[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #15473] Client refuses to quit after connecting to external server
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #15473 (project freeciv): Most likely it was problem in SDL. I've had other problems with it. And I have not seen this in over 4 years now. Can be closed as WontFix as soon as we're dropping sdl-1.2 support. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?15473 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14514] wish: display defense value after modifiers
Update of bug #14514 (project freeciv): Status: Need Info = None ___ Follow-up Comment #2: The problem is that the defense value might depend on attacker. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14514 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv 2.5.0 second release candidate: source code released
The second release candidate for Freeciv 2.5.0 is now available as source code for download. This fixes some notable bugs in the Qt client in RC1, and updates the Trident tileset. Full details at http://www.freeciv.org/wiki/NEWS-2.5.0-RC2. Download the source tarball from one of our mirrors: http://www.freeciv.org/wiki/Download#Beta_2.5. (Windows packages should follow shortly at the same location.) A reminder of what's new in 2.5.x compared to 2.4.x: http://www.freeciv.org/wiki/NEWS-2.5.0. Thanks to all contributors and bug reporters that helped with this release. On behalf of the Freeciv Dev Team, Jacob Nevins ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5889] Experimental ruleset's Marco Polo not to grant new connections
Update of patch #5889 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5889 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv 2.5.0 second release candidate: source code released
I wrote: The second release candidate for Freeciv 2.5.0 is now available as source code for download. String freeze will continue until 2.5.0 is finally released. Translation stats for 2.5.0-RC2: (Remember, there's still time to submit translations for 2.5.0 -- at least a week, maybe longer.) freeciv: fr: 100%: 6171 translated. en_GB: 100%: 6171 translated. ca: 100%: 6171 translated. ru: 100%: 6171 translated. pl: 97.7%: 6028 translated, 85 fuzzy, 58 untranslated. fi: 95.6%: 5902 translated, 154 fuzzy, 115 untranslated. es: 86%: 5301 translated, 588 fuzzy, 282 untranslated. gd: 86%: 5279 translated, 609 fuzzy, 283 untranslated. de: 85%: 5276 translated, 577 fuzzy, 318 untranslated. ja: 84%: 5212 translated, 639 fuzzy, 320 untranslated. da: 73%: 4488 translated, 1165 fuzzy, 518 untranslated. uk: 66%: 4054 translated, 1252 fuzzy, 865 untranslated. it: 63%: 3896 translated, 1480 fuzzy, 795 untranslated. nl: 63%: 3888 translated, 1367 fuzzy, 916 untranslated. pt_BR: 59%: 3668 translated, 1685 fuzzy, 818 untranslated. ko: 52%: 3235 translated, 1253 fuzzy, 1683 untranslated. sv: 52%: 3189 translated, 1659 fuzzy, 1323 untranslated. id: 45%: 2762 translated, 484 fuzzy, 2925 untranslated. ga: 43%: 2681 translated, 508 fuzzy, 2982 untranslated. tr: 43%: 2636 translated, 2065 fuzzy, 1470 untranslated. et: 42%: 2563 translated, 2168 fuzzy, 1440 untranslated. cs: 41%: 2558 translated, 2257 fuzzy, 1356 untranslated. eo: 40%: 2456 translated, 1638 fuzzy, 2077 untranslated. lt: 38%: 2350 translated, 1660 fuzzy, 2161 untranslated. ro: 38%: 2315 translated, 2261 fuzzy, 1595 untranslated. nb: 36%: 2224 translated, 2522 fuzzy, 1425 untranslated. ar: 36%: 2216 translated, 2593 fuzzy, 1362 untranslated. zh_CN: 36%: 2214 translated, 2400 fuzzy, 1557 untranslated. el: 32%: 1992 translated, 1829 fuzzy, 2350 untranslated. sr: 31%: 1886 translated, 993 fuzzy, 3292 untranslated. hu: 28%: 1711 translated, 2692 fuzzy, 1768 untranslated. zh_TW: 28%: 1707 translated, 234 fuzzy, 4230 untranslated. pt: 26%: 1581 translated, 2697 fuzzy, 1893 untranslated. he: 24%: 1480 translated, 1507 fuzzy, 3184 untranslated. fa: 23%: 1445 translated, 1625 fuzzy, 3101 untranslated. bg: 22%: 1387 translated, 487 fuzzy, 4297 untranslated. nations: fr: 100%: 1844 translated. pl: 100%: 1844 translated. ca: 100%: 1844 translated. en_GB: 100%: 1844 translated. ru: 100%: 1844 translated. es: 97.2%: 1793 translated, 26 fuzzy, 25 untranslated. ja: 92%: 1697 translated, 58 fuzzy, 89 untranslated. fi: 87%: 1604 translated, 26 fuzzy, 214 untranslated. de: 84%: 1555 translated, 26 fuzzy, 263 untranslated. gd: 84%: 1546 translated, 150 fuzzy, 148 untranslated. da: 60%: 1101 translated, 395 fuzzy, 348 untranslated. nl: 52%: 958 translated, 551 fuzzy, 335 untranslated. id: 50%: 923 translated, 61 fuzzy, 860 untranslated. ga: 48%: 882 translated, 311 fuzzy, 651 untranslated. uk: 44%: 809 translated, 532 fuzzy, 503 untranslated. zh_TW: 37%: 684 translated, 22 fuzzy, 1138 untranslated. bg: 23%: 431 translated, 319 fuzzy, 1094 untranslated. it: 20%: 368 translated, 979 fuzzy, 497 untranslated. pt_BR: 20%: 367 translated, 999 fuzzy, 478 untranslated. sv: 17%: 313 translated, 964 fuzzy, 567 untranslated. lt: 14%: 265 translated, 1006 fuzzy, 573 untranslated. eo: 14%: 253 translated, 933 fuzzy, 658 untranslated. ko: 12%: 228 translated, 1004 fuzzy, 612 untranslated. et: 12%: 218 translated, 1039 fuzzy, 587 untranslated. cs: 11%: 196 translated, 1049 fuzzy, 599 untranslated. fa: 10%: 181 translated, 1020 fuzzy, 643 untranslated. tr: 10%: 177 translated, 1027 fuzzy, 640 untranslated. zh_CN: 9%: 167 translated, 1061 fuzzy, 616 untranslated. el: 9%: 165 translated, 987 fuzzy, 692 untranslated. he: 8%: 143 translated, 922 fuzzy, 779 untranslated. ar: 8%: 140 translated, 1104 fuzzy, 600 untranslated. sr: 8%: 139 translated, 959 fuzzy, 746 untranslated. ro: 6%: 111 translated, 1075 fuzzy, 658 untranslated. hu: 6%: 102 translated, 1097 fuzzy, 645 untranslated. nb: 5%: 95 translated, 1076 fuzzy, 673 untranslated. pt: 3.4%: 62 translated, 1141 fuzzy, 641 untranslated. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23347] Json packet parsing error message fails to show packet content
