[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
Update of patch #5969 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed Depends on: = patch #5954 ___ Follow-up Comment #2: I'm considering to back port this to 2.6 but aren't sure if it would be to big or not. Closing for now. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #5969 (project freeciv): I'm considering to back port this to 2.6 What use-cases it would have in 2.6? There's not many effects that could take it as a requirement. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #5969 (project freeciv): What use-cases it would have in 2.6? Setting Illegal_Action_Move_Cost pr action. Based on my interpretation of comment #2 in patch #5629 I believed you wanted this ability specifically. I may have read it to fast and jumped to conclusions. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
Follow-up Comment #5, patch #5969 (project freeciv): Setting Illegal_Action_Move_Cost pr action. But that alone? Having action requirement type for just that one rather specific use in 2.6 seems like overkill to me (I assume it's going to get used more in TRUNK) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #5969 (project freeciv): But that alone? Having action requirement type for just that one rather specific use in 2.6 seems like overkill to me Thank you for your advice. I'm no longer considering to back port this to 2.6. I assume it's going to get used more in TRUNK It is. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5969] Add new requirement type Action.
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 Summary: Add new requirement type Action. Project: Freeciv Submitted by: sveinung Submitted on: Mon 30 Mar 2015 04:27:37 PM UTC Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: sveinung Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 3.0.0 ___ Details: It is intended to be like OutputType. All it currently is good for is setting Illegal_Action_Move_Cost pr action. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Mon 30 Mar 2015 04:27:37 PM UTC Name: 0003-Add-new-requirement-type-Action.patch Size: 11kB By: sveinung http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=24163 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?5969 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
