Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 0.11.5

2015-08-04 Thread Caleb Williams
How does that script work? I know next to nothing about Shell scripts. I do
know the site was up to date when I visited later.

Caleb
On Aug 4, 2015 4:16 AM, Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org wrote:

 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:30:19 -0500
 Caleb Williams cale...@gmail.com wrote:
  Looks like the website is still out of date.

 Looks OK from here.  Which page/s?

 Cheers,
 Mike Pope


 --

 ___
 Freecol-developers mailing list
 Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers


--
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers


Re: [Freecol-developers] 0.11.4

2015-08-04 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:28:15 +0200
win...@genial.ms wrote:
[who knows what the current active unit is?]
 Well IGC does not know, it asks (Swing)GUI (which routes that to MapViewer)

I think this is overstating the case.  IGC calls getActiveUnit in three
places:
1. saveGame, because the active unit has to go into the saved game
2. doExecuteGotoOrders, where it just saves the current unit so it can
restore it after doing all the automatic moves.

Neither of these cases are involve decision making.  The only place
where the result of getActiveUnit is tested at all is:

3. updateActiveUnit, where it merely checks if the current active unit can
still move before looking for the next one.

AFAICT if we wanted to, IGC could just cache the last active unit it set
and eliminate these calls entirely, albeit for very little gain.  It does
have to be in the GUI.

OTOH all the actual *decisions* about when the active unit needs
to change are made in the command-level routines in IGC, and end up in
calls to updateActiveUnit.  I think my contention that IGC has the
knowledge is solid.

This is not to disagree with your point that MapViewer is a mess and is
probably confusing matters.  Also, looking at IGC, I think the code can be
tightened further in a few places... patches underway.

 Yes, InfoPanel is mostly passive, but when its called to be informed of
 an update it only gets partial information and then does back calling to
 grab missing info. The back calling should be deleted.

Agreed.

 Well, it needs checking anyway. As said above the view mode changing is 
 probably
 missing some calls to propagate updates.

I am pretty sure IGC is making the required calls, but I am looking for
omissions nonetheless.  All I have found so far is places where it
probably makes too many.  The suspicion is certainly that something is
getting lost in MapViewer.

[open-needs-media / Media_Needed]
 I saw your updates, but they are a bit inconsistent.
 Each tracker had already different milestones, openness status and shown
 colums, which is irritating. Now one of the art things is a milestone, the
 other is open-need media.
 Is it possible to make them all more alike the Bugs tracker?

That probably makes sense for the IRs.  Low priority task.  Next time I am
sick perhaps.  FC2-tracker is a different case.

Cheers,
Mike Pope


pgpukmB3C119b.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers


Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 0.11.5

2015-08-04 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:46:10 +0930
Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org wrote:
 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:30:19 -0500
 Caleb Williams cale...@gmail.com wrote:
  Looks like the website is still out of date.
 
 Looks OK from here.  Which page/s?

I kicked out the Joomla tags with a one-liner and used those changes to
trigger a big push, hopefully catching what was bothering you.

Cheers,
Mike Pope


pgpIM_52DTkHV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers


Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 0.11.5

2015-08-04 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:30:19 -0500
Caleb Williams cale...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks like the website is still out of date.

Looks OK from here.  Which page/s?

Cheers,
Mike Pope


pgpjBwSpVf5Ce.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers