Re: [toolchain] gcc5-devel question
On 03/01/16 15:33, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I run gcc5 from the CLI or under make as a regular user, it reports no
Graphite support compiled in. When I update the gcc5-devel port, it reports
Graphite enabled:
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:47am] 504 % make showconfig
===> The following configuration options are available for
gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20160223:
BOOTSTRAP=on: Build using a full bootstrap
GRAPHITE=on: Support for Graphite loop optimizations
JAVA=on: Java platform support
===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:51am] 505 %
This appears odd.
Just to make sure, in both cases it's the gcc5-devel port / package?
Or might one be gcc5, and the other gcc5-devel? That should not make
a difference (cf. `diff gcc5/Makefile gcc5-devel/Makefile`), but might
if there are local changes on your system somewhere.
Best of my knowlege, yes. That's why I included some of the other info
in my OP. When I did the pkg upgrade, the /usr/local/bin/gcc5 upgraded
to something dated Feb 27. When I build the port (make install), I get
some error trying to install it, but it builds OK & leaves everything in
a deep 'staging' directory. The binaries are different.
pkg output:
[root@devbox, /etc, 4:00:55pm] 512 % grep gcc5 LIST.installed.txt
gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20160223 GNU Compiler Collection 5
[root@devbox, /etc, 4:01:04pm] 513 % pkg info | grep -i gcc5
gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20160223 GNU Compiler Collection 5
[root@devbox, /etc, 4:01:14pm] 514 % uname -a
FreeBSD devbox 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed Jan 13
17:55:39 UTC 2016
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[root@devbox, /etc, 4:01:19pm] 515 %
Checking the actual files (as regular user, from earlier today):
[wam@devbox, pre, 10:34:26am] 576 % !566
find /usr/local/bin/ -name gcc\* -exec ls -CFltr {} +
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 643768 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc48*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24880 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib48*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24880 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm48*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24920 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar48*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20 Nov 30 21:35 /usr/local/bin/gcc@ ->
/usr/local/bin/gcc48
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 846360 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc49*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib49*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm49*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar49*
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 895144 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc5*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib5*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm5*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25944 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5*
[wam@devbox, pre, 10:34:33am] 577 % ( ll
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc* )
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25944 Mar 1 10:27
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Mar 1 10:27
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc-nm5*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Mar 1 10:27
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib5*
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 895144 Mar 1 10:27
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc5*
[wam@devbox, pre, 10:34:48am] 578 % diff /usr/local/bin/gcc5
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc5
Files /usr/local/bin/gcc5 and
/usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gcc5 differ
[wam@devbox, pre, 10:35:03am] 579 %
Is it intentional that the port & pkg have different support options
(specifically Graphite) ?
Nope. Unless you changed it locally. ;-)
Gerald
Where is that info stored ? When I do a 'ls -ltr' on the port directory,
the Makefile shows up as dated Feb 27:
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 4:05:55pm] 517 % ( lltr )
total 1060
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 239 Aug 23 2014 pkg-descr
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2869 Sep 26 06:09 pkg-plist
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 140 Feb 27 16:23 distinfo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5342 Feb 27 16:23 Makefile
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 6 Mar 1 09:29 files/
drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel17 Mar 1 10:27 work/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12157916 Mar 1 10:27 LIST
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 4:05:56pm] 517 %
I thought that would trump anything else, no ?
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
-- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Re: [toolchain] gcc5-devel question
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > When I run gcc5 from the CLI or under make as a regular user, it reports no > Graphite support compiled in. When I update the gcc5-devel port, it reports > Graphite enabled: > > > [root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:47am] 504 % make showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for > gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20160223: > BOOTSTRAP=on: Build using a full bootstrap > GRAPHITE=on: Support for Graphite loop optimizations > JAVA=on: Java platform support > ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings > [root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:51am] 505 % This appears odd. Just to make sure, in both cases it's the gcc5-devel port / package? Or might one be gcc5, and the other gcc5-devel? That should not make a difference (cf. `diff gcc5/Makefile gcc5-devel/Makefile`), but might if there are local changes on your system somewhere. > Is it intentional that the port & pkg have different support options > (specifically Graphite) ? Nope. Unless you changed it locally. ;-) Gerald ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gcc5-devel question
I did a full pkg upgrade on my FreeBSD 9.3R developement box this A.M. This upgraded gcc5-devel, as it should have. My system gcc5 seems to come from the pkg: [root@devbox, /etc, 10:22:49am] 494 % pkg query '%Fp' gcc5-devel | grep 'local/bin/gcc' /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm5 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib5 /usr/local/bin/gcc5 [root@devbox, /etc, 10:22:54am] 495 % ll -tr /usr/local/bin/gcc* -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 643768 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc48* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24880 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib48* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24880 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm48* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 24920 Nov 30 21:34 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar48* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20 Nov 30 21:35 /usr/local/bin/gcc@ -> /usr/local/bin/gcc48 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 846360 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc49* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib49* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm49* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25464 