Update of bug #23347 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Fixed Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23347 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5914] json packet logging
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5914 Summary: json packet logging Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 11:33:26 AM EET Category: freeciv-web Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 3.0.0 ___ Details: Add log_packet_json (defined to log_debug) to show json strings sent and received. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Sat 07 Mar 2015 11:33:26 AM EET Name: JsonLogging.patch Size: 1kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24013 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5914 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [task #7890] Windows packages for 2.5.0-RC2
URL: http://gna.org/task/?7890 Summary: Windows packages for 2.5.0-RC2 Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 11:14:15 UTC Should Start On: Sat 07 Mar 2015 00:00:00 UTC Should be Finished on: Sun 15 Mar 2015 00:00:00 UTC Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Need Info Privacy: Public Percent Complete: 0% Assigned to: cproc Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Effort: 0.00 Planned Release: ___ Details: Tarball not up yet, but will be soon. Same recipe as 2.5.0-RC1, I think. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/task/?7890 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [task #7890] Windows packages for 2.5.0-RC2
Update of task #7890 (project freeciv): Status: Need Info = None ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Tarball now at Gna http://download.gna.org/freeciv/beta/freeciv-2.5.0-RC2.tar.bz2. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/task/?7890 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5913] json protocol: Handle multiple packets in buffer -case
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5913 Summary: json protocol: Handle multiple packets in buffer -case Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 11:07:58 AM EET Category: freeciv-web Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 3.0.0 ___ Details: Correttly shift and keep unhandled data in incoming buffer when handling json -packets. Previously all of the data was scrapped (not *really*, but anyway size of the buffer content was marked 0), breaking the stream when there's multiple packets in queue. It seems that this has not been an big issue with freeciv-web with proxy feeding the server relatively slowly, but trying to get regular server and client to communicate with json-protocol on the same machine never goes longer than just an packet or two without this fix. Not that this alone would yet allow one to get succesfull login to the server. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Sat 07 Mar 2015 11:07:58 AM EET Name: JsonMultipacket.patch Size: 2kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24012 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5913 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23351] No extrastyle base.outpost
Update of bug #23351 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Fixed Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23351 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23343] New Japanese translation for Freeciv ver2.5.0
Update of bug #23343 (project freeciv): Priority: 5 - Normal = 7 - High Assigned to:None = jtn Planned Release: = 2.5.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Oh, rats, forgot about this for 2.5.0-RC2. Sorry. Will get it in 2.5.0. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23343 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5900] Add entry about tinycthreads to README.packaging
Update of patch #5900 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5900 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23363] Qt-client help wrong in respect to extras (= S2_6)
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?23363 Summary: Qt-client help wrong in respect to extras (= S2_6) Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 01:46:51 AM EET Category: client-qt Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: None Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: Qt-client terrain help is based on 2.5 codebase. Unfortunately that's very much unsuitable for generic extras of 2.6+. You may want to check gtk-client help changes for reference (e.g. patch #5884) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23363 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5896] Alien hut_enter callback
