[Bug 218164] lang/gcc5: Bootstrap comparison failure

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218164

Rene Ladan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
 Status|New |Closed
 CC||r...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #4 from Rene Ladan  ---
Expired port removed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 218164] lang/gcc5: Bootstrap comparison failure

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218164

Gerald Pfeifer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|ger...@freebsd.org  |freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o
   ||rg
  Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gerald |
   |@FreeBSD.org)   |

--- Comment #3 from Gerald Pfeifer  ---
(In reply to Michał "phoe" Herda from comment #2)
> I can build both gcc5 and gcc48 as long as I do not select bootstrapping 
> in config.

If anything, it's actually supposed to be the other way around,
boostrapping should be the safer option.

The error you see is GCC compiling itself repeatedly does not lead
to a consistent result as it should.

Clearly this does not happen for other SPARC targets of GCC, and I'm
afraid I won't be able to help with this.

(Luckily there is at least a workaround of disabling bootstrap, which
is the default for lang/gcc.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"