Feb 20 05:07 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar49* -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 895144 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc5* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ranlib5* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25912 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-nm5* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 25944 Feb 27 23:00 /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5* [root@devbox, /etc, 10:22:56am] 496 % which gcc5 /usr/local/bin/gcc5 [root@devbox, /etc, 10:23:49am] 497 % When I run gcc5 from the CLI or under make as a regular user, it reports no Graphite support compiled in. When I update the gcc5-devel port, it reports Graphite enabled: [root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:47am] 504 % make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20160223: BOOTSTRAP=on: Build using a full bootstrap GRAPHITE=on: Support for Graphite loop optimizations JAVA=on: Java platform support ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings [root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24:51am] 505 % Is it intentional that the port & pkg have different support options (specifically Graphite) ? -- William A. Mahaffey III -- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [toolchain] gcc5-devel question
Hi William, On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due to changed > options. I cd'ed to /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel & poked around a bit. I > saw no files or directories dated today, the latest was dated Dec 02, > the last time I upgraded & did a 'make install'. I did a find in > /usr/ports & /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel was all there was. Did the > compiler indeed get reinstalled ? If so, where :-) ? the location should not have changed, nor should have any packaging (additional files, say). > Also, when I did a 'make showconfig', it showed graphite support ready > to go (*yipp*, kudos), but no executable that I could locate on > short notice. Do I still need to compile it up, or is there an > executable ready to go somewhere not-so-obvious to me :-) ? Graphite support means additional optimizations GCC can perform (if you specify the respective options). You need to build the lang/gcc* ports that support Graphite with the respective option (GRAPHITE) enabled. It is off by default, and thus not part of packages. > When I last compiled it up last week, I did a 'make install > FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1' which overwrote /usr/local/bin/gcc5 (not a huge > issue, but still ), how do I tell it to install the executable under > a different name ? BTW, I am *NOT* particularly familiar w/ the 'GNU > way', so pardon me if this is a bit noobish :-/ TIA & have a good > one. I am not aware of the FreeBSD packaging system supporting the renaming of individual files within a package. You could try to install into a different location and then tweak things there, I guess. Gerald ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [toolchain] gcc5-devel question
On 12/23/15 05:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi William, On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due to changed options. I cd'ed to /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel & poked around a bit. I saw no files or directories dated today, the latest was dated Dec 02, the last time I upgraded & did a 'make install'. I did a find in /usr/ports & /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel was all there was. Did the compiler indeed get reinstalled ? If so, where :-) ? the location should not have changed, nor should have any packaging (additional files, say). 1st, thanks for your reply. This question was/is stupidly worded :-). What I was/am asking is whether the pkg-installed version of this compiler is compiled for Graphite support OOTB. The answer appears to be 'no'. I just pkg-upgraded to the newest version & it is now called 5.3.1: [29/33] Upgrading gcc5-devel from 5.2.1.s20151124 to 5.3.1.s20151208... [29/33] Extracting gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20151208: .. done However, when queried from the command line, it doesn't mention 'libisl' (req'd for Graphite support) & when I try to compile code using Graphite optimization (-floop-parallelize-all for me) it fails w/ an error message saying Graphite support not available: f951: sorry, unimplemented: Graphite loop optimizations cannot be used (ISL is not available)(-fgraphite, -fgraphite-identity, -floop-block, -floop-interchange, -floo p-strip-mine, -floop-parallelize-all, -floop-unroll-and-jam, and -ftree-loop-linear) libisl is indeed available, pkg installed & ready to go. When I upgraded ports (portsnap fetch update) this A.M., nothing got upgraded, everything still dated 12/09 or earlier (when I last rebuilt it to turn on Graphite support, which apparently worked AOK) except for the log files from my compile. The port showed/shows Graphite enabled by default (I think). So, another question is whether the pkg & port have different build configurations ? Also, when I did a 'make showconfig', it showed graphite support ready to go (*yipp*, kudos), but no executable that I could locate on short notice. Do I still need to compile it up, or is there an executable ready to go somewhere not-so-obvious to me :-) ? Graphite support means additional optimizations GCC can perform (if you specify the respective options). You need to build the lang/gcc* ports that support Graphite with the respective option (GRAPHITE) enabled. It is off by default, and thus not part of packages. When I last compiled it up last week, I did a 'make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1' which overwrote /usr/local/bin/gcc5 (not a huge issue, but still ), how do I tell it to install the executable under a different name ? BTW, I am *NOT* particularly familiar w/ the 'GNU way', so pardon me if this is a bit noobish :-/ TIA & have a good one. I am not aware of the FreeBSD packaging system supporting the renaming of individual files within a package. You could try to install into a different location and then tweak things there, I guess. Gerald -- William A. Mahaffey III -- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gcc5-devel question
I just did a 'pkg upgrade -y' when I noticed upgraded LibGL available. I was hoping it might include static versions of libGL/GLU/GLw, but no such luck. However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due to changed options. I cd'ed to /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel & poked around a bit. I saw no files or directories dated today, the latest was dated Dec 02, the last time I upgraded & did a 'make install'. I did a find in /usr/ports & /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel was all there was. Did the compiler indeed get reinstalled ? If so, where :-) ? Also, when I did a 'make showconfig', it showed graphite support ready to go (*yipp*, kudos), but no executable that I could locate on short notice. Do I still need to compile it up, or is there an executable ready to go somewhere not-so-obvious to me :-) ? When I last compiled it up last week, I did a 'make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1' which overwrote /usr/local/bin/gcc5 (not a huge issue, but still ), how do I tell it to install the executable under a different name ? BTW, I am *NOT* particularly familiar w/ the 'GNU way', so pardon me if this is a bit noobish :-/ TIA & have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III -- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
