Transfer size limits
What's the largest practical bulk transfer size in the -8 USB stack? I'm currently transferring frames through a UE_BULK pipe from a Mightex camera (it uses bulk, not isochronous.) Currently, I'm setting usbd_xfer_max_len(xfer)==32768. If I could set it large enough for a complete frame (5 MB), it would simplify the logic of my driver. Large transfers didn't work reliably with the -7 USB stack, because of some obscure problem with setting up DMA transfers in the ehci driver with more than a few separate physical regions. -- Trevor Blackwell650 776 7870t...@tlb.org ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT: axe(4) performance patch
Hi pyun! On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:08:49 -0700 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge > > 60Mbps, 60Mbps, 25Mbps > > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> rl > > 90Mbps, 60Mbps, 40Mbps > > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge > > 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps > > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> re > > 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps > I'm not sure I understood the test environment. > But it looks un-patched axe(4) performs better, right? Yes. I think that these are strange. > One odd thing is performance differences for AX88172. My patch does > not touch AX88172 controller but your benchmark shows big > differences for AX88172. Are you sure you didn't apply other > patches for axe(4)/USB stack? Ehh, I was wrong, there was a change No I don't apply any patch to axe/usb. > for AX88172. The bufsize was changed to 16KB from 2KB for AX88172, > that was not my intention. It seems new USB stack has no easy way > to configure this parameter in attach phase so I used 16KB. Would > you try changing the value to MCLBYTES(aorund line number 208 in > patched if_axe.c) and test it on AX88172? I'll try, please wait a while. > Also please let me know what netperf parameters were used in the > test. Simple-fully, it's all default. Server: netserver Client: netperf -H Server > > U, I'll try to update old(rl) machine to pached, and re-test. > > Thank you. > It seems you have all three variants that axe(4) supports, so would > you test "http://p4db.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168602";? Yes, too! Thank you. ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
usb/138915: [patch] add support for SheevaPlug serial interface to uftdi driver
>Number: 138915
>Category: usb
>Synopsis: [patch] add support for SheevaPlug serial interface to uftdi
>driver
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-usb
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 17 21:20:00 UTC 2009
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Maks Verver
>Release:FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
I have a Marvell SheevaPlug that I tried to interface with FreeBSD. It has an
FTDI based USB-to-serial adapter for this purpose, and the existing uftdi
driver seems to work fine, except that the USB device is currently not
recognized by the driver.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
I've attached a patch to add the vendor and product id for the Marvell
SheevaPlug to the USB device list, add it to the uftdi source, and update the
uftdi man page accordingly.
Patch attached with submission follows:
diff -ur sys.bak/dev/usb/serial/uftdi.c sys/dev/usb/serial/uftdi.c
--- sys.bak/dev/usb/serial/uftdi.c 2009-09-17 22:36:04.0 +0200
+++ sys/dev/usb/serial/uftdi.c 2009-09-17 21:55:11.0 +0200
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@
{USB_VPI(USB_VENDOR_INTREPIDCS, USB_PRODUCT_INTREPIDCS_NEOVI,
UFTDI_TYPE_8U232AM)},
{USB_VPI(USB_VENDOR_BBELECTRONICS, USB_PRODUCT_BBELECTRONICS_USOTL4,
UFTDI_TYPE_8U232AM)},
{USB_VPI(USB_VENDOR_MELCO, USB_PRODUCT_MELCO_PCOPRS1,
UFTDI_TYPE_8U232AM)},
+ {USB_VPI(USB_VENDOR_MARVELL, USB_PRODUCT_MARVELL_SHEEVAPLUG,
UFTDI_TYPE_8U232AM)},
};
static int
diff -ur sys.bak/dev/usb/usbdevs sys/dev/usb/usbdevs
--- sys.bak/dev/usb/usbdevs 2009-09-17 22:36:05.0 +0200
+++ sys/dev/usb/usbdevs 2009-09-17 21:54:03.0 +0200
@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@
vendor INTEL 0x8086 Intel
vendor SITECOM20x9016 Sitecom
vendor MOSCHIP 0x9710 MosChip Semiconductor
+vendor MARVELL 0x9e88 Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
vendor 3COM3 0xa727 3Com
vendor HP2 0xf003 Hewlett Packard
vendor USRP0xfffe GNU Radio USRP
@@ -1691,6 +1692,9 @@
/* Macally products */
product MACALLY MOUSE1 0x0101 mouse
+/* Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. products */
+product MARVELL SHEEVAPLUG 0x9e8f SheevaPlug serial interface
+
/* MCT Corp. */
product MCT HUB01000x0100 Hub
product MCT DU_H3SP_USB232 0x0200 D-Link DU-H3SP USB BAY Hub
diff -r share.bak/man/man4/uftdi.4 share/man/man4/uftdi.4
89a90,91
> .It
> Marvell SheevaPlug serial interface
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT: axe(4) performance patch
