Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Marko Lindqvist]

On 22 February 2014 10:05, "Andreas Røsdal"  wrote:
>
> Also, what do you think of moving Freeciv development
> from svn to github.com/freeciv?

The only thing changed since this was discussed last time
( http://forum.freeciv.org/f/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=160 )
is that now we have initial version of --enable-gitrev feature.

For myself the roadmap would be to switch from plain svn to git-svn
(setup my workflow to work with git that way) and then the master
repository to switch from svn to git, but during all the years this
has been in my TODO there has been virtually no progress. At some
point I were thinking that it could be part of facelift to bump
freeciv version number to 3.x, but we'll see.


 - ML

___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

> On 29 November 2013 17:11, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:
>>
>>> Also, when do we make freeciv-web development subject to code
>>> inspections freeciv policy requires?
>>
>> I don't mind that.
>
>  Fix to bug #21660 is now the first patch that I've submitted to
> freeciv-dev for inspection, instead of just pushing to git.

Great! I'm still fine with using code inspections to review Freeciv-web
patches.
Do we have any documentation about this review process?

Anything we can do to bring Freeciv and Freeciv-web closer together I am
positive about. So I hope that we can work together to remove the patches
needed
to build Freeciv-web.

Also, what do you think of moving Freeciv development
from svn to github.com/freeciv?




___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Marko Lindqvist]

On 29 November 2013 17:11, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:
>
>> Also, when do we make freeciv-web development subject to code
>> inspections freeciv policy requires?
>
> I don't mind that.

 Fix to bug #21660 is now the first patch that I've submitted to
freeciv-dev for inspection, instead of just pushing to git.


 - ML

___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Marko Lindqvist]

I'll try to get one step forward tonight (to revision 24430 it seems),
and rest during the weekend. Once freeciv-web reaches freeciv trunk
HEAD, I plan to work on reducing the diff between freeciv and
freeciv-web copy of it in a synchronized manner. There's already patch
#4484 and patch #4485 waiting for that. But I guess that should be the
normal development mode where freeciv-web (master branch) copy of
freeciv server gets constantly updated, so you should be able to work
on web side then, though I don't know if you need to create branches
for versions that actually get deployed.

 My installation of freeciv-web is not complete, so unfortunately I
have not been able to test how scenarios work. There's one important
change there - France scenario now has Inaccessible terrains on East
and South borders. Units shouldn't be able to enter these tiles and
cities should be unable to work them.

 In general freeciv-web development I'm also expecting to fully
implement support for multiple installations on the same machine, to
be able to switch between different versions when developing/testing.
For most parts it's already possible to install it to location other
than ~/freeciv-build/ (I have never used it there) Documentation
obviously needs updating.


 - ML

On 13 February 2014 23:55, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:
> How is the update of Freeciv-web going? I see that you have reached revision
> 23908, and also cleaned up some of the patches, which is great!
> How much work do you think is remaining? What do you think should be the
> next steps for Freeciv-web after the upgrade is complete?
>
> Andreas

___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

How is the update of Freeciv-web going? I see that you have reached 
revision 23908, and also cleaned up some of the patches, which is great!
How much work do you think is remaining? What do you think should be the 
next steps for Freeciv-web after the upgrade is complete?


Andreas



On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, "Andreas Røsdal" wrote:


Hi!

I think it's great that you want to update Freeciv-web to the latest Freeciv
development code, so feel free to work on that on the freeciv github repo.
Once you have completed the update of Freeciv-web I can
begin again improving Freeciv-Web. I will follow your
progress with great interest!

Andreas


 I'm just doing checkout of freeciv-web again. I noticed that the
freeciv server is from last summer TRUNK, so it's a bit like bad sides
of both worlds (using stable branch vs development version): unstable
but old. Swithcing back to stable S2_5 would probably be
counter-productive at this point, so I think we should forward it to
use current development code again. Is it ok if I do? It's likely to
break thing or two for a while, so if you're about to get new version
to production soon, it's better to postpone the freeciv-server update
after that.
 All this assuming that I now get my freeciv-web development
environment to work again.


 - ML



___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Chaitanya Sharma]

I'd love that., there's a great many improvements possible.

What do you guys think about moving the all of freeciv web-development to
github.
In addition to pull requests, use it track issues aswell ?

-Chaitanya



On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:10 PM, "Andreas Røsdal" wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I think it's great that you want to update Freeciv-web to the latest
> Freeciv
> development code, so feel free to work on that on the freeciv github repo.
> Once you have completed the update of Freeciv-web I can
> begin again improving Freeciv-Web. I will follow your
> progress with great interest!
>
> Andreas
>
> >  I'm just doing checkout of freeciv-web again. I noticed that the
> > freeciv server is from last summer TRUNK, so it's a bit like bad sides
> > of both worlds (using stable branch vs development version): unstable
> > but old. Swithcing back to stable S2_5 would probably be
> > counter-productive at this point, so I think we should forward it to
> > use current development code again. Is it ok if I do? It's likely to
> > break thing or two for a while, so if you're about to get new version
> > to production soon, it's better to postpone the freeciv-server update
> > after that.
> >  All this assuming that I now get my freeciv-web development
> > environment to work again.
> >
> >
> >  - ML
> >
>
>
>
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

Hi!

I think it's great that you want to update Freeciv-web to the latest Freeciv
development code, so feel free to work on that on the freeciv github repo.
Once you have completed the update of Freeciv-web I can
begin again improving Freeciv-Web. I will follow your
progress with great interest!

