[Freedos-user] FDUPDATE and the 486...

2009-04-19 Thread Michael Robinson
Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486?  I lost the link to
fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
v0.54.  If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.

I've noticed that I get a C prompt back after the crash if I say
387=no in autoexec.bat.  I haven't confirmed this, I should test
with and without it to confirm.  It seems to be true though.


--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FDUPDATE and the 486...

2009-04-19 Thread Mateusz Viste
On Monday 20 April 2009 00:08 (CEST), Michael Robinson wrote:
> Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486?  I lost the link to
> fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it 

Hi,

You didn't lose it, it simply never existed :)
I sent you a beta FDUPDATE version with support for the HTGET downloader (that 
would finally confirm wheter it is a problem with launching third-party 
downloaders or not) several days ago. I have resent it to you right now.

> If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
> coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.

Personally, I don't really believe in that, 'cause you said that it crashes 
when you try to apply the first update. That means that FDUPDATE has already 
worked correctly for a long time (relatively), as it 1) launched itself 2) 
launched an instance of the downloader 3) the downloader downloaded the index 
file of the repository 4) FDUPDATE compared the repo index with the local LSM 
database.
Of course, I could be plainly wrong :-)

Regards,
Mateusz Viste
-- 
You'll find my public OpenPGP key at http://www.viste-family.net/mateusz/pub_key


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FDUPDATE and the 486...

2009-04-25 Thread Eric Auer

Hi,

> Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486?  I lost the link to
> fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
> v0.54.  If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
> coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
> 
> I've noticed that I get a C prompt back after the crash if I say
> 387=no in autoexec.bat.  I haven't confirmed this, I should test
> with and without it to confirm.  It seems to be true though.

Please check if this is the case. Another thing is that you
can put em387.dxe or wemu387.dxe or emu387.dxe or so...? The
file seems to be emu387.dxe in djdev203.zip ...

Somebody in the freebasic forum said:

> Anyways, in pure DOS (not Windows) I think you can disable
> the FPU detection for DJGPP by doing "set 387=n" and "set
> EMU387=c:\mydir\wmemu387.dxe". It should work.

I guess other options are putting the dxe in your PATH or in
the current directory or the directory where FDUPDATE is etc.

Eric



--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FDUPDATE and the 486...

2009-04-26 Thread Michael Robinson

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:35 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486?  I lost the link to
> > fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
> > v0.54.  If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
> > coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
> > 
> > I've noticed that I get a C prompt back after the crash if I say
> > 387=no in autoexec.bat.  I haven't confirmed this, I should test
> > with and without it to confirm.  It seems to be true though.
> 
> Please check if this is the case. Another thing is that you
> can put em387.dxe or wemu387.dxe or emu387.dxe or so...? The
> file seems to be emu387.dxe in djdev203.zip ...
> 
> Somebody in the freebasic forum said:
> 
> > Anyways, in pure DOS (not Windows) I think you can disable
> > the FPU detection for DJGPP by doing "set 387=n" and "set
> > EMU387=c:\mydir\wmemu387.dxe". It should work.
> 
> I guess other options are putting the dxe in your PATH or in
> the current directory or the directory where FDUPDATE is etc.
> 
> Eric

I fried all my 486 processors and it makes more sense to fix a Pentium
III up then it does to try and cobble together another 486.  I'm getting
out of the 486 business, so I may never find out if fdupdate will work
on one.


--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user