Re: Symbol/library versioning ...
On 11/15/16 11:24, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:59:57AM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: >> ... is a topic I just marginally understand. But pkg 1.9.3 fails >> on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p35 because /lib/libc.so.7 contains no >> definition for "openat", though /lib/libc.so.7 on 10.3-RELEASE-p11 >> does define it. I confess to being baffled. How is this supposed >> to work? 10.1-RELEASE is still supported, right?-- George > > Let me guess. You are trying to run a pkg binary, built on 10.3 system, > on the 10.1 system, do you ? If yes, this is not supported and often > breaks. > _[...] ... oops ... that's exactly what I did. Sorry for the noise. -- George ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Symbol/library versioning ...
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:59:57AM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: > ... is a topic I just marginally understand. But pkg 1.9.3 fails > on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p35 because /lib/libc.so.7 contains no > definition for "openat", though /lib/libc.so.7 on 10.3-RELEASE-p11 > does define it. I confess to being baffled. How is this supposed > to work? 10.1-RELEASE is still supported, right?-- George Let me guess. You are trying to run a pkg binary, built on 10.3 system, on the 10.1 system, do you ? If yes, this is not supported and often breaks. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Symbol/library versioning ...
... is a topic I just marginally understand. But pkg 1.9.3 fails on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p35 because /lib/libc.so.7 contains no definition for "openat", though /lib/libc.so.7 on 10.3-RELEASE-p11 does define it. I confess to being baffled. How is this supposed to work? 10.1-RELEASE is still supported, right?-- George ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: versioning
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Adam Weinberger wrote: AW> you can likely deduce some answers from: AW> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html AW> AW> 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about. AW> then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots AW> that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels comfortable AW> calling 4.7-RELEASE. Yeah, this is true, except the following... AW> so, as you track RELENG_4, you will obtain each tag point sequentially. AW> if you cvsup your sources every day, you will know when RC2 is available AW> because "uname -a" will show 4.7-RC2. Which is not. uname of the system is determined by /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.h; -RC[n] are never been CVS tags, they are specifically set on machines which build release candidates. Summarizing: if you follow sources via cvs/cvsup/other way, you'd never got -RCn. You got, for last month, 4.6-STABLE, then 4.7-PRERELEASE, then 4.7-RC (without numbers), then, finally, 4.7-STABLE. However, you'd *never* got 4.7-RELEASE, because this specific tag will be set on a security branch named RELENG_4_7 (which is created shortly before actual release). Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: versioning
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:43:35AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > bart - > > you can likely deduce some answers from: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html > > 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about. > then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots > that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels comfortable > calling 4.7-RELEASE. > > so, as you track RELENG_4, you will obtain each tag point sequentially. > if you cvsup your sources every day, you will know when RC2 is available > because "uname -a" will show 4.7-RC2. > > -Adam > > > >> (10.06.2002 @ 0134 PST): Bart Smit said, in 0.5K: << > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the > > very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC. > > > > Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes > > even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are. > > > > What are the other versions? How does one get RC2? Is there a separate > > prerelease-branch somewhere that I'm missing? > > > > --Bart > > > > I have exactly the same question, I track RELENG_4 and in fact have rebuilt the sources several times, yesterday being the last time. I only ever see 4.7-RC, never an RC2 or PRERELEASE note. -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : +31 (0)10 4764595 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: versioning
bart - you can likely deduce some answers from: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about. then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels comfortable calling 4.7-RELEASE. so, as you track RELENG_4, you will obtain each tag point sequentially. if you cvsup your sources every day, you will know when RC2 is available because "uname -a" will show 4.7-RC2. -Adam >> (10.06.2002 @ 0134 PST): Bart Smit said, in 0.5K: << > > Hello, > > I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the > very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC. > > Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes > even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are. > > What are the other versions? How does one get RC2? Is there a separate > prerelease-branch somewhere that I'm missing? > > --Bart > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > >> end of "versioning" from Bart Smit << -- "Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw." -Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch" Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vectors.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
versioning
Hello, I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC. Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are. What are the other versions? How does one get RC2? Is there a separate prerelease-branch somewhere that I'm missing? --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