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:06:57AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi pyun! > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:37:22 -0700 > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > I submitted axe(4) performance patch to Hans and he committed the > > patch to P4. > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168457 > > I tested following environments: > Thanks a lot nork@ ! > AX88178(GbE), AX88172(100), AX88772(100), bge(GbE), re(GbE), rl(100) > > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> rl > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> re > > My environment, there are 3 machines: > +--++-++ (All port GbE L2SW) > || | >bge re rl >(patched) (old) > >bge: FreeBSD 7.2-stable > re: FreeBSD 9-current > rl: FreeBSD 8.0-beta4 > > > For test environments: > +--++---+---+---+ +--+-+--+--+---+ > || ||| | >bge re rl-axebge re-axerl > (old)(patched) > > > According to netperf, > > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge >60Mbps, 60Mbps, 25Mbps > patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> rl >90Mbps, 60Mbps, 40Mbps > > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge > 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps > old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> re > 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps > I'm not sure I understood the test environment. But it looks un-patched axe(4) performs better, right? One odd thing is performance differences for AX88172. My patch does not touch AX88172 controller but your benchmark shows big differences for AX88172. Are you sure you didn't apply other patches for axe(4)/USB stack? Ehh, I was wrong, there was a change for AX88172. The bufsize was changed to 16KB from 2KB for AX88172, that was not my intention. It seems new USB stack has no easy way to configure this parameter in attach phase so I used 16KB. Would you try changing the value to MCLBYTES(aorund line number 208 in patched if_axe.c) and test it on AX88172? Also please let me know what netperf parameters were used in the test. > U, I'll try to update old(rl) machine to pached, and re-test. > > Thank you. It seems you have all three variants that axe(4) supports, so would you test "http://p4db.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168602";? ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
usb/138904: unpluging USB wifi card panics system
>Number: 138904 >Category: usb >Synopsis: unpluging USB wifi card panics system >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible:freebsd-usb >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 17 16:40:03 UTC 2009 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Radim Kolar >Release:FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p4 i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD 7.2 wifi Card is USB asus, freebsd identifies it as RT2573 rev 0x2573a RF RT2528 , using rum0 >Description: fatal trap 12, supervisor read page not presenT current process wpa_suppliciant >How-To-Repeat: it can be repeated everytime, run wpa_sup to connect to wifi network, uplug card. system panics after few seconds bt #4 0xc0ae4180 in trap_pfault (frame=0xcdc0fa6c, usermode=0, eva=3264947216) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:852 #5 0xc0ae4b2c in trap (frame=0xcdc0fa6c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:530 #6 0xc0ac923b in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:159 #7 0xc072ff97 in rum_write_multi (sc=0xc29b1000, reg=Variable "reg" is not avai lable. ) at /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:1581 #8 0xc072ffdb in rum_write (sc=Variable "sc" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:1564 #9 0xc07305ce in rum_stop (priv=Variable "priv" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:2229 #10 0xc0732049 in rum_init (priv=0xc29b1000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:2086 #11 0xc07331b8 in rum_ioctl (ifp=0xc2652000, cmd=2149607696, data=0xc2775300 "rum0") at /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:1488 #12 0xc087b17e in ifhwioctl (cmd=2149607696, ifp=0xc2652000, data=0xc2775300 "rum0", td=0xc26308c0) at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:1719 #13 0xc087dc3d in ifioctl (so=0xc299a680, cmd=2149607696, data=0xc2775300 "rum0", td=0xc26308c0) at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:2009 #14 0xc082263a in soo_ioctl (fp=0xc2789000, cmd=2149607696, data=0xc2775300, active_cred=0xc29a2300, td=0xc26308c0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_socket.c:191 #15 0xc081b3e5 in kern_ioctl (td=0xc26308c0, fd=3, com=2149607696, data=0xc2775300 "rum0") at file.h:269 #16 0xc081b544 in ioctl (td=0xc26308c0, uap=0xcdc0fcfc) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:571 #17 0xc0ae44d5 in syscall (frame=0xcdc0fd38) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1090 #18 0xc0ac92a0 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:255 #19 0x0033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
How to get /dev/uscanner0 to use ehci at USB2 speed, not uhci ?