Andreas

>  I'm just doing checkout of freeciv-web again. I noticed that the
> freeciv server is from last summer TRUNK, so it's a bit like bad sides
> of both worlds (using stable branch vs development version): unstable
> but old. Swithcing back to stable S2_5 would probably be
> counter-productive at this point, so I think we should forward it to
> use current development code again. Is it ok if I do? It's likely to
> break thing or two for a while, so if you're about to get new version
> to production soon, it's better to postpone the freeciv-server update
> after that.
>  All this assuming that I now get my freeciv-web development
> environment to work again.
>
>
>  - ML
>



___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Marko Lindqvist]

 I'm just doing checkout of freeciv-web again. I noticed that the
freeciv server is from last summer TRUNK, so it's a bit like bad sides
of both worlds (using stable branch vs development version): unstable
but old. Swithcing back to stable S2_5 would probably be
counter-productive at this point, so I think we should forward it to
use current development code again. Is it ok if I do? It's likely to
break thing or two for a while, so if you're about to get new version
to production soon, it's better to postpone the freeciv-server update
after that.
 All this assuming that I now get my freeciv-web development
environment to work again.


 - ML

___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Marko Lindqvist wrote:


On 29 November 2013 00:41, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:

Hi!

Yes, I think this mailing list is fine for freeciv-web discussions.


Yes, as freeciv-web is now part of freeciv project organization (move
we never officially announced anywhere, I think) most of the freeciv
services should be used for freeciv-web development too, the big
difference being that freeciv-web has separate version control
repository.
Still, freeciv-web development has been going quite independently
from main freeciv. Maybe Andreas could make a habit to report here
every now and then what kind of updates freeciv-web has received etc.


Sure, I can post development updates here.


Also, when do we make freeciv-web development subject to code
inspections freeciv policy requires?


I don't mind that.

Andreas___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Chaitanya Sharma wrote:


Thank you for the response, I've been keen about the freeciv-web project and
was hoping to get started on it.But this mailing list seems to be slow
moving, not a lot of traction here.


I've noticed a bunch of tasks defined on the TODO
file; https://github.com/freeciv/freeciv-web/blob/master/TODO
Do they represent the current set of tasks (or direction) for the project ?


Yes, the TODO file is a useful place to look for things to improve. If you 
have other suggestions, that would be fine also.



If that's so, would it be okay to just add them to the github's issue
tracker ?


Bugs to Freeciv-web can be reported to the Freeciv-web category here: 
http://freeciv.wikia.com/wiki/Bug_Reporting


Let me know if you need help getting Freeciv-web running on your local 
computer. It can take some effort, but should be possible.


Regards,
Andreas
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Chaitanya Sharma]

Thank you for the response, I've been keen about the freeciv-web project
and was hoping to get started on it.
But this mailing list seems to be slow moving, not a lot of traction here.


I've noticed a bunch of tasks defined on the TODO file;
https://github.com/freeciv/freeciv-web/blob/master/TODO
Do they represent the current set of tasks (or direction) for the project ?
If that's so, would it be okay to just add them to the github's issue
tracker ?

I'd be happy to do that, let me know.


-Chaitanya










 On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Marko Lindqvist  wrote:

> On 29 November 2013 00:41, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yes, I think this mailing list is fine for freeciv-web discussions.
>
>  Yes, as freeciv-web is now part of freeciv project organization (move
> we never officially announced anywhere, I think) most of the freeciv
> services should be used for freeciv-web development too, the big
> difference being that freeciv-web has separate version control
> repository.
>  Still, freeciv-web development has been going quite independently
> from main freeciv. Maybe Andreas could make a habit to report here
> every now and then what kind of updates freeciv-web has received etc.
>  Also, when do we make freeciv-web development subject to code
> inspections freeciv policy requires?
>
>
>  - ML
>
> ___
> Freeciv-dev mailing list
> Freeciv-dev@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
>
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Marko Lindqvist]

On 29 November 2013 00:41, Andreas Røsdal  wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, I think this mailing list is fine for freeciv-web discussions.

 Yes, as freeciv-web is now part of freeciv project organization (move
we never officially announced anywhere, I think) most of the freeciv
services should be used for freeciv-web development too, the big
difference being that freeciv-web has separate version control
repository.
 Still, freeciv-web development has been going quite independently
from main freeciv. Maybe Andreas could make a habit to report here
every now and then what kind of updates freeciv-web has received etc.
 Also, when do we make freeciv-web development subject to code
inspections freeciv policy requires?


 - ML

___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Andreas Røsdal]

Hi!

Yes, I think this mailing list is fine for freeciv-web discussions.
Feel free to ask about anything you need to get started with freeciv-web 
development. Also, please submit improvements as pull requests to the 
Freeciv-web github page: https://github.com/freeciv/freeciv-web/


Good luck!

Regards,
Andreas



Hey All,

I'm new to the mailling / dev team for the freeciv project as well.

Is this the correct place for talking to or co-ordinate with the devs for 
the freeciv-web project ?
If not can you please re-direct me to the mailing list. Thanks in 

advance.



-Chaitanya


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv-Web Project.

[Chaitanya Sharma]

Hey All,

I'm new to the mailling / dev team for the freeciv project as well.

Is this the correct place for talking to or co-ordinate with the devs for
the freeciv-web project  ?
If not can you please re-direct me to the mailing list. Thanks in advance.


-Chaitanya
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev