listen to advice, if proves better
to have intel. What are features I'd like:
- to be silent and cold
- to stay on not-expensive side
Finally, questions.
Phenom II 1100 or something else?
Mobo for said cpu with eth, well working with freebsd?
Graphical card, silent, that would work with amd64, branch 9?
No games, nothing fancy. To last next few years. I plan to com-
pile kernel or two. Half of usage is in console, startx then.
I will give additional information for my taste, if needed.
Best regards

   Zoran

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-27 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:

 Dear list!
 This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's own sake.
 After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box.
 Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
 the correct way to go. For long time I use AMD and would like to
 have another one, but would listen to advice, if proves better
 to have intel. What are features I'd like:
 - to be silent and cold
 - to stay on not-expensive side
 Finally, questions.
 Phenom II 1100 or something else?
 Mobo for said cpu with eth, well working with freebsd?
 Graphical card, silent, that would work with amd64, branch 9?
 No games, nothing fancy. To last next few years. I plan to com-
 pile kernel or two. Half of usage is in console, startx then.
 I will give additional information for my taste, if needed.
 Best regards

   Zoran

 You did not specify what expensive is to you, nor if you want prebuilt or
if you want to assemble it yourself.

I'd go with Intel today. We just got Dell Vostro 460 desktops, with Intel
core i5-2400 cpu with integrated graphics. Works really good, almost quiet.

You would need to go with 9-stable and use new xorg though, so once X is
started, you would lose console.

The only bad thing is perhaps the ethernet, it's some lousy
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller

If you want a few hdds the chassi is not that good.

Regards
Andreas
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-27 Thread Robert Comstock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 6/27/2012 10:37 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
 Dear list! This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's 
 own sake. After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box. 
 Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
 the correct way to go. For long time I use AMD and would like to
 have another one, but would listen to advice, if proves better to
 have intel. What are features I'd like: - to be silent and cold -
 to stay on not-expensive side Finally, questions. Phenom II 1100
 or something else? Mobo for said cpu with eth, well working with 
 freebsd? Graphical card, silent, that would work with amd64,
 branch 9? No games, nothing fancy. To last next few years. I plan
 to com- pile kernel or two. Half of usage is in console, startx
 then. I will give additional information for my taste, if needed.
 Best regards
 
 Zoran
 
 ___ 
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To 
 unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

For me I have had more problems with cheap (even expensive) mobo's
than with either CPU type.  I like the i5 offering where the CPU can
spike one core clock up to speed things up.  Seems like the best of
both worlds, when you need multiprocessor speed you have it, when one
process needs more it can also have it.  As far as silent it has been
all about fan choice.  I custom build all mine so I can pick and
choose the features I want in case/fans/etc.

Thanks,

Robert


- -- 
Robert Comstock

Comstock RD, Inc.
Lead Engineer

Phone: 208-652-0145
Cell: 208-360-0627
Email: rob...@comstockrd.com


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP6z5KAAoJELeYg2LwVZsKTikIAJADQeuVnicpwDbMhrc/XgZM
Q7BfjDZQGnJSRHm+xXSnR2Cq9c2sraubbqDJ92zZHYsNS68cq0yGJ0aA/+DTExSR
z7zTEdodU4i3D9ljeBBB7BtZlEeRaSowLKKZY73Psfoun0ZyxZ/fxyEXHgQZy92T
6GMNf9rhTG3OtEUlc90Oq5UvFB2g6nKZ/LphMEFgSaVjlf5d6YeprAe/6V5bamWY
5/+lprzYTF3XbqmGB8/c5i4uVuevhdK0XnH587WBi3NsN3zZPOxF2e9TgTVx4kjQ
V7eZc0uzxuWpYX0zqtJL85uV70lVN3x+S9fmYwYW3Qf0erdNJi+ii4T6Z0Tj+ao=
=4q6e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-27 Thread Lucas Holt
AMD and Intel both have good CPU offerings. Both have a turbo feature to 
improve single core workloads.

The real question is which video card do you want to use? Both have integrated 
solutions now or you could pick a discrete card. I personally go amd but buy 
nvidia cards as there are binary drivers. Amd's newer cards are not supported 
by x11 well under bsd. If you go with an on CPU gpu (APU) this is an intel only 
scenario. 

Amd chips are cheaper but you need a video card too. 
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: new desktop box

2012-06-27 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Lucas Holt wrote:


AMD and Intel both have good CPU offerings. Both have a turbo feature to 
improve single core workloads.

The real question is which video card do you want to use? Both have integrated 
solutions now or you could pick a discrete card. I personally go amd but buy 
nvidia cards as there are binary drivers. Amd's newer cards are not supported 
by x11 well under bsd. If you go with an on CPU gpu (APU) this is an intel only 
scenario.

Amd chips are cheaper but you need a video card too. 
___


The Core i5 processors cost more (sometimes a lot more), but dominate 
AMD in benchmarks.  FreeBSD also has/will have support for the open 
Intel video driver.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org