Update of patch #5896 (project freeciv): Planned Release:2.6.0, 3.0.0 = 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #3: There's no real reason not to commit this to S2_5 too. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5896 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5896] Alien hut_enter callback
Update of patch #5896 (project freeciv): Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 = 2.5, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #5: I thought that (and the point of entering exact freeciv version to target release in general), but didn't want to start asking permissions. Thanks for granting them anyway. :-) I'll commit in ~36h. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5896 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23362] civ2civ3 help: Settlers, Workers, and Engineers but not Migrants
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?23362 Summary: civ2civ3 help: Settlers, Workers, and Engineers but not Migrants Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 22:39:40 UTC Category: rulesets Severity: 2 - Minor Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: jtn Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: 2.5.0-RC2 Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: Any Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: There are a few places in the civ2civ3 help where Migrants should be mentioned but aren't: * tech help for tech enabling fortresses (and railroads and maglev on 2.6+; bug #23281 is about backporting this) * help for Nuclear unit, explaining who can clean up the fallout (Possibly attack this at the same time as patch #5858?) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23362 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5895] Help: Show extra build time in terrain help
Update of patch #5895 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5895 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5918] Sanity check boolean effects
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5918 Summary: Sanity check boolean effects Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:53:25 AM EET Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: Add ruleset sanity check that effect that has any negative value effects has also positive value effects. Only negative values added to 0 could never change the state of the boolean. It would stay 'disabled' like it is initially. I went through entire effects type list for TRUNK. For later branches I removed the effect types that are completely new since the branch in question. I also remembered that EFT_REVOLUTION_WHEN_UNHAPPY has turned from boolean to integer only after S2_5 (not that negative values would make sense for it as integer either). There might be other similar former boolean effects that I have missed to add to the list of older branches. All that means is that those won't get sanity checked. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:53:25 AM EET Name: BooleanSanity.patch Size: 2kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24015 --- Date: Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:53:25 AM EET Name: BooleanSanity-S2_6.patch Size: 2kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24016 --- Date: Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:53:25 AM EET Name: BooleanSanity-S2_5.patch Size: 2kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24017 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5918 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5898] Ruleset sanity check message typofix thouugh - though
Update of patch #5898 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5898 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [task #7890] Windows packages for 2.5.0-RC2
Update of task #7890 (project freeciv): Status:None = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/task/?7890 ___ Nachricht gesendet von/durch Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4608] civ2civ3 rules: added pre-fortress
Follow-up Comment #17, patch #4608 (project freeciv): I think air units in airbases now receive a cumulative 35% HP regen per turn (10% from airstrip + 25% from airbase). Is that intentional? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4608 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5071] [Metaticket] Help updates for gen-extras
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #5071 (project freeciv): The Qt client has Irrigation: Grassland in 15 turns or Irrigation: +1 food in 15 turns. An easy way to go would be using Irrigation: Depends, see text. We could also list possible extras (adding links and updating the related help accordingly). This is doable with the Qt layout, more difficult with Gtk's. We could change the wording a little bit to emphasize the difference between activities and extras: use nouns (Irrigation) for extras and verbs (Irrigating) for activities. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5071 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23364] Boolean effects with negative value considered TRUE
