Re: [Freedos-user] Command prompt returns without commands executing

2009-04-26 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Blair Campbell schreef:
 the data from XMS... There might be some code which decides about
 whether restore-from-XMS is needed and which is too optimistic. But
 maybe I am totally wrong about that whole swap/overwrite topic...
 

 From what I can tell it always swaps back from XMS and there is no
 other memory block that I am aware of.
   
Would your changes to FreeCOM be worthwile to be published at the same 
time as 2038 (in other words to be included as a new FreeCOM version, 
included with 2038 release) ?.

Bernd

--
Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] chkdsk broken?

2009-04-26 Thread Jim Hall
 When I run chkdsk it reports many problems:

 ChkDsk beta 0.9
 Copyright 2002, 2003 Imre Leber under the GNU GPL

 \KERNEL.SYS has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294901760, but 
 the entry says it's 45341
 \COMMAND.COM has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294868992, but 
 the entry says it's 66945
 ...

 This is a known bug from 2003, bugzilla says it would be fixed?

 www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

 I do not know what the current version is but a 0.91 exists:

 www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=1954

 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2462084group_id=5109atid=105109

 That version still fails for drives without subdirectories :-(


According to the software list, 0.9.1 (probably same as 0.91) is the
latest version:
http://www.freedos.org/cgi-bin/lsm.cgi?mode=lsmlsm=base/chkdsk.lsm

--
Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FDUPDATE and the 486...

2009-04-26 Thread Michael Robinson

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:35 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
 Hi,
 
  Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486?  I lost the link to
  fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
  v0.54.  If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
  coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
  
  I've noticed that I get a C prompt back after the crash if I say
  387=no in autoexec.bat.  I haven't confirmed this, I should test
  with and without it to confirm.  It seems to be true though.
 
 Please check if this is the case. Another thing is that you
 can put em387.dxe or wemu387.dxe or emu387.dxe or so...? The
 file seems to be emu387.dxe in djdev203.zip ...
 
 Somebody in the freebasic forum said:
 
  Anyways, in pure DOS (not Windows) I think you can disable
  the FPU detection for DJGPP by doing set 387=n and set
  EMU387=c:\mydir\wmemu387.dxe. It should work.
 
 I guess other options are putting the dxe in your PATH or in
 the current directory or the directory where FDUPDATE is etc.
 
 Eric

I fried all my 486 processors and it makes more sense to fix a Pentium
III up then it does to try and cobble together another 486.  I'm getting
out of the 486 business, so I may never find out if fdupdate will work
on one.


--
Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Abandonware site...

2009-04-26 Thread Michael Robinson
  MS-DOS and Windows 3.x are clearly abandonware.  If I want to
  use this abandonware, am I suddenly breaking the law?
 
 Not suddenly. It is and was breaking the law. Of course you can
 hope that MS is too busy hunting people who steal Vista, but
 you cannot just say that stealing MS DOS is suddenly legal...

Some MS-DOS games don't work in freedos, something that can 
be fixed hopefully, and one needs MS-DOS for them.  That said, 
games like Ultima VII and any game based on the Wolfenstein 3D 
gaming engine will work on 98 on down and in some cases in XP 
if you use either dosbox or in the case of Ultima VII, Exult.  
It is illegal to download and use MS-DOS, but I have a wrecked 
copy of it sitting on the shelf.  If Microsoft were to try and 
sue me for my copy, I can point to the one on the shelf as well 
as the fact that MS-DOS licenses were never tied to specific 
computers.  I could also complain that Microsoft isn't 
supporting MS-DOS and claim that it doesn't have a right 
to sue people over it.  There is also the fact that I don't
profit from MS-DOS in any way which is outside of the realm
of personal use.

MS-DOS to my knowledge never asked for an installation code
and it is not marked in any way as copy XYZ.  Windows 95 is
a different story where I threw away my cracked copy which
is labeled as being the property of McDonald's.

The fact that Microsoft can prosecute illegal use of 
ancient versions of Windows and all versions of MS-DOS 
is all the more reason for this project to pick up and 
release a better freedos.  It is also high time that a 
Windows 3.1/9x replacement got under way.  Most games 
that run in either 98/XP are really meant for 98.  
ReactOS is not 98 and the ReactOS team will never pursue 
a gui that runs on top of dos.

Actually, one thing I don't like about ReactOS is that
it asks for identifying information including a name
and company just like Windows 9x and later does.


--
Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user