Hi FreeBSD-USB@ people, With 7.2-RELEASE, how should I get /dev/uscanner0 to use ehci at USB2 speed, not uhci at USB1 ? (Please feel free to reply RTFM ... URL= ) Logs & My config & what I've tried / looked at: My USB scanner works, but its agoning slow in high res. devd: Processing event '+uscanner0 vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d devclass=0xff devsubclass=0x00 release=0x0100 sernum="" intclass=0xff intsubclass=0x00 at port=0 interface=0 vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d devclass=0xff devsubclass=0x00 release=0x0100 sernum="" intclass=0xff intsubclass=0x00 on uhub1' dmesg extract: -- uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 21 at device 16.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 21 at device 16.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 21 at device 16.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xe400-0xe41f irq 21 at device 16.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfae0-0xfae000ff irq 21 at device 16.4 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered uscanner0: on uhub1 uscanner0: at uhub1 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected uscanner0: detached uscanner0: on uhub1 uscanner0: at uhub1 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected uscanner0: detached uscanner0: on uhub1 -- config -x /boot/kernel/kernel # includes all of device uhci device ehci device uscanner uname -a FreeBSD john.js.berklix.net 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Tue May 5 00:41:36 CEST 2009 jhs@@@john.js.berklix.net:/usr1/src/sys/amd64/compile/JOHN64.small amd64 sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8, product=0x011d) at /dev/uscanner0 PS I had a quick look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/scanners.html but nothing I noticed. cd /usr/src ; find . -name \*devctl\* ./share/man/man4/devctl.4 # no binary just the manual. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail ASCII plain text not HTML & Base64. http://asciiribbon.org Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/ ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT: axe(4) performance patch
Hi pyun! On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:37:22 -0700 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > I submitted axe(4) performance patch to Hans and he committed the > patch to P4. > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168457 I tested following environments: AX88178(GbE), AX88172(100), AX88772(100), bge(GbE), re(GbE), rl(100) patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> rl old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> re My environment, there are 3 machines: +--++-++ (All port GbE L2SW) || | bge re rl (patched) (old) bge: FreeBSD 7.2-stable re: FreeBSD 9-current rl: FreeBSD 8.0-beta4 For test environments: +--++---+---+---+ +--+-+--+--+---+ || ||| | bge re rl-axebge re-axerl (old)(patched) According to netperf, patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge 60Mbps, 60Mbps, 25Mbps patched:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> rl 90Mbps, 60Mbps, 40Mbps old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> bge 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps old:AX88178, AX88172, AX88772 <-> re 180Mbps, 90Mbps, 95Mbps U, I'll try to update old(rl) machine to pached, and re-test. Thank you. ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Porting USB stack into BlackFin
On Thursday 17 September 2009 08:50:18 balabharathi d wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a project requiring a USB Host stack which will run on > anblackFin using VDK kernel. I would like to explore the possibility of > using the USB stack from FreeBSD. Please share the link for source files > and documentation. src/sys/dev/usb In FreeBSD 8 and 9-current. --HPS ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485
The following reply was made to PR usb/138879; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Cc: Arrigo Marchiori , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:48:20 +0200 Hi, Your patch has been committed into FreeBSD's USB P4 repository for FreeBSD 9- current. http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168603 --HPS @ Eurbsdcon2009 ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485
Hi, Your patch has been committed into FreeBSD's USB P4 repository for FreeBSD 9- current. http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=168603 --HPS @ Eurbsdcon2009 ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485
The following reply was made to PR usb/138879; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Arrigo Marchiori To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:30:47 +0200 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > Is this patched in 9-current? My patch is against the sources of 7-STABLE, cvsupp'ed on September 16, 2009. I don't know if it also fits the -CURRENT sources -- it should be quite easy to adapt, though. What the patch does, in fact, is just adding the product IDs to the supported chips, treating them the same as (for instance) USB_PRODUCT_FTDI_EMCU2H. -- rigo http://rigo.altervista.org ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: usb/138879: [uftdi] [patch] Patch to add support for CTI USB-Mini 485 and USB-Nano 485
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > Is this patched in 9-current? My patch is against the sources of 7-STABLE, cvsupp'ed on September 16, 2009. I don't know if it also fits the -CURRENT sources -- it should be quite easy to adapt, though. What the patch does, in fact, is just adding the product IDs to the supported chips, treating them the same as (for instance) USB_PRODUCT_FTDI_EMCU2H. -- rigo http://rigo.altervista.org ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Porting USB stack into BlackFin
Hi, I am working on a project requiring a USB Host stack which will run on anblackFin using VDK kernel. I would like to explore the possibility of using the USB stack from FreeBSD. Please share the link for source files and documentation. Thanks bala ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