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?23364 Summary: Boolean effects with negative value considered TRUE Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:34:34 AM EET Category: general Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: In Progress Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: None Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: There's still some of these left: EFT_HAPPINESS_TO_GOLD EFT_BO_DIPLOMACY ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23364 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23361] civ2civ3: sea unit help talks about ZOC
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #23361 (project freeciv): the simpler thing would be to comment out all the sea unit ZOC stuff Doesn't improve support for custom rulesets, though. something complicated to suppress the ZOC words for units only native to NoZoc terrain, We already do checking of native terrains in some situations, i.e., we have some tools for this, and there will be more in the future, i.e., additional tools made for this will be useful for other things in the future. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23361 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5916] Hexemplio (/Toonhex) unitextras
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5916 Summary: Hexemplio (/Toonhex) unitextras Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 12:44:53 AM EET Category: art Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: Update hexemplio unitextras.png to one from GriffonSpade's ampliohexbig-2.5.07: http://forum.freeciv.org/f/viewtopic.php?f=12t=501 This adds for example unit.outpost and unit.airstrip sprites so alien ruleset can be used with the hexemplio/toonhex tileset again, latter being current 'preferred tileset'. Spec-patch attached. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Sun 08 Mar 2015 12:44:53 AM EET Name: Unitextras.patch Size: 2kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24014 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5916 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23352] ruleset.nationlist not initialized
Update of bug #23352 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Fixed Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23352 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5915] civ2civ3: Require tech to mine deserts / glaciers (oil wells)?
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5915 Summary: civ2civ3: Require tech to mine deserts / glaciers (oil wells)? Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 20:15:57 UTC Category: rulesets Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Need Info Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: In patch #4391, we gave minimum tech requirements to mines (oil wells) on desert and glacier. Should we do something similar for civ2civ3? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5915 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5896] Alien hut_enter callback
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #5896 (project freeciv): Since it only affects files not included in the tarball, there's probably no reason to delay committing it on S2_5, either. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5896 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23361] civ2civ3: sea unit help talks about ZOC
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?23361 Summary: civ2civ3: sea unit help talks about ZOC Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 22:10:37 UTC Category: rulesets Severity: 2 - Minor Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: Any Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: e.g., Frigate: * Belongs to Sea unit class. * Subject to zones of control. * May impose a zone of control on its adjacent tiles. However, I don't think ZOC are in practice ever relevant for such units, due to water terrains having the NoZoc flag. (The only case where boats can be on land tiles, moving in and out of cities, is a special case for ZOC anyway.) I think this is from patch #4818, where sea units were given ZOC so that a single-line ruleset change could enable naval ZOC in deep ocean. While we could do something complicated to suppress the ZOC words for units only native to NoZoc terrain, the simpler thing would be to comment out all the sea unit ZOC stuff (with a greppable tag like NAVAL_ZOC so it can easily be added back in). (Triremes have similar words, but they are genuinely relevant to Triremes due to river movement.) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23361 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23340] Merchant units can only travel on ... (or) ships
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #23340 (project freeciv): Mm. I think it's OK English as it is, and my help is wordy enough as it is. Travel on ships is idiomatic. I suppose it is a kind of syllepsis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeugma#Type_2, at least in game rule terms, but not a particularly jarring one IMO. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23340 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5917] civ2civ3/experimental: forbid airlift for Big Land units?
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5917 Summary: civ2civ3/experimental: forbid airlift for Big Land units? Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 07 Mar 2015 23:39:54 UTC Category: rulesets Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Need Info Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: Now we have the Airliftable unit class flag, perhaps the bulkier units should be prevented from airlifting? In civ2civ3, Merchant units traditionally have similar restrictions to Big Land, but not being able to airlift them might be too annoying. (Also, I notice airlifting of Helicopters wasn't allowed along other air units in patch #4812. Is that deliberate?) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5917 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5071] [Metaticket] Help updates for gen-extras
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #5071 (project freeciv): gtk-clients provided information Nowadays also Qt-client. Unfortunately our shiny new helpdlg suitable for 2.5 release is not at all correct for 2.6 and beyond. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5071 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5917] civ2civ3/experimental: forbid airlift for Big Land units?
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #5917 (project freeciv): I'm not sure that airlift should be a barrier to moving *anything*. There are plenty of real-world examples of military cargo jets that can carry Main Battle Tanks, and Boeing's Dreamlifter was designed to carry other aircraft. Besides airlift, the *only* way to get units to another continent is the Transport. If Transport is the only way then that represents a hardship for land-locked nations. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5917 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5915] civ2civ3: Require tech to mine deserts / glaciers (oil wells)?
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #5915 (project freeciv): I'm not liking to see so many different requirements for the same mining task. It would be Construction for Deserts (and Tundra?, that can be mined here too), Refining for Glaciers, and Miniaturization for Oceans (this one already implemented). If they had an important effect on gameplay, it'd be worth for players to remember those requisites, but those mines are actually useless most of the time. For example, mining a desert is not very useful while the city is growing. I use to wait until the discovery of railroad that duplicates the effect, and even then it uses to be better to irrigate. It comes to my mind the idea of allowing a 1st mine that looks like a standard mine, and then the tech Refining would enable a 2nd mine in those terrains, with the look of an oil derrick. But it will require some time to balance properly such change. Please, let me think about it, because it could be a good solution to other issues too. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5915 ___ Mensaje enviado vía/por Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23364] Boolean effects with negative value considered TRUE
Update of bug #23364 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Fix (file #24018) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: BooleanEffects.patch Size:2 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23364 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5917] civ2civ3/experimental: forbid airlift for Big Land units?
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #5917 (project freeciv): Now we have the Airliftable unit class flag, perhaps the bulkier units should be prevented from airlifting? I agree David here. Also, now that railroad does not grant unlimited movement, and maglev only affects to small land units (no big land), I think it is important to allow them to be airlifted. The only units that does not make sense to me if airlifted are the naval units. I notice airlifting of Helicopters wasn't allowed along other air units in patch #4812. Is that deliberate? I'm not sure why I did not include helis. Maybe I wasn't sure if a unit that can carry other units could cause troubles when airlifted. If there is no such problem, I vote to allow them to be airlefted too. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5917 ___ Mensaje enviado vía/por Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5919] Add /usr/include/qt to header paths to search Qt from and /usr/lib/qt to lib paths
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5919 Summary: Add /usr/include/qt to header paths to search Qt from and /usr/lib/qt to lib paths Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 04:27:12 AM EET Category: bootstrap Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: stelonix on arch it's /usr/lib/qt5 and /usr/include/qt The /usr/include/qt is not in our default search paths. Add it, and also similar lib path /usr/lib/qt. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Sun 08 Mar 2015 04:27:12 AM EET Name: QtPlainPaths.patch Size: 986B By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24019 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5919 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5874] --escape as XGETTEXT_PARAMETER
Update of patch #5874 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5874 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4608] civ2civ3 rules: added pre-fortress
Follow-up Comment #18, patch #4608 (project freeciv): I remember it was intentional. I think because I did not like to see a unit in a city without airport (+33%) regenerating faster than in an airbase (+35%). The +10% of the Airstrip is supposed to be equal to the -10% lost out of bases (same turns recovering than turns outside). But it might be simpler to document a non cumulative +33% for the airbase, so it is equal than a city without airport. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4608 ___ Mensaje enviado vía/por Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #23365] 2.6 Regression: AI does not use Fighters
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?23365 Summary: 2.6 Regression: AI does not use Fighters Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sun 08 Mar 2015 06:56:24 AM EET Category: ai Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: None Planned Release: 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Details: patch #4927 made AI not to use Fighters (or similar). That's quite bad regression from earlier versions. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?23365 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
