gcc5 question

2015-12-02 Thread William A. Mahaffey III



I just did a pkg-upgrade of gcc5, & upgraded the port as well. I noticed 
that a 'make showconfig' in the port now shows Graphite support enabled 
by default. However, a 'gcc -v --help' on the pkg installed version 
shows no libisl, req'd for Graphite support (I think). Is the pkg built 
differently from the port ? TIA & have a good one.



*K*  I meant gcc5-devel, sorry :-/ 


--

William A. Mahaffey III

 --

"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
 ever devised by man."
   -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.

___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gcc5 question

2015-12-02 Thread William A. Mahaffey III

On 12/02/15 18:33, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Dimitry Andric wrote:

I just did a pkg-upgrade of gcc5, & upgraded the port as well. I noticed that a 
'make showconfig' in the port now shows Graphite support enabled by default. However, a 
'gcc -v --help' on the pkg installed version shows no libisl, req'd for Graphite 
support (I think). Is the pkg built differently from the port ? TIA & have a good 
one.

I've tried building the port with the GRAPHITE option enabled, but it
died with various compilation errors about missing isl types, even while
isl was installed.  So I'm not sure about the state of this support. :-)

Gerald, any idea?  I suppose the option is expected to work?

If you have an up-to-date lang/gcc5 port, you should not be
able to specify GRAPHITE any longer.

Somehow my testing must have been flawed (even though I recall it
explicitly tested, so perhaps a typo when specifying the option)
and this will be fixed when updating to GCC 5.3, hopefully in the
next few days.

Give lang/gcc5-devel a try, which is close to what GCC 5.3 is
going to be.  That one should work.  I tested it again yesterday,
just to be sure.

Gerald
___
freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



It was/is indeed gcc5-devel, & I am compiling it up now, so all is well 
AFA it does indeed appear to compile OK & work (I have gotten some 
inhouse to compile up today, to test it overnight). Sorry for the 
confusion :-/. On a related topic, it would be sweet if the devel 
compiler were installed in /usr/local/bin, w/ a slightly different name 
(gcc5X, gcc5d, maybe gcc521(X|d), you get the picture), for convenient 
back-to-back comparisons if req'd 


--

William A. Mahaffey III

 --

"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
 ever devised by man."
   -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.

___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"